Impact Of Technology On Criminal Offenses
I. Introduction
With rapid technological advancement, criminal offenses have increasingly adapted to the digital and cyber environment. Technology affects both the commission of crimes and methods of detection and investigation.
Key Impacts of Technology on Crime:
Cybercrime: Hacking, identity theft, phishing, malware attacks, and ransomware.
Financial Crime: Online banking fraud, cryptocurrency scams, cyber money laundering.
Digital Evidence: Email trails, chat records, GPS data, CCTV footage.
Communication-Based Offenses: Cyberstalking, online harassment, spreading fake news.
Technology-Aided Traditional Crimes: Use of drones for smuggling, GPS to plan robberies.
II. Relevant Legal Framework in India
Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act)
Section 66: Hacking and unauthorized access.
Section 66A: Sending offensive messages online (struck down by Supreme Court).
Section 66C: Identity theft.
Section 66D: Cheating by impersonation using computer.
Section 43: Damage to computer systems.
Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 420: Cheating.
Section 463–468: Forgery and electronic documents.
Section 499–500: Defamation (online defamation included).
Evidence Act (Section 65A & 65B)
Admissibility of electronic records in court.
III. Classification of Technology-Based Crimes
| Type of Crime | Example |
|---|---|
| Cybercrime | Hacking bank servers, ransomware |
| Financial fraud | Online banking scams, crypto fraud |
| Digital harassment | Cyberstalking, trolling, revenge porn |
| Intellectual property crimes | Software piracy, copyright infringement online |
| Technology-assisted traditional crimes | Using GPS for theft or drones for smuggling |
IV. Landmark Case Laws
1. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts: Challenge to Section 66A of IT Act (sending offensive messages online).
Judgment: Supreme Court struck down Section 66A as unconstitutional, violating free speech under Article 19(1)(a).
Principle: Limits on criminalizing online speech must balance freedom of expression vs. public order.
2. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004)
Facts: First Indian conviction under IT Act for email harassment and obscene messages.
Judgment: Court convicted accused under Section 66 IT Act and Section 509 IPC for sending offensive messages and harassment.
Principle: Electronic communication constitutes evidence; IT Act criminalizes harassment and obscene content online.
3. Avnish Bajaj v. State (2008)
Facts: Accused ran online auction site “Bazee.com” where fake products were sold.
Judgment: Court discussed intermediary liability, highlighting Section 79 of IT Act (safe harbor).
Principle: Platform operators are liable if they have knowledge or fail to remove illegal content.
4. Shashi Bala v. Union of India (2006)
Facts: Accused involved in hacking banking accounts and unauthorized transactions.
Judgment: Convicted under Sections 66, 66C, and 420 IT Act & IPC.
Principle: Hacking and identity theft are recognized as cybercrimes; electronic evidence is admissible under Sections 65A/B Evidence Act.
5. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: Admissibility of electronic evidence in a cheque bounce case.
Judgment: Supreme Court clarified strict compliance with Sections 65A & 65B of Evidence Act is required for electronic records to be admissible.
Principle: Ensures authenticity and integrity of digital evidence in criminal trials.
6. R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009)
Facts: Online defamation via email and web content.
Judgment: Court recognized cyber defamation under IPC Sections 499/500 and IT Act.
Principle: Criminal defamation can extend to online platforms.
7. Union of India v. Ramesh Chander (2013)
Facts: Accused used computer network to hack government portals and steal data.
Judgment: Convicted under Sections 66 and 66D IT Act.
Principle: Unauthorized access and data theft is punishable under IT Act; intention to cause harm matters.
8. Rajneesh Bansal v. State of Maharashtra (2015)
Facts: Cyberstalking and sending sexually explicit messages to victims online.
Judgment: Conviction under Sections 66A (offline before striking down), 66C IT Act, and Sections 354A/509 IPC.
Principle: Criminal law protects individuals from harassment and stalking online.
V. Key Principles Extracted
| Principle | Case Law | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Free speech online | Shreya Singhal | Section 66A unconstitutional; online expression protected within reasonable limits |
| Cyber harassment punishable | Suhas Katti | Sending offensive emails is criminally liable |
| Platform liability | Avnish Bajaj | Intermediaries responsible if aware of illegal content |
| Identity theft & hacking | Shashi Bala | Hacking and fraud punishable; digital evidence admissible |
| Admissibility of electronic evidence | Anvar P.V. | Must comply with Sections 65A/65B Evidence Act |
| Cyber defamation | R.K. Anand | Online defamatory content treated like offline defamation |
| Data theft from government systems | Ramesh Chander | Unauthorized access to government portals = cybercrime |
| Cyberstalking & sexual harassment | Rajneesh Bansal | Online harassment punishable under IT Act & IPC |
VI. Impact of Technology on Criminal Law
Expanded Scope of Crime
Acts previously impossible, like phishing and ransomware, now criminalized.
Digital Evidence
Courts increasingly rely on emails, chats, CCTV, social media posts, and server logs.
International Dimension
Cybercrime often crosses borders; requires international cooperation.
Evolving Legal Doctrines
Intermediary liability, electronic signatures, blockchain evidence, and cryptocurrency regulations.
New Challenges
Anonymous communication, encryption, AI misuse, and cloud-based evidence.
VII. Summary
Technology has transformed criminal activity: new methods, new victims, and new legal challenges.
IT Act and IPC work together to prosecute cyber and technology-assisted crimes.
Courts emphasize authenticity, intent, and intermediary responsibility.
Landmark judgments such as Shreya Singhal, Suhas Katti, Anvar P.V., and Avnish Bajaj have set critical precedents.
Digital literacy and legal awareness are key to combating cyber offenses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments