Law of Evidence at San Marino
The Law of Evidence in San Marino is influenced by Italian civil law principles, as San Marino’s legal system is largely based on Italian law, due to its proximity and historical connections. San Marino’s legal system, while independent, is shaped by Roman law traditions, and its laws on evidence are contained in various statutory codes and judicial practices.
Here’s an overview of how evidence is handled in San Marino:
📘 Law of Evidence in San Marino
🔹 General Framework
San Marino follows a civil law system, which means the Code of Civil Procedure (Codice di Procedura Civile) and Penal Code (Codice Penale) play significant roles in the rules governing the presentation and admissibility of evidence. The primary sources are:
Codice di Procedura Civile (Civil Procedure Code)
Codice Penale (Penal Code)
Judicial Precedents: While San Marino is a small jurisdiction, the courts follow precedents and principles similar to those in Italy.
🔹 Key Aspects of the Law of Evidence
Relevance and Admissibility of Evidence:
Relevance: Evidence must be directly related to the facts in issue. It must serve to prove or disprove a fact that is in dispute in a case.
Admissibility: Evidence is only admissible if it is lawful and obtained through legal means. Evidence obtained unlawfully (e.g., through illegal search or coercion) may be excluded.
Types of Evidence:
Oral Evidence: Testimony from witnesses is a major source of evidence. Witnesses are required to swear an oath before testifying.
Documentary Evidence: Written documents (contracts, letters, official records, etc.) are often used as evidence in both civil and criminal cases. These must be authenticated to be admissible.
Real Evidence: Physical objects, such as weapons or other items relevant to the case, can be presented as real evidence.
Burden of Proof:
In civil cases, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof, which is to prove the facts of their claim on a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not).
In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proof and must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Presumptions: Certain facts may be presumed under the law, such as the presumption of the legality of actions performed by public officials.
Hearsay Evidence:
Hearsay (evidence based on statements made outside the court) is generally inadmissible, except in certain circumstances (e.g., statements made in the course of business, public records, or as part of the testimony of a deceased person).
Witness Testimony:
Examination: A witness will undergo direct examination, cross-examination, and re-examination.
Competence: Generally, all individuals are competent to testify, though there are exceptions for certain categories of people, such as minors or persons with mental incapacity.
Oath: Witnesses must swear an oath or affirmation to tell the truth before testifying.
Documentary Evidence and Authentication:
For a document to be used as evidence, it must typically be authenticated to verify its legitimacy. This can be done through witness testimony or expert analysis (e.g., handwriting experts).
In cases where the original document is not available, secondary evidence may be admitted under specific conditions.
Exclusionary Rules:
Certain evidence may be excluded if it violates legal standards or would cause undue prejudice to the case. This includes illegally obtained evidence or evidence that is irrelevant to the case at hand.
Expert Evidence:
Expert witnesses can be called upon to give opinions on matters outside the knowledge of ordinary people, such as forensic analysis, technical details, or medical issues. Their testimony must be based on their professional expertise and qualifications.
Electronic and Digital Evidence:
Like many modern legal systems, electronic evidence (emails, social media posts, digital records) is becoming more common in trials. It must meet standards of authenticity and reliability, and there are provisions for expert testimony to assess the integrity of electronic data.
Public Policy Considerations:
Public Interest: In some cases, public policy considerations may limit the admission of certain types of evidence, particularly if it is deemed to conflict with the public good (e.g., protecting national security or the privacy of individuals).
📜 Sources of Evidence Law in San Marino
Codice di Procedura Civile (Civil Procedure Code): Governs the admission of evidence in civil cases.
Codice Penale (Penal Code): Governs the rules for evidence in criminal cases.
Constitutional Principles: The Constitution of San Marino and human rights law set standards for fair trials and the protection of rights in the collection and admission of evidence.
Judicial Precedents: San Marino courts follow decisions made in earlier cases, particularly those consistent with Italian law and European Court of Human Rights rulings.
📊 Evidence in Criminal Cases
In criminal proceedings, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, which must establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Exclusion of Evidence: The courts are very careful about excluding evidence obtained illegally, such as through torture or undue influence.
Witness Protection: Special protections exist for vulnerable witnesses, such as minors or victims of serious crimes, which may include the ability to give testimony in private or through intermediaries.
RELATED Blog
0 comments