Law of Evidence at Peru
In Peru, the Law of Evidence is governed by several legal frameworks, including the Código Procesal Civil (Civil Procedure Code), Código Procesal Penal (Criminal Procedure Code), and the Constitution of Peru. The principles of evidence in Peru emphasize fairness, legality, and the right to defense in both civil and criminal matters.
Here’s an overview of the Law of Evidence in Peru:
1. Sources of Evidence Law
Código Procesal Civil (Civil Procedure Code) — applies to civil matters.
Código Procesal Penal (Criminal Procedure Code) — applies to criminal matters.
Constitution of Peru — establishes due process rights and the protection of rights in legal proceedings.
Constitutional Jurisprudence — decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru play a crucial role in interpreting the rights related to evidence.
2. Key Principles
Free Evaluation of Evidence (Prueba Libre): In both civil and criminal cases, judges have discretion in how they evaluate and weigh evidence. They must, however, explain their reasoning clearly.
Right to Defense: In criminal cases, the accused has the right to present evidence, challenge the prosecution’s evidence, and defend themselves.
Presumption of Innocence: In criminal law, the prosecution bears the burden of proof. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Legality and Fairness: Evidence must be obtained legally. Evidence obtained through illegal means (e.g., torture, illegal wiretaps) is generally inadmissible.
Equality of Arms: Both parties in a dispute should have an equal opportunity to present and challenge evidence.
3. Types of Evidence
Documentary Evidence: Includes written documents, contracts, and electronic communication (e.g., emails, digital files).
Witness Testimony: Oral testimony given by witnesses under oath in court.
Expert Testimony: Opinions and analyses provided by qualified experts in a specific field, such as medicine, accounting, or technology.
Physical or Material Evidence: Tangible objects presented to the court, such as weapons, clothing, or documents.
Digital or Electronic Evidence: Increasingly important in modern cases, including data from computers, smartphones, and other devices.
Presumptions: Legal presumptions that can be made based on certain facts or conditions.
4. Civil vs. Criminal Evidence
In civil cases, the judge has a wide latitude in evaluating evidence, but the parties must present it according to the rules of the Código Procesal Civil. Documents, testimony, and expert opinions are frequently used.
In criminal cases, evidence is strictly regulated by the Código Procesal Penal. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and the defense has the right to challenge evidence presented against the accused. Illegally obtained evidence may be excluded, and there are strict rules about the admissibility of evidence.
5. Notable Aspects in Criminal Evidence
Preservation of Evidence: In criminal investigations, authorities must preserve evidence in a manner that ensures its integrity.
Witness Protection: Peru has mechanisms for protecting witnesses in serious criminal cases, ensuring that they can testify without fear of retaliation.
Digital Evidence: Given the increasing use of technology, digital evidence (e.g., social media, phone records) is gaining importance. Legal procedures for handling digital evidence are carefully outlined in the Código Procesal Penal.
6. Recent Developments and Reforms
Reforms to the Criminal Justice System: Peru has been modernizing its criminal procedure system, moving towards more adversarial proceedings (in line with international human rights standards), which affects how evidence is presented and assessed in court.
Constitutional Court Rulings: The Constitutional Court of Peru has issued significant rulings on the admissibility of evidence, especially concerning privacy rights and evidence obtained through surveillance or other investigative methods.
0 comments