Law of Evidence at China
The Law of Evidence in China is governed by various statutes and regulations, with a focus on civil law principles and inquisitorial proceedings. The Chinese legal system is based on civil law traditions influenced by socialist legal theory, and evidence plays a significant role in the judicial process for both civil and criminal cases.
Key Sources of Evidence Law in China:
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (CPL) - This law governs the rules for civil trials and the use of evidence in civil litigation.
Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China - This governs criminal trials, including rules for evidence in criminal cases.
Evidence Rules - The Supreme People’s Court and Supreme People’s Procuratorate have issued judicial interpretations and regulations that provide more detailed rules about the handling of evidence in court proceedings.
Key Features of the Law of Evidence in China
1. Types of Evidence
China recognizes a variety of evidence types in both civil and criminal proceedings, including:
Documentary Evidence: Written documents, including contracts, agreements, official records, and other written materials, are essential in both civil and criminal cases. Electronic documents, such as emails and digital files, are also considered documentary evidence under Chinese law.
Testimonial Evidence: Oral testimony from parties involved in the case, witnesses, and experts. Testimonies must be given under oath, and witnesses may be examined by both the judge and the parties involved.
Physical Evidence: Tangible objects related to the case, such as weapons, drugs, stolen property, or other physical items.
Expert Evidence: Experts in fields like medicine, engineering, or forensics may be called to testify or provide opinions on technical matters relevant to the case.
Audio and Video Evidence: Recordings, such as video surveillance footage, audio recordings, or other forms of recorded evidence, are accepted under Chinese law if they meet the standards for authenticity.
Electronic Evidence: Digital evidence, such as emails, text messages, social media posts, and data from electronic devices (e.g., phones and computers), is increasingly relevant, particularly in commercial disputes, fraud cases, and cybercrime.
2. Admissibility of Evidence
The admissibility of evidence in China is based on the principles of relevance, legality, and authenticity:
Relevance: The evidence must be directly related to the case at hand. Irrelevant evidence may be excluded.
Legality: Evidence must be obtained in accordance with the law. Evidence obtained through illegal means (such as coercion or unlawful search and seizure) is typically inadmissible.
Authenticity: The party presenting the evidence must demonstrate that the evidence is authentic and has not been tampered with. In the case of digital evidence, it is necessary to prove that it has not been altered or manipulated.
Courts are tasked with ensuring that the evidence presented meets these standards. If the evidence is deemed unreliable or improperly obtained, it may be excluded.
3. Burden of Proof
In civil cases, the burden of proof typically lies with the plaintiff (the party bringing the case). The plaintiff must prove their claims by a preponderance of the evidence (i.e., showing that their version of events is more likely than not).
In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and they do not have to prove their innocence.
Criminal Defense: In some cases, the defendant may present evidence to challenge the prosecution's case or prove a defense, such as an alibi or self-defense.
4. Witness Testimony
Witnesses in China are important sources of evidence in both civil and criminal cases. Witnesses can testify about facts that they directly observed or heard.
Examination and Cross-examination: Witnesses are typically questioned by the judge and the parties involved in the case. In criminal cases, the defense has the right to cross-examine witnesses presented by the prosecution.
Expert Witnesses: The court may appoint expert witnesses to provide specialized knowledge on technical or complex issues. Expert opinions are considered part of the evidence presented to the court.
Witness Protection: In certain cases, particularly in criminal matters involving organized crime, witnesses may be provided protection to ensure their safety.
5. Documentary Evidence
Written Documents: Documents such as contracts, invoices, business records, and written agreements are key types of evidence. In civil cases, parties may rely heavily on documentary evidence to prove their claims.
Electronic Documents: Chinese law has expanded to recognize electronic documents as valid evidence, provided they meet the necessary requirements for authenticity and integrity. Electronic signatures, digital contracts, and emails are commonly used in business disputes and can be introduced as evidence in court.
Document Authentication: When presenting documents in court, parties must show that the documents are authentic. For example, contracts and agreements may need to be verified by a notary or third-party witness.
6. Exclusionary Rules
Illegally Obtained Evidence: Evidence obtained through illegal means, such as torture, coercion, or violations of rights, may be excluded from court proceedings. This is a safeguard to ensure that trials are conducted fairly.
Hearsay Evidence: Hearsay is generally inadmissible in Chinese courts, but exceptions exist. For example, statements made by individuals who cannot testify due to illness or unavailability may be admitted under specific conditions.
7. Role of the Judge
The judge in China plays a more active role than in some common law jurisdictions. Chinese judges are responsible for overseeing the investigation of the case, collecting evidence, and questioning witnesses.
In both civil and criminal cases, the judge evaluates the evidence presented and makes determinations based on the facts of the case. Judges may even request additional evidence or conduct investigations as needed.
Inquisitorial System: Unlike the adversarial systems used in common law countries, China follows an inquisitorial system where the judge plays an active role in managing and investigating the case. The judge’s role includes gathering evidence and ensuring the case proceeds smoothly.
8. Appeals and Review of Evidence
Appellate Courts: In China, appellate courts may review the evidence presented in a case to ensure that the law was applied correctly. However, appellate courts are generally more focused on legal issues than on re-evaluating the factual evidence.
New Evidence: In some circumstances, new evidence may be presented during the appeal if it was unavailable during the initial trial. However, new evidence is subject to strict scrutiny and must meet specific criteria for admissibility.
9. Digital Evidence
With the rise of technology, digital evidence (such as data from smartphones, computers, and online platforms) has become increasingly important in legal proceedings in China, particularly in criminal cases (e.g., cybercrime, fraud) and commercial disputes.
The Chinese Evidence Law and other related regulations provide guidelines for the collection, preservation, and admissibility of electronic evidence. Digital evidence must meet standards of authentication and chain of custody to be accepted in court.
Conclusion
The Law of Evidence in China is influenced by civil law traditions and the country’s inquisitorial legal system. Chinese courts place significant emphasis on the legality, relevance, and authenticity of evidence presented in court. Witness testimony, documentary evidence, expert opinions, and digital evidence play key roles in determining the outcome of legal proceedings. While evidence may be presented by both parties, the judge has a more active role in gathering and evaluating evidence compared to adversarial systems.
RELATED Blog
0 comments