Damages under Indian Contract Act
Damages under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
1. Introduction
Damages are a monetary compensation awarded to a party when the other party breaches a contract. The purpose of awarding damages is to put the injured party in the position they would have been if the contract had been properly performed.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, primarily deals with damages in Sections 73 and 74.
2. Relevant Provisions
Section 73: Compensation for Loss or Damage caused by breach of contract
When a contract is broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive compensation from the party who has broken the contract.
The compensation should be reasonable, considering the loss or damage caused directly and naturally by the breach.
The loss or damage must have been foreseeable at the time of contract formation as likely to result from the breach.
Section 74: Compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated
If a contract contains a clause stipulating a sum to be paid in case of breach (liquidated damages or penalty), the party complaining of breach is entitled to receive compensation not exceeding the stipulated sum.
The court may reduce the amount if it finds the sum to be exorbitant or unconscionable.
3. Principles Governing Damages
a) Compensatory Nature
Damages are intended to compensate the injured party, not to punish the defaulter.
The compensation must relate to the actual loss suffered.
b) Foreseeability
Only losses foreseeable or contemplated by the parties at the time of contract formation are recoverable.
Losses that are too remote or indirect cannot be claimed.
c) Mitigation
The injured party must take reasonable steps to minimize or mitigate the loss caused by the breach.
Failure to mitigate damages may reduce the amount awarded.
d) Remoteness of Damage
Damages recoverable are those arising naturally from the breach or those that were in the contemplation of both parties.
4. Types of Damages
General Damages: Arise naturally from breach.
Special Damages: Arise from special circumstances known to both parties.
Nominal Damages: Small sum awarded when breach occurred but no actual loss proved.
Exemplary/Punitive Damages: Rarely awarded under Indian law; meant to punish.
Liquidated Damages: Pre-agreed sum stipulated in contract.
Consequential Damages: Resulting indirectly but as a consequence of breach.
5. Important Case Laws
a) Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341
Established the rule of foreseeability in damages.
Damages recoverable only for losses that arise naturally or were in the contemplation of parties.
b) Koufos v C Czarnikow Ltd. (The Heron II) (1969)
Clarified that damages must be reasonably foreseeable, not just a possibility.
c) Chinnaya v Ramayya (1882) ILR 7 Mad 38
Held that damages can be recovered only when loss is proved.
Speculative damages are not awarded.
d) Bir Singh v Union of India AIR 1966 SC 379
Emphasized that damages should restore the injured party’s expectation interest.
e) Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v Brojo Nath Ganguly (1986) AIR 1571
Indian Supreme Court discussed when punitive damages are awarded—only in exceptional cases involving malicious or oppressive conduct.
6. Application and Practical Aspects
Damages are often the first remedy sought in breach of contract cases.
Parties can also agree on liquidated damages clauses to pre-determine compensation.
Courts scrutinize such clauses to prevent penalty or unjust enrichment.
Proof of actual loss and causation is crucial.
Mitigation of damages by the injured party is an essential duty.
7. Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Legal Provisions | Sections 73 & 74, Indian Contract Act, 1872 |
| Purpose of Damages | Compensate for loss caused by breach of contract |
| Key Principles | Foreseeability, mitigation, remoteness, compensation |
| Types of Damages | General, special, nominal, liquidated, punitive |
| Landmark Case Laws | Hadley v Baxendale, Koufos (Heron II), Chinnaya v Ramayya |
Conclusion
Damages under the Indian Contract Act aim to restore the injured party to the position they would have enjoyed had the contract been performed. Courts carefully assess the nature of loss, foreseeability, and reasonableness while awarding damages, ensuring fairness and predictability in commercial and private contracts.
RELATED Blog
0 comments