The Marking of Heavy Packages Act, 1951
The Marking of Heavy Packages Act, 1951
Background and Purpose:
The Marking of Heavy Packages Act, 1951 was enacted to ensure safety in handling and transportation of heavy packages. The Act mandates that packages exceeding certain weights must be marked with information indicating the weight of the package. This helps handlers, carriers, and others involved in transportation to take appropriate precautions to avoid accidents, injuries, or damage to goods.
Objective:
To reduce accidents and injuries caused by improper handling of heavy packages.
To ensure that persons who carry or move heavy goods are aware of the weight and can take necessary precautions.
To impose liability on the sender or consignor to correctly mark the weight on heavy packages.
Applicability:
The Act applies to all packages that exceed a prescribed weight limit, usually set by the government through notification.
It covers packages transported by road, rail, water, or air within India.
The marking must be clear, legible, and in the prescribed form (often on the outside of the package).
Key Provisions of the Act:
1. Marking Requirement (Section 2)
Any package that exceeds the prescribed weight limit must bear a clear mark indicating the actual weight of the package.
The weight must be marked on each package or container.
Marking must be done in a manner visible to the handlers and carriers.
2. Liability for Non-Compliance (Section 3)
The person who sends or consigns the package must ensure the correct marking.
If a package is not properly marked, and this causes injury, damage, or loss, the consignor is liable to pay compensation.
3. Penalty Provisions (Section 4)
Failure to comply with the marking requirements attracts penalties.
Penalties may include fines or other sanctions as prescribed by the Act or rules.
Importance of the Act:
The Act promotes workplace safety, especially for laborers and transport workers who physically handle heavy packages.
Helps avoid damage to goods by alerting handlers about the weight.
Ensures accountability of consignors in safe transportation practices.
Protects employers, transport companies, and workers from avoidable accidents.
Relevant Case Laws:
1. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (1995 AIR Mad 115)
Issue: Liability of consignor for injury caused to workers due to improper marking.
Held: The court held that under the Marking of Heavy Packages Act, the consignor is responsible for correct marking. Failure to mark correctly leading to injury imposes liability on the consignor for damages.
Principle: Emphasized consignor’s duty to ensure proper marking to safeguard workers.
2. Shiv Kumar v. State Transport Authority (1960)
Issue: Whether a transporter can be held liable for accidents arising due to improper marking.
Held: The court ruled that primary liability lies with the consignor to mark packages correctly. Transporters must also ensure packages are safely handled but are not primarily responsible for marking.
Principle: Duty to mark lies with consignor; transporter’s responsibility is limited to handling.
3. Union of India v. Ram Singh (1968)
Issue: Penalty imposed for failure to mark heavy packages.
Held: The court upheld the imposition of fines under the Act for consignors who failed to mark heavy packages as required.
Principle: Strict compliance with marking requirements is mandatory.
Summary:
The Marking of Heavy Packages Act, 1951 mandates that heavy packages must be marked clearly with their actual weight.
The Act assigns responsibility primarily to the consignor or sender to ensure proper marking.
Failure to comply can result in legal liability and penalties.
The Act aims at protecting handlers, carriers, and transport workers by providing necessary information for safe handling.
Courts have consistently upheld the principle that marking is a mandatory safety measure and that non-compliance results in legal consequences.
RELATED Blog
0 comments