Arbitration Law in Finland
Arbitration Law in Finland
Arbitration in Finland is governed by the Arbitration Act (Laki välimiesmenettelystä, 967/1992), which is in line with international best practices, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Finland's legal framework for arbitration is modern and flexible, making it an attractive destination for both domestic and international arbitration. Finland is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), ensuring the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Finland
The Arbitration Act in Finland provides the general rules governing arbitration proceedings. The Act applies to both domestic and international arbitration, and it gives parties significant autonomy in selecting the procedures, arbitrators, and even the venue for arbitration. The law also allows for a broad range of dispute types to be resolved through arbitration, primarily focusing on commercial matters but also extending to certain non-commercial disputes if the parties agree.
2. Key Features of the Arbitration Act in Finland
The Arbitration Act provides a clear and modern framework for the arbitration process. Key features include:
Arbitration Agreement:
The Arbitration Act requires that arbitration agreements be in writing. These can be clauses in contracts or separate agreements. Arbitration agreements must reflect the parties' intention to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than litigation. Under Finnish law, an arbitration agreement can be valid even if it is part of a broader contract.
Arbitrator Appointment:
The parties are free to agree on the number and selection of arbitrators. If the parties cannot reach an agreement, the Finnish Central Chamber of Commerce (Keskuskauppakamari) can step in to assist in the appointment. Typically, there are one or three arbitrators, though the parties may agree on a different number.
Arbitration Procedure:
The Arbitration Act allows the parties considerable freedom to set the procedural rules governing their arbitration, provided the process is fair and transparent. If the parties cannot agree, the arbitral tribunal has the authority to set the procedural rules, as long as the principles of equality and due process are respected.
Interim Measures:
Finnish courts can issue interim measures in support of arbitration proceedings. For instance, courts can issue injunctions or orders to preserve evidence or assets. Additionally, the tribunal itself can grant interim relief if the parties agree to this.
Confidentiality:
Arbitration proceedings in Finland are typically confidential, meaning that the details of the dispute and the award are not made public unless the parties agree otherwise or if the enforcement of the award requires public disclosure.
3. Judicial Intervention
While Finland’s legal system encourages minimal judicial intervention in the arbitration process, the courts can intervene in certain situations:
Compelling Arbitration:
If a party refuses to arbitrate despite an agreement to do so, the other party may apply to the courts to compel arbitration.
Setting Aside an Award:
The courts can set aside an arbitral award under specific circumstances. Grounds for setting aside an award include:
- The arbitration agreement was not valid.
- The party was not given an opportunity to present its case.
- The arbitral tribunal exceeded its authority.
- The award was made in violation of Finnish public policy.
Appeals:
Finnish law does not allow appeals on the merits of an arbitral award. However, there are limited grounds for challenging an award on procedural grounds, such as if there was a serious irregularity in the proceedings.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards:
Arbitral awards rendered in Finland are directly enforceable in Finnish courts. Once an award is made, the winning party can apply to the court for enforcement. The court will enforce the award unless there are grounds to set it aside under Finnish law.
Foreign Awards:
As a signatory to the New York Convention, Finland recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards. Foreign awards are generally enforceable in Finland, subject to a few exceptions. These exceptions include cases where the award violates public policy or was made in a jurisdiction that does not adhere to the principles of the New York Convention.
5. Arbitration Institutions in Finland
While arbitration can be conducted ad hoc (without an institutional framework), there are several institutions in Finland that provide administrative services for arbitration. Some key institutions include:
Finnish Arbitration Institute (FAI):
The Finnish Arbitration Institute (FAI), established by the Helsinki Region Chamber of Commerce, is one of the main institutions in Finland for domestic and international arbitration. The FAI provides a set of arbitration rules and assists with the appointment of arbitrators. It is one of the most prominent institutions for conducting arbitration in Finland and supports the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Helsinki Region Chamber of Commerce:
The Helsinki Region Chamber of Commerce plays an important role in the arbitration landscape in Finland, providing services such as the administration of arbitral proceedings and the appointment of arbitrators. It is also responsible for overseeing the operations of the Finnish Arbitration Institute.
International Institutions:
Finnish parties may also opt for international arbitration institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), or the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC). These institutions offer widely recognized arbitration rules and procedures, and their awards are enforceable internationally.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in Finland
Modern Legal Framework:
Finland’s Arbitration Act is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, aligning it with international standards and providing a predictable, efficient, and transparent arbitration process.
Enforceability of Foreign Awards:
As a signatory to the New York Convention, Finland ensures the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards, making it an attractive venue for international dispute resolution.
Efficiency:
Arbitration in Finland is often faster and more flexible than litigation. The ability for parties to design their own procedures and select their arbitrators contributes to a more streamlined dispute resolution process.
Neutral and Independent Legal Environment:
Finland is known for its stable legal and political environment, which makes it an ideal jurisdiction for arbitration, especially for international parties seeking a neutral forum.
7. Challenges of Arbitration in Finland
Limited Local Infrastructure:
While Finland offers robust legal and institutional support, there may be a limited number of arbitration specialists compared to major arbitration hubs like London or Paris. This could present challenges for parties requiring specific expertise.
Geographic Location:
The geographical location of Finland, although in the heart of Europe, may present challenges for international parties in terms of logistics and travel costs.
Costs:
Depending on the complexity and length of the arbitration, costs can be relatively high. However, this is often offset by the efficiency and expertise offered by Finnish arbitration institutions.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Finland is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996, which is based on international best practices, including the UNCITRAL Model Law. Finland provides a flexible and modern legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration, ensuring fairness, transparency, and the enforceability of awards. Finland’s adherence to the New York Convention adds to its attractiveness as an arbitration venue, and its well-established institutions, such as the Finnish Arbitration Institute, offer additional support for arbitration proceedings. Despite a few logistical challenges, Finland remains a strong choice for arbitration, especially for parties looking for a neutral, efficient, and internationally recognized forum for dispute resolution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments