Law of Evidence at Belgium
The Law of Evidence in Belgium is primarily governed by the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional regulations found in specific statutes or regulations depending on the nature of the case (civil, criminal, administrative, etc.). The Belgian legal system operates under a civil law tradition, and evidence plays a crucial role in both civil and criminal proceedings.
Key Features of Evidence Law in Belgium
1. Types of Evidence in Belgium
Evidence in Belgian law can take several forms, depending on the nature of the case:
Documents: This includes contracts, invoices, written statements, and other physical or electronic documents. In some cases, digital documents, including emails and texts, are also considered.
Witness Testimony: Witnesses may be called to provide testimony in both civil and criminal cases. Their statements are evaluated by the judge(s) for credibility and relevance.
Expert Evidence: Experts may be brought in to provide specialized knowledge on certain issues. This is particularly common in areas such as forensics, accounting, or technical subjects.
Physical Evidence: Objects or materials relevant to the case, such as weapons, clothing, or other tangible items.
Audio and Video Evidence: Recordings such as phone calls, security footage, or any other form of recorded material can be presented in court.
Electronic Evidence: This includes data from computers, mobile phones, or other electronic devices. In the digital age, electronic evidence is increasingly important in both civil and criminal trials.
2. Admissibility of Evidence
The basic principles of evidence admissibility in Belgium include:
Relevance: The evidence must be relevant to the case. Evidence that does not directly relate to the matter at hand is typically inadmissible.
Legality: Evidence that is obtained in violation of the law is generally inadmissible. For example, evidence obtained through illegal searches or coercion may be excluded from the proceedings.
Authenticity: The party presenting the evidence must prove that it is authentic and genuine. In the case of documents, this may involve demonstrating that they have not been forged or altered.
Courts can assess the probative value of evidence but cannot be compelled to accept all evidence presented, even if it is deemed relevant and lawful.
3. Burden of Proof
In civil cases, the burden of proof typically rests on the plaintiff (the party making a claim). The plaintiff must present evidence to support their claims and prove their case on the balance of probabilities (preponderance of the evidence).
In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense may attempt to challenge the evidence presented but does not have the burden of proof unless they introduce evidence in their favor (e.g., an alibi).
4. Witnesses
In Belgium, witnesses are an important source of evidence. Both parties can call witnesses to testify in court.
Witnesses can be questioned by both the parties (in adversarial proceedings) or by the judge (in inquisitorial proceedings, especially in criminal cases).
Expert witnesses may be appointed by the court to provide testimony on specialized matters.
5. Documentary Evidence
Documentary evidence plays a significant role in Belgian law, particularly in civil cases. Written contracts, letters, emails, invoices, and other forms of written communication can be used to prove claims.
Electronic documents are increasingly recognized as legitimate forms of evidence, provided they meet certain conditions such as authentication.
6. Exclusionary Rules
Illegally obtained evidence: Evidence obtained through unlawful means, such as illegal surveillance or violations of privacy, is typically excluded. The right to a fair trial, protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, ensures that evidence obtained through violation of fundamental rights is not admitted in court.
Hearsay Evidence: Hearsay (statements made outside of court) may be admissible under certain conditions in Belgium, especially if it is deemed reliable and necessary for the case.
7. Presumptions
Belgian law contains certain legal presumptions that are used to facilitate the decision-making process. For example, there might be presumptions about the validity of certain documents or the existence of specific facts.
8. Role of the Judge
In civil cases, the Belgian judicial system follows an inquisitorial system, meaning that judges play a more active role in the investigation of the facts of the case, gathering evidence, and directing the proceedings. The judge may, for example, order the production of documents or require certain witnesses to testify.
In criminal cases, judges also investigate facts to some extent but may rely more heavily on the prosecutor's role. Belgium has an inquisitorial system for criminal matters, where the judge has the authority to instruct the police and direct investigations.
9. Digital and Electronic Evidence
Digital evidence, such as emails, digital communications, and computer files, is increasingly used in both civil and criminal proceedings. Belgian courts require that digital evidence meet the same standards of admissibility as physical documents or physical objects.
In criminal cases, the police may conduct investigations involving computers and electronic devices to uncover digital evidence, subject to judicial approval and respecting privacy rights.
10. Witness Protection and Anonymity
In certain circumstances, such as in organized crime cases, Belgium allows for witness protection programs to ensure the safety of individuals who may be at risk due to their testimony.
The court may also allow witnesses to testify anonymously in exceptional cases where there is a legitimate threat to their safety, though this is subject to strict conditions.
11. Appeals and Evidence
In cases of appeal, the higher court generally does not re-evaluate the evidence but instead reviews whether the lower court applied the law correctly, including the admissibility and evaluation of evidence.
However, in some instances, if new evidence comes to light or if there was a procedural error in the evaluation of evidence, an appeal court may reconsider certain evidence.
Conclusion
The Law of Evidence in Belgium is designed to ensure that evidence presented in court is both relevant and obtained legally. The system places a significant emphasis on the fairness of the trial process, with courts ensuring that evidence is properly handled and that the rights of the parties involved are respected. The use of expert testimony, documentary evidence, and modern technology like electronic evidence is increasingly important in both civil and criminal cases in Belgium.
RELATED Blog
0 comments