Law of Evidence at Guinea
In Guinea, the Law of Evidence is shaped by its civil law system, which follows the French model. This means that evidence is governed by written statutes and codes, rather than judicial precedents. The legal framework for evidence in Guinea can be found in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Criminal Procedure, which outline how evidence is collected, presented, and evaluated in both civil and criminal cases.
Here are the key features of the Law of Evidence in Guinea:
đ Key Principles of Guinean Law of Evidence
Inquisitorial System
Similar to France, Guinea follows an inquisitorial system, where the judge plays an active role in investigating the facts of the case. In criminal cases, the judge can direct the investigation and gather evidence themselves. This is particularly true in pre-trial phases, where the judge has significant powers to collect evidence and question witnesses.
Admissibility of Evidence
Evidence in Guinea must be relevant to the case and obtained legally. There are no rigid rules for the exclusion of evidence in terms of hearsay or similar principles that exist in common law systems, but the evidence must comply with the broader principles of justice.
Evidence that is obtained through illegal means (such as torture or coercion) is typically excluded from consideration in the courts.
Types of Evidence
Witness Testimony: Witnesses play a crucial role in both civil and criminal cases. Testimonies must be taken under oath, and the judge has the authority to evaluate their credibility.
Documents: Written documents, such as contracts, official records, and communications, are key forms of evidence. They are often presented in civil cases to establish rights and obligations.
Expert Reports: Expert testimony (from doctors, forensic experts, etc.) is common in both civil and criminal cases. Experts provide opinions based on their specialized knowledge, which helps the judge understand technical aspects of the case.
Physical Evidence: Material objects (like weapons, stolen goods, etc.) are presented as evidence, especially in criminal trials.
Electronic Evidence: With the growing role of technology, electronic evidence such as emails, phone records, and digital files can be introduced, though they must meet the standards for authenticity.
Free Evaluation of Evidence
Like in many civil law systems, judges in Guinea are afforded broad discretion in evaluating the weight and relevance of evidence presented to them. They are not bound by rigid rules like in common law systems and must evaluate the evidence based on their personal judgment and the facts of the case.
Witnesses and Oaths
In Guinea, witnesses are compelled to testify, and their testimony is subject to cross-examination. They must take an oath or affirmation to tell the truth.
The right to silence is recognized in criminal cases, meaning that an accused person is not required to testify or answer questions that could incriminate them.
Burden of Proof
In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proof. The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
In civil cases, the burden of proof lies with the party making the claim. The standard of proof is typically the preponderance of evidence (i.e., the evidence shows that the claim is more likely than not true).
Exclusionary Rules
There are no formal exclusionary rules like the hearsay rule in Guineaâs legal system. However, illegally obtained evidence, such as through torture or without proper legal procedures, can be excluded from consideration.
Public vs. Private Nature of Evidence
Criminal trials are generally public unless there are special circumstances (such as national security concerns or the protection of vulnerable individuals).
Civil trials are often conducted in private, but the evidence presented in the court is public unless there are specific privacy concerns or the court decides otherwise.
đ Key Legal Texts
Code de Procédure Civile (Code of Civil Procedure): Governs the presentation of evidence in civil cases.
Code de Procédure Pénale (Code of Criminal Procedure): Governs the handling and evaluation of evidence in criminal cases.
đ Notable Features Compared to Other Systems
Role of Judges: The French influence on Guineaâs legal system means that judges in Guinea are more active in gathering and evaluating evidence than in common law systems, where lawyers typically control the presentation of evidence.
Flexibility in Evidence Evaluation: There is no strict reliance on rules like hearsay or relevance in the same way that common law systems operate, giving the judge more freedom in their evaluation.
Protection Against Illegally Obtained Evidence: Evidence obtained through illegal or unconstitutional means can be excluded, similar to the exclusionary rule in common law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments