Arbitration Law in Slovakia
Arbitration Law in Slovakia is governed primarily by the Arbitration Act (Act No. 244/2002 Coll.), which regulates arbitration procedures in the country. Slovakia has also adopted provisions in line with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Below is a comprehensive overview of Arbitration Law in Slovakia:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Act (Act No. 244/2002 Coll.): The primary legislation governing arbitration in Slovakia is the Arbitration Act. It covers both domestic and international arbitration and sets out the procedural rules for arbitration, the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of hearings, and the enforcement of awards.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: Slovakia has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), which is incorporated into its legal system. This ensures that Slovakia follows internationally recognized standards for resolving commercial disputes through arbitration.
- New York Convention: Slovakia is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which means that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable in Slovakia, provided they meet the conditions set out in the Convention.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: For arbitration to be valid in Slovakia, there must be a written agreement between the parties to submit their dispute to arbitration. The agreement can be a clause within a contract or a separate agreement.
- Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are generally enforceable in Slovakia. However, if the agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, such as due to lack of consent or procedural issues, the court may intervene.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators. Typically, the tribunal consists of one or three arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree, a single arbitrator is usually appointed, unless the nature of the dispute warrants a larger panel.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: Arbitrators can be appointed by the parties. If the parties are unable to agree on the appointment, the court may intervene and appoint the arbitrators. In the case of a three-member tribunal, the court may appoint the presiding arbitrator.
- Independence and Impartiality: Arbitrators in Slovakia must be independent and impartial. Any potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed before their appointment.
- Qualifications: There are no specific qualifications set out in the Arbitration Act, but arbitrators are expected to have expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: Slovakia upholds the principle of party autonomy in arbitration. This means that the parties are free to agree on the procedures to be followed, including whether to use institutional rules (e.g., ICC, LCIA) or ad hoc rules. In the absence of an agreement, the Arbitration Act provides a procedural framework.
- Default Procedure: If the parties do not agree on the arbitration procedures, the Arbitration Act provides default rules on the conduct of arbitration, such as the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of hearings, and the issuance of awards.
- Language: The parties are free to determine the language of the arbitration. If they fail to agree, the tribunal will decide on the language to be used.
- Place of Arbitration: The seat of arbitration (which determines the jurisdiction) is typically chosen by the parties. If no agreement is made, the tribunal will decide on the place of arbitration.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Binding Nature: Arbitral awards in Slovakia are final and binding on the parties. If a party refuses to comply with the award, the prevailing party can apply to the court for enforcement.
- Form of Award: The award must be in writing, signed by the arbitrators, and should include the reasoning behind the decision unless the parties have waived this requirement.
- Types of Relief: The tribunal can grant various forms of relief, such as monetary damages, specific performance, or injunctive relief, depending on the nature of the dispute.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards made within Slovakia are enforceable through the Slovak courts. The courts will recognize and enforce awards made within the jurisdiction.
- Foreign Awards: Slovakia, as a party to the New York Convention, recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards. However, foreign awards can only be enforced in Slovakia if they meet the requirements of the Convention. Grounds for refusal include:
- The arbitration agreement was not valid under the law of the country in which the award was made.
- The party against whom the award was made was not properly notified or given an opportunity to present their case.
- The award is contrary to public policy in Slovakia.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Review: Slovak courts have a limited role in reviewing arbitral awards. Courts cannot reexamine the merits of the dispute but can set aside an award under specific conditions:
- The arbitration agreement was invalid.
- The tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
- There was a serious procedural irregularity (e.g., denial of due process).
- The award is contrary to public policy in Slovakia.
- Setting Aside Procedure: A party seeking to set aside an award must apply to the court within three months from the date the award is received.
8. Institutional vs. Ad Hoc Arbitration
- Institutional Arbitration: Slovakia allows for institutional arbitration, and parties can choose to resolve their disputes under the rules of recognized arbitration institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC), or the Slovak Arbitration Court (SAC).
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: Parties may also opt for ad hoc arbitration, where they establish their own rules and conduct the arbitration independently. If the parties do not specify the rules, the Arbitration Act provides a default procedural framework.
9. International Arbitration
- International Commercial Arbitration: Slovakia is a member of the European Union and has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention for international commercial arbitration. As such, Slovakia provides a favorable environment for resolving international disputes through arbitration.
- Foreign Arbitrations in Slovakia: Slovakia’s adherence to international treaties ensures that foreign arbitration awards are recognized and enforceable in the country, making it a reliable jurisdiction for cross-border dispute resolution.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Arbitration Reforms: Slovakia has periodically reformed its arbitration laws to ensure they remain in line with international standards. The legal framework for arbitration is continually evolving, particularly in areas such as the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards and increasing the efficiency of the arbitral process.
- Promoting Arbitration: Slovakia actively promotes arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, particularly in the context of international commercial disputes. The country’s arbitration law aligns with the best practices of international arbitration.
Conclusion
Arbitration Law in Slovakia is primarily governed by the Arbitration Act (Act No. 244/2002 Coll.), which provides a comprehensive legal framework for both domestic and international arbitration. Slovakia’s adherence to the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention ensures that it follows internationally recognized standards for arbitration, making it an attractive jurisdiction for resolving commercial disputes. The focus on party autonomy, impartiality, and the enforceability of awards makes Slovakia a reliable venue for arbitration in Central Europe.
RELATED Blog
0 comments