Human Rights Law at Argentina
Argentina has a complex history regarding human rights, particularly tied to its military dictatorship from 1976 to 1983, when the country was ruled under a repressive military junta. During this time, thousands of people were "disappeared," tortured, and killed for their political beliefs. Argentina has since become an important case study in international human rights law, especially in terms of accountability, truth-telling, and reconciliation. Below are detailed explanations of several significant human rights cases in Argentina:
1. The Dirty War (La Guerra Sucia) – 1976-1983
Case Overview:
The "Dirty War" refers to the period when Argentina was under military rule, from 1976 to 1983. During this time, the military junta engaged in widespread human rights violations, including enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, torture, and arbitrary imprisonment. The regime targeted anyone they considered a threat to their power, including political activists, intellectuals, students, labor leaders, and anyone suspected of left-wing sympathies.
Legal Outcome:
After the return to democracy in 1983, Argentina began a long process of seeking justice for the crimes committed during the Dirty War. Early efforts were hampered by laws such as the Full Stop Law (1986) and the Law of Due Obedience (1987), which granted amnesty to perpetrators. However, in the early 2000s, these laws were repealed, and trials began against those responsible for the abuses.
In the 2000s, a series of high-profile trials were held, resulting in convictions of numerous military officials. In 2005, the Argentine Supreme Court ruled that the amnesty laws were unconstitutional, allowing the prosecution of individuals responsible for the crimes of the dictatorship. Some of the most notable trials include those of former dictators Jorge Rafael Videla and Reynaldo Benito Antonio Bignone, both of whom were sentenced to prison for human rights abuses.
2. The Case of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo
Case Overview:
The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo is a human rights organization formed by Argentine women whose children were "disappeared" during the military dictatorship. The mothers gathered every Thursday in the Plaza de Mayo, in front of the presidential palace, demanding justice and the return of their children. Over the years, they became a symbol of resistance and advocacy for the rights of the victims of forced disappearances.
Legal Outcome:
The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo played a crucial role in documenting the crimes of the military dictatorship. They helped to bring international attention to the human rights abuses taking place in Argentina. Over time, their efforts contributed to the eventual repeal of the amnesty laws and the prosecution of military officials responsible for the disappearances. In some cases, the mothers have been involved in legal battles to identify the remains of their children, and the group continues to advocate for human rights and justice.
3. The Trial of the Junta (1985)
Case Overview:
In 1985, Argentina held the Trial of the Juntas, which was a landmark moment in the country's transition to democracy. The trial aimed to hold the top military officials accountable for the crimes committed during the Dirty War. It focused on the accountability of the leaders of the military junta, including General Jorge Rafael Videla and Admiral Emilio Massera, for their roles in orchestrating forced disappearances, torture, and killings.
Legal Outcome:
The trial led to the conviction of several members of the military junta, including Videla, who was sentenced to life in prison. This was a significant step toward achieving justice for the victims of the Dirty War. However, the effectiveness of these trials was temporarily undermined by the aforementioned Full Stop Law and Law of Due Obedience. These laws limited the prosecutions of lower-ranking officers and soldiers, leading to a reduction in the number of trials and convictions.
In the early 2000s, with the repeal of the amnesty laws, many of those convicted in the 1985 trial had their sentences reinstated or were retried. The Trial of the Juntas remains one of the most important moments in Argentina’s history of pursuing justice for human rights violations.
4. The Case of the Appropriated Children (Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo)
Case Overview:
During the military dictatorship, many pregnant women were abducted, and their children were taken away from them after birth. These children were often adopted by military families or others loyal to the regime, and their true identities were hidden. The Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo, a related human rights group, began a campaign to identify and reunite these children with their biological families.
Legal Outcome:
The Grandmothers were instrumental in pushing for legislation that allowed for the genetic testing of individuals to determine their true parentage. Many of the children were eventually found and reunited with their families. Legal cases related to the appropriation of children have continued, and the Argentine courts have been involved in identifying and prosecuting the individuals responsible for these crimes. As of today, over 130 "appropriated" children have been found.
5. The Case of "The Death Flights"
Case Overview:
One of the most horrific tactics used during the Dirty War was the so-called death flights, in which individuals who had been detained by the military were thrown alive from planes into the sea or into remote areas, ensuring their deaths. This practice was carried out to eliminate those who were believed to be threats to the junta, often without any trial or due process.
Legal Outcome:
The death flights became one of the most infamous symbols of Argentina’s dictatorship. In recent years, several trials have sought justice for the victims of these flights. In 2012, a major trial was held against the perpetrators of the death flights, and several military officers were convicted of crimes against humanity. The trial was notable for the testimony of survivors and relatives of the victims, as well as the presentation of physical evidence such as flight records and documents.
The case of the death flights helped to solidify the legal definition of crimes against humanity under Argentine law and reinforced the principle of accountability for such heinous crimes, even decades after they occurred.
Legal Reforms and International Impact
Argentina’s legal journey regarding human rights has been marked by both setbacks and progress. After the return of democracy in 1983, the country initially sought to put the horrors of the dictatorship behind it. However, the efforts of the victims’ families, human rights organizations, and the international community have helped Argentina reclaim a commitment to justice. The country’s experience has had a significant impact on international human rights law, particularly in the areas of accountability, transitional justice, and the prohibition of amnesties for serious human rights violations.
In the 21st century, Argentina’s continued prosecution of human rights violations committed during the dictatorship has set a global precedent, emphasizing the need for truth, reconciliation, and justice in the face of mass atrocities.
RELATED Blog
comments