Law of Evidence at Hong Kong
In Hong Kong, the Law of Evidence is governed by a combination of statutory law, common law, and equity. The legal framework is shaped by Hong Kong's status as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, but it continues to operate under the common law system inherited from the United Kingdom. The Evidence Ordinance (Cap. 8) is the primary statute governing the law of evidence in Hong Kong, alongside other relevant laws and rules applicable to civil and criminal proceedings.
Key Features of the Law of Evidence in Hong Kong:
Relevance and Admissibility:
Evidence must be relevant to the issues in the case. Irrelevant evidence is generally inadmissible.
The admissibility of evidence is determined by the rules set out in the Evidence Ordinance and common law principles.
Types of Evidence:
Oral evidence: Testimonies given by witnesses under oath.
Documentary evidence: Written documents, electronic records, and contracts.
Real evidence: Physical objects presented in court (e.g., weapons, photographs).
Expert evidence: Testimony or reports from experts in fields such as forensic science, finance, or medicine.
Hearsay evidence: Hearsay is generally inadmissible in Hong Kong, but there are several exceptions, including statements made by an unavailable witness or out-of-court statements that fall within recognized exceptions (e.g., business records, public records).
Burden of Proof:
In criminal cases, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, which must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
In civil cases, the burden of proof is on the party making the claim (the plaintiff) and is generally satisfied by the balance of probabilities.
Witness Testimony:
Competency of witnesses: In general, all persons are competent to give evidence unless they are deemed to be unreliable (e.g., minors, mentally impaired individuals).
Compellability of witnesses: Witnesses may be compelled to testify, with exceptions such as legal professional privilege (e.g., lawyer-client communication) and spousal privilege.
Cross-examination: Cross-examination of witnesses is an important part of the adversarial system in Hong Kong and is allowed to challenge the credibility and reliability of witness testimony.
Hearsay Rule:
The hearsay rule is strict in Hong Kong, meaning that evidence of statements made outside of court is usually inadmissible. However, exceptions exist, such as:
Statements made by a person who is deceased or unavailable to testify.
Documents and statements that are part of regular business activities.
Public records or records of proceedings from other jurisdictions.
Privileges:
Legal Professional Privilege: Communications between a lawyer and client are generally protected from disclosure in court.
Spousal Privilege: One spouse cannot be compelled to testify against the other, unless specific exceptions apply (e.g., in cases of abuse or certain criminal activities).
Other Privileges: Certain communications may be protected by law, including those made to religious figures or in other confidential contexts.
Documentary Evidence:
Original documents must be produced in court whenever possible, though copies may be admissible if they meet the requirements for authenticity and reliability.
Electronic records and digital evidence: Electronic evidence (emails, text messages, digital documents) is recognized and can be admissible, provided that the court is satisfied with its authenticity and integrity.
Judicial Notice:
A court may take judicial notice of facts that are generally known or cannot reasonably be disputed (e.g., facts of public law, geographical knowledge, etc.).
Expert Evidence:
Expert evidence is permissible in both criminal and civil cases to assist the court in understanding specialized matters outside the common knowledge of the average person (e.g., forensic science, medical reports, financial analysis).
Experts must be qualified and their opinions should be based on reliable methods or techniques.
Electronic and Digital Evidence:
Digital evidence (e.g., emails, text messages, computer files) is admissible under the Evidence Ordinance as long as it can be authenticated and is relevant to the case.
Forensic evidence may be used in criminal cases, particularly in matters such as cybercrime or fraud, with proper protocols followed to ensure the evidence is preserved and presented accurately.
Procedure and Trial Practice:
The adversarial system of trial is followed in Hong Kong, where both parties present their evidence and challenge the evidence presented by the opposing party.
Judges have a critical role in deciding whether evidence is admissible, as well as in interpreting the law related to the evidence presented.
Presumptions:
Presumptions may apply in some cases, meaning the court can assume certain facts unless evidence is presented to the contrary (e.g., presumption of innocence in criminal trials, presumption of sanity unless proven otherwise).
The legal framework in Hong Kong is influenced by common law principles, but the city has also developed its own set of rules and procedures, particularly through the Evidence Ordinance (Cap. 8), which ensures that evidence is presented fairly and in accordance with established legal standards.
RELATED Blog
0 comments