General Practice Law at Western Sahara
General practice law in Western Sahara is exceptionally complex, highly contested, and effectively bifurcated due to the ongoing dispute over the territory's sovereignty. There isn't a single, unified, or universally recognized legal system in place.
Here's a breakdown of the legal realities on the ground:
1. The Disputed Status and Competing Legal Regimes:
Western Sahara is officially listed by the United Nations as a Non-Self-Governing Territory awaiting decolonization. Its legal status is undetermined under international law. This fundamental dispute directly impacts the legal framework.
Areas under Moroccan Control (approx. 80% of the territory):
Morocco considers Western Sahara its "Southern Provinces" and asserts full sovereignty.
In these areas, Moroccan law is applied. This means Moroccan civil, criminal, commercial, administrative, and public laws are enforced.
Moroccan courts and administrative structures operate.
Morocco's laws on property, business, and daily life are the de facto legal framework for residents and businesses within this zone.
However, from an international law perspective, Morocco's presence is considered an occupation, and thus, international humanitarian law (laws of occupation) should apply alongside Moroccan law, particularly concerning the rights of the Sahrawi people and the exploitation of natural resources (which requires the consent of the Sahrawi people). Courts like the CJEU have ruled against EU agreements with Morocco that include Western Sahara products without the consent of the Sahrawi people.
Areas under Polisario Front Control (approx. 20% of the territory, known as the "Liberated Territories" or "Free Zone"):
The Polisario Front (Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el-Hamra and Río de Oro), recognized by the UN as the legitimate representative of the Sahrawi people, proclaimed the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) in 1976.
The SADR has its own constitutional and legal framework, including a constitution, government, and judicial system.
However, the SADR's control is limited to a smaller, less populated, and largely desert eastern part of the territory, separated from the Moroccan-controlled areas by a vast sand wall (the Berm).
The laws applied in these areas are those promulgated by the SADR. Given the context of a liberation movement and limited resources, this legal system is likely less developed in terms of comprehensive commercial or complex civil codes compared to a fully functioning state, focusing more on administrative, criminal, and personal status laws.
2. International Law and its Role:
Right to Self-Determination: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1975 recognized the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination. This principle remains central to the international legal view of Western Sahara.
Non-Self-Governing Territory: The UN consistently lists Western Sahara as a non-self-governing territory, with Spain still technically the "de jure Administering Power" (though Spain ceded administrative control to Morocco and Mauritania in 1975). This means international obligations related to decolonization apply.
Laws of Occupation: For the Moroccan-controlled areas, international humanitarian law pertaining to military occupation is relevant. This includes rules on resource exploitation, human rights, and the treatment of the local population.
3. Challenges for "General Practice Law":
Lack of Legal Certainty: The overlapping and contested legal frameworks create immense legal uncertainty for residents, businesses, and international actors.
Human Rights Concerns: Human rights organizations frequently report abuses, restrictions on freedom of expression, assembly, and unfair trials, particularly in the Moroccan-controlled areas, where Sahrawi activists are often targeted.
Limited Access to Justice: Access to fair and independent justice is a significant concern for Sahrawis, especially those who do not recognize Moroccan sovereignty.
Resource Exploitation: Legal disputes frequently arise over the exploitation of Western Sahara's natural resources (e.g., phosphates, fisheries) by Morocco or foreign companies, with international courts often ruling that such activities require the consent of the Sahrawi people.
No Unified Bar or Legal Profession: There is no single, independent bar association or unified legal profession that operates across the entire territory. Lawyers would practice under either Moroccan law (in the occupied parts) or SADR law (in the liberated zones), often representing specific political or human rights interests.
In essence, "general practice law" in Western Sahara is not about a cohesive, stable system. Instead, it's about navigating a highly politicized and legally ambiguous environment where:
Most of the territory operates under Moroccan law, but this is legally challenged.
A smaller part of the territory operates under SADR law, but this is internationally recognized by some, but not all, states.
International law, particularly the right to self-determination and the laws of occupation, forms a critical overlay that impacts how national laws are viewed and challenged on the global stage.
Anyone considering legal practice or engagement in Western Sahara would need to be acutely aware of the complex political and international legal context, the de facto legal regimes in place, and the significant human rights challenges.
RELATED Blog
0 comments