Right Against Self-Incrimination: SC Quashes Confession Extracted Through Threat
- ByAdmin --
- 11 Apr 2025 --
- 0 Comments
In an NDPS case in Punjab, the accused was allegedly made to confess under threat of custodial torture and seizure of family property.
He retracted the statement in court. Still, the confession was used to frame charges.
But the Supreme Court stepped in and reminded the country that no one is required to convict themselves.
Legal Foundation
Article 20(3) guarantees that no person accused of a crime can be compelled to be a witness against himself.
This protection:
- Covers verbal confessions, written statements, or any action under coercion
- Applies even before formal arrest
- Is the reason police must follow proper evidence procedures, not shortcuts
What the Court Held
- A confession made without voluntary consent is not admissible
- Custodial confessions under NDPS Act must be corroborated by evidence
- Threats or pressure tactics by officers violate both the Constitution and CrPC
“No accused is bound to help convict himself,” the Court asserted.
Result
- Case was quashed
- FIR stood dismissed
- Officers involved were summoned for disciplinary review
This ruling reinforces the golden rule: You are innocent until proven guilty—and never required to prove your own guilt.
RELATED Blog
0 comments