Arbitration Law in Uzbekistan
Arbitration Law in Uzbekistan is governed by the Arbitration Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2012), which establishes the legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration in the country. The law aims to promote arbitration as an effective means of resolving disputes and is aligned with international standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Key Features of Arbitration Law in Uzbekistan:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Law of 2012: The Arbitration Law was enacted to regulate arbitration in Uzbekistan. The law applies to both commercial disputes and civil matters where arbitration is chosen by the parties.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: The law is largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law (adopted in 1985), which sets out internationally accepted principles for conducting arbitration and enforcing arbitration agreements and awards.
- Uzbekistan is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Uzbekistan.
2. Scope and Applicability
- Commercial Arbitration: Arbitration is applicable to commercial disputes involving individuals or legal entities, both domestic and foreign. This includes contract disputes, property disputes, and other commercial matters.
- Exclusions: Certain types of disputes, such as those related to family law, inheritance, or criminal matters, are excluded from arbitration under Uzbek law. Additionally, some disputes cannot be arbitrated if they are deemed to be in the public interest or are explicitly excluded by law.
- International Arbitration: The law allows for international arbitration and aligns with international treaties and conventions to facilitate the resolution of cross-border disputes.
3. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: For arbitration to be binding, there must be an arbitration agreement between the parties. This agreement must be in writing, either as part of a contract or as a separate agreement.
- Form: The arbitration agreement must clearly specify the intention of the parties to submit disputes to arbitration, as well as the rules and procedures that will govern the arbitration.
- Scope: The agreement should define the scope of disputes to be submitted to arbitration. If the scope of the arbitration agreement is unclear, a court may need to intervene to determine whether a particular dispute falls within the arbitration agreement.
4. Arbitral Tribunal
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are free to appoint their own arbitrators. The number of arbitrators is typically odd (usually one or three) to avoid deadlock. If the parties cannot agree on the number or appointment of arbitrators, the law allows the court to appoint arbitrators.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators must be impartial and independent, and any conflict of interest should be disclosed before the appointment. If an arbitrator is not impartial, they can be challenged and replaced by the parties or a court.
- Qualifications: There are no specific qualifications for arbitrators under the law, but parties typically choose arbitrators based on their expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
5. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: The parties have significant autonomy in determining the procedure for arbitration. They can choose the rules of arbitration, the location of the arbitration, and the language of the proceedings.
- Default Procedure: If the parties fail to agree on the procedure, the arbitration tribunal has the authority to set the rules and manage the process, ensuring fairness and due process.
- Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings are typically confidential unless the parties agree otherwise or the law requires disclosure. This confidentiality extends to the arbitrators, the parties, and any third parties involved in the arbitration.
- Representation: Parties can be represented by legal professionals, including lawyers and other authorized individuals, during the arbitration process.
6. Arbitral Awards
- Binding and Final: An arbitral award in Uzbekistan is final and binding on the parties, subject to very limited grounds for appeal or review.
- Grounds for Challenge: The grounds for challenging an award are limited to cases where:
- The arbitrators exceeded their powers or failed to follow the arbitration agreement.
- The award is obtained by fraud or corruption.
- The party was not given a fair opportunity to present its case, leading to a violation of due process.
- The award is contrary to public policy in Uzbekistan.
- Correction or Interpretation: The arbitral tribunal can correct errors in the award, such as mathematical mistakes or clerical errors, or interpret parts of the award if needed.
7. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Enforcement: An arbitral award made under Uzbek law can be enforced in Uzbekistan by applying to a court for recognition and enforcement. The court will typically enforce the award unless there are valid reasons to set it aside.
- International Enforcement: Uzbekistan is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, meaning that foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Uzbekistan, subject to the same limited grounds for refusal as set out in the Convention.
- Public Policy: Foreign awards may be refused recognition or enforcement in Uzbekistan if they are deemed to be contrary to Uzbek public policy.
8. Judicial Intervention
- Limited Judicial Review: The courts in Uzbekistan are generally supportive of arbitration and intervene only in limited circumstances. Courts can assist with the appointment of arbitrators, the enforcement of awards, and in cases where there is a challenge to the award.
- Support for Arbitration: Courts may assist with procedures such as taking evidence or compelling the production of documents in arbitration, but they should not interfere in the substantive resolution of the dispute.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Uzbekistan
- Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UzCCI): The Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UzCCI) provides arbitration services through its Arbitration Court, offering an institutional framework for resolving disputes in a variety of sectors.
- Other Institutions: There are also other domestic arbitration institutions and international bodies operating in Uzbekistan, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which offer arbitration services for disputes involving international parties.
10. Recent Trends and Developments
- Arbitration Reforms: Uzbekistan has been undergoing legal reforms to strengthen its arbitration framework and promote the use of arbitration in both domestic and international commercial disputes.
- Attraction for Foreign Investment: Due to its commitment to arbitration and alignment with international conventions, Uzbekistan is positioning itself as a more attractive jurisdiction for foreign investment and international dispute resolution.
- Use of Technology: Like many other countries, Uzbekistan is seeing a growing interest in the use of online dispute resolution (ODR) and virtual arbitration platforms, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has made remote arbitration more feasible and efficient.
Conclusion
Uzbekistan’s arbitration framework, governed by the Arbitration Law of 2012, is in line with international standards, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention, making it a favorable jurisdiction for both domestic and international arbitration. The law provides flexibility and party autonomy while ensuring that arbitration awards are final and binding. With a growing commitment to supporting arbitration, Uzbekistan is positioning itself as a key player in the region for resolving commercial disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments