Handcuffing Is Not Routine: Supreme Court Warns Police Again

In a stern reminder to the police, the Supreme Court ruled that handcuffing a person during arrest is not an automatic right — it must be justified, recorded, and approved.

Why? Because dignity doesn’t get thrown away just because someone’s accused.

The Case

A Dalit activist was arrested for organizing a protest. Videos showed him being paraded in handcuffs despite no violent behaviour or flight risk.

He moved the court — and justice followed.

What the Court Held

Article 21 guarantees personal dignity

• Handcuffing is allowed only if there’s a clear threat of violence or escape

• Police must record reasons in writing and seek judicial permission

Impact on Law Enforcement

• SOPs for arrest protocols must now include detailed justifications

• Human rights commissions can act faster on complaints

• Law students and civil society groups can file PILs on misuse

Liberty doesn't vanish at arrest. It must be upheld through due process.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments