Arbitration Law in Iceland
Arbitration Law in Iceland
Iceland has a modern and well-developed legal framework for arbitration, making it an attractive jurisdiction for both domestic and international disputes. The Icelandic legal system supports arbitration through a combination of national legislation and adherence to international standards, ensuring efficient and impartial dispute resolution.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration
Iceland’s arbitration system is governed primarily by the Arbitration Act of 1999 (No. 25/1999). This act is largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and aligns with international best practices.
Arbitration Act (No. 25/1999): The key piece of legislation that regulates both domestic and international arbitration in Iceland. The Act covers a wide range of issues such as the arbitration agreement, the appointment of arbitrators, the arbitration procedure, and the enforcement of arbitral awards. This Act incorporates provisions from the UNCITRAL Model Law to ensure compatibility with international arbitration practices.
UNCITRAL Model Law: Iceland's Arbitration Act is consistent with the UNCITRAL Model Law, which is widely accepted across many jurisdictions as a standard for international commercial arbitration.
New York Convention: Iceland is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). As a result, foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Iceland, and Icelandic awards can be enforced internationally, provided they meet the requirements under the Convention.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Form and Requirements: An arbitration agreement must be in writing, which includes contracts, letters, or electronic communications where the intention to resolve disputes through arbitration is clear.
Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are generally enforceable in Iceland. If a party refuses to comply with an arbitration agreement, the other party can seek judicial enforcement, and Icelandic courts are supportive of upholding arbitration agreements.
Scope: Arbitration agreements can cover a wide range of disputes, particularly commercial and contractual issues. Certain matters, such as family law, criminal law, and insolvency matters, are not subject to arbitration under Icelandic law.
3. Appointment of Arbitrators
Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators. If the parties do not agree, the default number is one arbitrator, or in some cases, three arbitrators.
Qualification of Arbitrators: Arbitrators in Iceland must be independent and impartial. The parties are free to determine the qualifications and expertise of the arbitrators. In practice, arbitrators with expertise in commercial law, construction, and other specific fields are often appointed.
Appointment Process: The parties are free to agree on how the arbitrators should be appointed. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, the Icelandic court can appoint one for them. In addition, the Icelandic Chamber of Commerce and other institutions can also assist in the appointment process.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Flexibility: Iceland’s arbitration law is designed to provide flexibility. The parties can agree on the rules and procedures governing the arbitration. If they do not reach an agreement, the arbitrators have the authority to set the rules of procedure.
Seat of Arbitration: The parties are free to choose the seat of the arbitration, and it can be in Iceland or another jurisdiction. If the parties do not specify a seat, the arbitrators will determine the location.
Language: The parties can choose the language of the arbitration. If no language is specified, the arbitrators will determine the language based on the circumstances of the case.
Interim Measures: Arbitrators in Iceland have the authority to grant interim measures to protect the interests of the parties. These can include orders for the preservation of evidence or the freezing of assets. Icelandic courts also have the power to grant interim relief in support of arbitration.
5. Role of Courts in Arbitration
Judicial Support: Icelandic courts are generally supportive of the arbitration process. They assist with the appointment of arbitrators, provide interim relief, and enforce arbitration agreements.
Compelling Arbitration: If one party refuses to comply with an arbitration agreement, the other party can request the Icelandic court to compel arbitration. Courts in Iceland will typically uphold the arbitration agreement unless there are valid grounds for invalidating it.
Interim Relief: Icelandic courts can issue interim orders to support arbitration proceedings. These orders can include injunctions or measures to preserve evidence or assets before or during the arbitration process.
Setting Aside an Award: An arbitral award may be set aside by an Icelandic court on limited grounds, such as:
- Lack of Jurisdiction: If the arbitrators did not have jurisdiction to hear the case.
- Procedural Irregularities: If the arbitration process violated basic principles of due process or fairness.
- Public Policy: If the award violates Icelandic public policy.
6. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards: Arbitral awards made in Iceland are automatically enforceable within the country, and enforcement can be sought through the Icelandic courts without the need for separate recognition proceedings.
Foreign Awards: As a signatory to the New York Convention, Iceland recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards. A foreign award can be enforced in Iceland after applying to the court, and the court will recognize the award unless there are specific grounds for refusal under the Convention (such as public policy concerns).
7. Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in Iceland are generally confidential, unless the parties agree otherwise. This confidentiality extends to the arbitration process, the submissions made by the parties, and the arbitral award itself. However, an award can be published if both parties agree to this in advance.
8. Arbitration Institutions
Iceland has a number of institutions and organizations that support the arbitration process, including the Icelandic Chamber of Commerce (Íslensk Viðskiptaráð) and other specialized arbitral bodies. These institutions assist in the appointment of arbitrators, administering arbitral procedures, and enforcing awards.
9. Challenges and Opportunities
Challenges: The key challenges for arbitration in Iceland may include the relatively small market for arbitration compared to other international arbitration hubs. There is also a need for greater awareness of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism among businesses.
Opportunities: Despite the challenges, Iceland offers a stable legal and political environment, a strong legal tradition, and a neutral location for international arbitration, especially for disputes involving Nordic or European parties. The supportive judicial framework and adherence to international standards make Iceland a promising jurisdiction for arbitration.
10. Conclusion
Iceland has a strong, modern legal framework for arbitration, which aligns with international standards such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention. The Arbitration Act (1999) provides flexibility and clarity in regulating arbitration proceedings, and Icelandic courts are supportive of the arbitration process. With a growing emphasis on commercial arbitration, Iceland is well-positioned as a neutral and efficient venue for resolving both domestic and international disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments