Refugee Policy in India: Legal Ambiguity around Rohingyas and Afghans
India’s refugee policy remains complex and marked by legal ambiguity, especially concerning two prominent refugee groups—the Rohingyas from Myanmar and Afghans displaced by recent conflicts. Unlike many countries, India does not have a comprehensive national legal framework specifically governing refugees, which leads to uncertainties in protection, rights, and legal status. This article explores India’s existing legal landscape, the challenges faced by Rohingya and Afghan refugees, and recent judicial and policy developments highlighting this legal ambiguity.
India’s Refugee Policy: An Overview
- Absence of a Dedicated Refugee Law: India has not enacted a specific law on refugees or asylum seekers. Instead, it relies on general constitutional provisions, executive orders, and international obligations interpreted in a domestic context.
- Constitutional Protections: Refugees are entitled to fundamental rights under the Constitution of India, particularly Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and Article 14 (Right to Equality), although these are subject to immigration and public order laws.
- Foreigners Act, 1946 and Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920: The primary statutes regulating entry, stay, and deportation of foreigners, often applied to refugees, sometimes leading to detention or deportation without specific refugee protections.
- International Obligations: India is a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention’s Protocol but has not ratified the Convention itself, thus not legally bound by its provisions. The principle of non-refoulement is often invoked in Indian courts based on customary international law.
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Role: UNHCR operates in India to identify and assist refugees, issue identity cards, and advocate for their protection, but its authority is limited by the absence of a formal domestic framework.
Legal Ambiguity Surrounding Rohingya Refugees
- Large Rohingya Population: India hosts an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 Rohingya refugees, primarily in Jammu, Hyderabad, and Delhi.
- Government Stance and Deportation Orders: The Indian government considers Rohingyas as illegal immigrants and has repeatedly issued orders for their detention and deportation on grounds of national security and public order.
- Supreme Court and High Court Interventions: Courts have issued mixed rulings. For instance, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court has stayed some deportation orders, emphasizing the principle of non-refoulement under Article 21. However, the Supreme Court has refused to grant blanket relief, underscoring the government’s sovereign right to regulate foreigners.
- Detention and Human Rights Concerns: Many Rohingya refugees face detention under the Foreigners Act without trial or adequate legal recourse, raising human rights issues flagged by NHRC and civil society.
Afghan Refugees and Legal Challenges
- Increased Influx Post-2021: Following the Taliban takeover, India witnessed an influx of Afghan nationals, including those fleeing persecution, journalists, and minority groups.
- No Formal Refugee Status: Afghan arrivals generally receive temporary visas or stay permits but lack formal refugee status or legal protection under Indian law.
- Vulnerabilities and Access Issues: Afghan refugees face difficulties accessing education, employment, healthcare, and legal aid, exacerbated by ambiguous legal recognition and risk of detention or deportation.
- Judicial and Government Response: Some High Courts have directed state governments to facilitate basic services for Afghan nationals on humanitarian grounds. The Ministry of Home Affairs issued guidelines in 2023 to streamline visa extensions but avoided formal refugee protections.
Key Legal and Policy Challenges
- No Comprehensive Refugee Law: The absence of a dedicated legal framework results in inconsistent treatment and legal insecurity for refugees.
- Security and Public Order Concerns: The government prioritizes national security, often conflating refugees with illegal immigrants, leading to detention and deportation measures.
- Limited Legal Recourse: Refugees frequently lack access to courts, legal aid, or effective mechanisms to challenge their detention or deportation.
- Discrimination and Social Exclusion: Refugees, especially Rohingyas, face social hostility and marginalization, hindering integration.
- International Law vs Domestic Policy: India’s non-ratification of the 1951 Refugee Convention limits enforceability of international refugee rights domestically.
Recent Judicial Developments
- Supreme Court on Non-Refoulement: In 2024, the Supreme Court reiterated the principle of non-refoulement as a binding norm under customary international law, cautioning against deporting refugees to countries where their lives are at risk.
- High Court Interventions: Various High Courts have issued orders ensuring refugees receive basic humanitarian aid and protection against illegal detention, referencing Article 21 and India’s obligations under international human rights law.
- NHRC and NHRI Reports: The NHRC has issued recommendations urging humane treatment of refugees, improved detention conditions, and expedited legal processes.
Possible Way Forward
- Enactment of a Refugee Law: Legal experts and civil society advocate for a comprehensive refugee law recognizing asylum seekers, defining procedures, and ensuring protection in line with international standards.
- Clearer Policy Guidelines: The government needs to articulate transparent policies differentiating refugees from illegal migrants, balancing security and humanitarian concerns.
- Enhanced Legal Aid and Access: Establishment of legal aid cells and faster judicial review mechanisms to protect refugee rights.
- Integration Measures: Policies promoting access to education, healthcare, and livelihood for refugees to foster social inclusion.
- Cooperation with International Agencies: Strengthened collaboration with UNHCR and other stakeholders to improve refugee protection.
Conclusion
India’s refugee policy remains marked by significant legal ambiguity, especially for Rohingya and Afghan refugees, who face precarious legal status and protection gaps. While judicial interventions and international principles like non-refoulement provide some safeguards, the lack of a dedicated refugee law hampers consistent protection. As India continues to receive refugees amid regional conflicts and crises, a more coherent legal and policy framework is essential to balance security concerns with humanitarian obligations under constitutional and international law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments