Law of Evidence at DR Congo
The Law of Evidence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) is primarily governed by the Congolese Code of Civil Procedure (for civil matters) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (for criminal matters). While the legal system in DR Congo is influenced by the civil law tradition, inherited from Belgium, it also incorporates local customary law in certain situations.
Here is a general overview of the evidentiary rules and principles in DR Congo:
1. Types of Evidence Recognized
Documentary Evidence: Contracts, letters, receipts, and official documents are critical.
Testimonial Evidence: Witness statements are allowed but must be credible and relevant.
Expert Evidence: Experts can be called to interpret technical or specialized issues.
Presumptions: Both legal and factual presumptions are allowed, especially in civil cases.
Customary Evidence: In some regions, local customs and traditional methods of proving facts are accepted, especially in personal and family law.
2. Burden of Proof
Civil Cases: The party who asserts a fact bears the burden of proving it.
Criminal Cases: The prosecution bears the burden of proving the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Admissibility of Evidence
Evidence must be:
Relevant: Must relate directly to the facts of the case.
Legal: Collected and presented in accordance with Congolese law.
Not obtained through illegal means: Evidence obtained via torture or illegal search is generally inadmissible.
4. Testimony in Court
Witnesses may be summoned by either party or the court.
Cross-examination is permitted.
In some courts, testimony can be written or oral depending on the procedure.
5. Criminal Evidence Specifics
The Code of Criminal Procedure outlines how evidence is to be gathered and presented.
The role of the magistrate/judge is investigative in nature (inquisitorial system), especially in pre-trial phases.
6. Influence of Customary Law
Customary law is recognized, especially in rural areas and in matters such as inheritance, land rights, and marriage.
However, it must not contradict statutory law or human rights norms.

0 comments