Arbitration Law in Burundi
Arbitration Law in Burundi
Burundi, like many other African countries, has a legal framework for arbitration that encourages the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for both domestic and international disputes. The country’s arbitration law aligns with international standards, especially with the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention, which ensures the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
The legal framework governing arbitration in Burundi is primarily based on the Burundian Arbitration Act and its commitments under the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) system.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Burundi
Arbitration Law
- The main Arbitration Law in Burundi provides the legal basis for commercial arbitration, covering both domestic and international disputes. While Burundi does not have an extensive standalone arbitration statute, the Burundian Civil Code and provisions from OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) influence its arbitration law.
- OHADA is a key aspect for arbitration in Burundi. It is a treaty organization of 17 African countries that have adopted a uniform arbitration law, known as the OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration, which regulates arbitration within its member states, including Burundi.
OHADA and the Uniform Act on Arbitration
- Burundi is a member of OHADA (founded in 1993), which harmonizes commercial law across the region. The OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration (adopted in 1999) provides a unified legal framework for arbitration proceedings in all OHADA member states, including Burundi. The Act governs the appointment of arbitrators, the arbitration procedure, the enforcement of awards, and the recognition of arbitral decisions.
- OHADA’s system is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law and is known for providing a flexible, predictable, and efficient framework for arbitration.
New York Convention (1958)
- Burundi is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which ensures that foreign arbitral awards rendered in jurisdictions that are also signatories to the Convention can be enforced in Burundi. The Convention helps improve Burundi’s status as a viable jurisdiction for international arbitration and enhances its legal credibility in global commercial relations.
2. Key Features of Arbitration in Burundi
Arbitration Agreement
- An arbitration agreement must be in writing to be valid in Burundi. This agreement can be a separate clause within a larger contract or an independent contract by itself. It must clearly indicate the parties' intention to resolve any disputes through arbitration rather than through litigation.
- The agreement should specify important details, such as:
- The number of arbitrators (usually one or three).
- The seat of arbitration (jurisdiction or location of the arbitration).
- The rules under which the arbitration will be conducted (such as UNCITRAL, OHADA, or institutional rules).
Arbitral Tribunal
- The number of arbitrators can be determined by the parties, but the default is generally three arbitrators, unless they agree on a different number.
- Arbitrators must be impartial, independent, and have sufficient expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
- If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the OHADA system allows for the appointment to be made by a relevant arbitral body or the courts.
Arbitration Procedure
- Arbitration in Burundi is flexible, with the parties free to agree on the rules and procedures for the arbitration process. This can include OHADA arbitration rules, UNCITRAL rules, or other institutional arbitration rules.
- The arbitral tribunal is empowered to set the procedural rules for the dispute, including timelines, the submission of evidence, and the conduct of hearings.
- The tribunal may grant interim measures during the arbitration process if necessary.
Language of Arbitration
- The language of arbitration is generally chosen by the parties involved. If no agreement is reached, the arbitral tribunal will determine the language, which will likely be based on the language of the contract or the practical circumstances.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
Minimal Judicial Intervention
- In Burundi, as in many other countries with modern arbitration frameworks, there is a strong preference for minimal judicial intervention in arbitration proceedings. The court's role is limited to specific functions such as:
- Enforcing arbitration agreements.
- Appointing arbitrators if the parties fail to do so.
- Enforcing arbitral awards.
- Setting aside awards under certain conditions.
Setting Aside an Arbitral Award
- An arbitral award in Burundi may only be set aside on limited grounds, which typically include:
- Lack of a valid arbitration agreement.
- The tribunal exceeding its powers.
- Serious procedural errors, such as failing to give a party a chance to present its case.
- The award being contrary to Burundi’s public policy.
Court’s Role in Interim Measures
- Although the arbitral tribunal can issue interim measures, the Burundian courts can also intervene in granting interim measures in urgent situations to protect assets or prevent harm during the arbitration process.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Arbitral Awards
- Domestic arbitral awards in Burundi can be enforced through the Burundian courts without the need for recognition, making it simpler for parties to execute a local award.
- Foreign Arbitral Awards
- Foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable in Burundi under the provisions of the New York Convention (1958), which means that awards made in foreign jurisdictions (signatories to the Convention) can be enforced in Burundi.
- The courts in Burundi will generally enforce foreign awards unless they find that:
- The award is contrary to Burundi’s public policy.
- There has been a violation of due process or procedural fairness.
- The award was issued by a tribunal that did not have jurisdiction.
5. Arbitration Institutions in Burundi
Burundi Arbitration Centre
- While Burundi does not have a prominent local arbitration institution on the scale of larger international bodies, the Burundi Arbitration Centre is a key institution that offers arbitration services within the country. It provides a neutral venue for the resolution of commercial disputes and offers an institutional framework for domestic and international arbitration.
OHADA Arbitration
- Burundi, as a member of OHADA, can also access the OHADA Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), which offers arbitration services for disputes between parties in OHADA member states.
International Arbitration Institutions
- Burundi allows for the use of international arbitration institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), especially for cross-border commercial disputes.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in Burundi
Harmonized Arbitration Framework
- As a member of OHADA, Burundi benefits from a harmonized and modern arbitration system that is compatible with international best practices. This reduces legal uncertainties and provides clarity for international investors and businesses.
Enforcement of Foreign Awards
- Burundi’s commitment to the New York Convention ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced under international law, making the country an attractive jurisdiction for international trade and commerce.
Confidentiality
- Arbitration in Burundi typically offers confidentiality, which is a key advantage for businesses that wish to avoid public disclosure of sensitive commercial information.
Flexibility and Speed
- The flexibility of arbitration procedures, as well as the ability to resolve disputes more quickly than through litigation, makes arbitration an attractive option for businesses operating in Burundi.
7. Challenges and Considerations
Limited Awareness in Some Sectors
- While arbitration is recognized, local businesses in Burundi may still have limited awareness of the benefits of arbitration. This could hinder the widespread adoption of arbitration, especially in smaller or less sophisticated business sectors.
Costs of Arbitration
- The costs associated with arbitration, particularly international arbitration involving large sums, can be substantial. However, the ability to avoid lengthy litigation may make arbitration more cost-effective in the long run.
Conclusion
Burundi offers a modern and flexible legal framework for arbitration, largely influenced by the OHADA system, which harmonizes commercial law across several African countries. The country's commitment to the New York Convention and its integration into OHADA provide a strong foundation for international and domestic arbitration. Arbitration in Burundi is a viable and increasingly attractive option for resolving commercial disputes, especially with its pro-arbitration laws, minimal judicial intervention, and access to a range of international arbitration institutions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments