Law of Evidence at Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone, a country in West Africa, follows a mixed legal system combining English common law, local customary law, and statutory law. The Law of Evidence in Sierra Leone is largely based on English common law principles, with specific local modifications and statutory laws.
Key Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Sierra Leone:
English Common Law Influence:
As a former British colony, Sierra Leone retains much of the English common law tradition. English laws related to evidence, particularly those under the Evidence Act of 1868, still play a significant role in Sierra Leone's legal system.
The Common Law rules regarding admissibility of evidence, burden of proof, witness testimony, and rules of evidence in criminal cases are applicable in Sierra Leone.
Evidence Act:
The Evidence Act (Cap. 50 of the Laws of Sierra Leone, 1960) is the main statutory law that governs the law of evidence in Sierra Leone. It incorporates elements of both common law and statutory modifications tailored to the Sierra Leonean legal system.
This Act provides rules on what evidence is admissible in both civil and criminal cases, including rules about oral testimony, documents, real evidence, and presumptions.
Types of Evidence:
Documentary Evidence: Written documents, contracts, letters, and other records are key evidence. In many cases, documents must be formally verified and authenticated to be admissible.
Testimonial Evidence: Oral testimony from witnesses is commonly used, with witnesses required to provide evidence under oath. The rules surrounding witness examination are derived from common law principles.
Physical Evidence: Physical or real evidence (such as objects or exhibits) is accepted in court, provided that it is relevant and legally obtained.
Expert Evidence: Expert witnesses, particularly in technical or specialized areas, may be called to testify and provide professional opinions in court.
Presumptions: The law recognizes certain presumptions, where facts may be inferred from other established facts.
Hearsay Evidence:
Generally, hearsay evidence (testimony about something someone else said outside of court) is inadmissible in Sierra Leone, unless it falls within certain statutory exceptions.
However, like in English law, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as statements against interest, dying declarations, and business records that are deemed reliable.
Burden of Proof:
In civil cases, the burden of proof lies on the plaintiff or the party making the claim. The standard is balance of probabilities (i.e., the case must be proven to be more likely than not).
In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proof and must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Criminal Evidence:
The Criminal Procedure Act governs the rules of evidence in criminal cases. Confessions, witness testimony, and physical evidence are all considered forms of evidence in criminal trials.
Confessions are only admissible if they are made voluntarily and without coercion, in line with both Sierra Leone's Constitution and international human rights standards.
Chain of custody is important in ensuring the integrity of physical evidence in criminal cases.
Judicial Discretion:
The judge in Sierra Leone has considerable discretion to assess the relevance and weight of evidence presented in court. The judge can also exclude evidence if it is deemed to be irrelevant or prejudicial.
This judicial discretion is part of the adversarial system followed in Sierra Leone, which is derived from English legal practices.
Customary Law:
Customary law plays a role in some matters, particularly in family law and land disputes. In these cases, customary evidence (such as oral testimony from local leaders or community elders) can be used, though it may be subject to the broader rules of statutory law and the Evidence Act.
Electronic Evidence:
With the increasing use of technology, electronic evidence (such as emails, text messages, and social media posts) is being accepted in Sierra Leone's courts, though its admissibility depends on issues of authentication, integrity, and reliability.
Evidence in electronic form must meet similar standards as traditional documents, particularly concerning the chain of custody and the preservation of data.
Appeals and Precedent:
The Court of Appeal of Sierra Leone has the authority to review evidence rulings made in lower courts. Like in other common law jurisdictions, precedent plays an important role in interpreting evidence law.
The Supreme Court is the highest court and has the final say on matters related to evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments