Arbitration Law in French Polynesia (France)
Arbitration Law in French Polynesia (France)
French Polynesia is an overseas collectivity of France, and as such, it follows the same legal framework for arbitration as mainland France. Arbitration in French Polynesia is primarily governed by the French Code of Civil Procedure (Code de procédure civile), which applies uniformly across France, including its overseas territories like French Polynesia.
The arbitration legal system in French Polynesia mirrors the national French system, which is influenced by international standards, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958).
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in French Polynesia
As part of France, French Polynesia is subject to the same laws governing arbitration as mainland France. Arbitration is governed by the French Code of Civil Procedure under Articles 1442 to 1527. This legal framework provides a clear and structured approach to both domestic and international arbitration.
The provisions governing arbitration in French Polynesia align with the French approach to arbitration, which is heavily influenced by party autonomy and international conventions like the New York Convention.
2. Key Features of Arbitration Law in French Polynesia
Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement in French Polynesia must be in writing. It can be a part of a larger contract or a separate agreement. The agreement should explicitly state the parties' intention to resolve disputes through arbitration. The arbitration agreement must be respected unless deemed invalid due to specific legal reasons.
Similar to the rest of France, French Polynesia enforces the freedom of choice for parties, allowing them to choose:
- The arbitration institution (e.g., ICC or CMAP)
- The number of arbitrators (usually one or three)
- The seat of arbitration
- The language and the procedural rules
Disputes related to the validity of the arbitration agreement can be referred to the French courts, including in French Polynesia.
Arbitrators
The French Code of Civil Procedure allows the parties to freely select the arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree on an appointment, a French court (including in French Polynesia) can intervene and appoint arbitrators. Arbitrators must be impartial and independent and have the necessary expertise relevant to the subject matter of the dispute.
The typical number of arbitrators is one or three, but the parties are free to decide based on the nature of the dispute.
Arbitration Procedure
The arbitration procedure is designed to be flexible and party-driven:
- The parties can agree on the rules of procedure, and the arbitral tribunal can establish rules in the absence of party agreement.
- The French Code of Civil Procedure ensures that the procedure remains fair and impartial, with an emphasis on respecting due process and the equality of the parties.
- The place of arbitration (seat) can be agreed upon by the parties, whether it is in French Polynesia or elsewhere.
- Interim Measures: Arbitrators in French Polynesia, like those in France, have the power to order interim measures to preserve the parties’ rights during the arbitration process.
Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in French Polynesia, as in France, are generally confidential. This is especially crucial in commercial arbitration, where sensitive business information is at stake. Both the arbitration hearings and the arbitral award are typically not disclosed to the public unless the parties agree to do so.
3. Judicial Intervention
French courts, including those in French Polynesia, generally take a hands-off approach to arbitration, emphasizing minimal intervention. However, there are instances where the courts may intervene:
Compelling Arbitration: If one party refuses to arbitrate, the other party can apply to the court to compel the other party to engage in arbitration, as long as there is a valid arbitration agreement in place.
Setting Aside an Award: A French court (including in French Polynesia) may set aside an arbitral award if:
- The arbitration agreement is invalid.
- There was a serious procedural violation, such as a lack of due process.
- The award is in conflict with French public policy.
Appeals: There is generally no appeal on the merits of an arbitral award. However, the party may apply to the court for annulment on limited grounds such as violation of procedural fairness or public policy.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards:
Arbitral awards made in French Polynesia are directly enforceable within the jurisdiction of French Polynesia and mainland France. If a party seeks enforcement, they can apply to the court for exequatur (recognition and enforcement).
Foreign Awards:
As a signatory to the New York Convention, France (and French Polynesia) recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards. Foreign awards will be enforced unless they are in violation of French public policy.
5. Arbitration Institutions in French Polynesia
While French Polynesia does not have a dedicated arbitration institution, it shares access to the same arbitration institutions available in mainland France. Some key institutions are:
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC):
The ICC, headquartered in Paris, is one of the most widely recognized institutions for international arbitration and is available for use in French Polynesia.
Centre de Médiation et d'Arbitrage de Paris (CMAP):
CMAP offers administrative and procedural support for arbitration, including for international and domestic disputes.
French Chamber of Commerce:
While not an arbitration institution per se, the French Chamber of Commerce offers services to facilitate the arbitration process in French Polynesia, including assistance in the selection of arbitrators and arbitration rules.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in French Polynesia
Pro-Arbitration Environment:
French Polynesia benefits from France’s strong legal framework supporting arbitration. The country provides a favorable and supportive environment for resolving disputes through arbitration.
International Recognition:
French Polynesia, through France’s membership in the New York Convention, allows for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, providing a globally recognized dispute resolution mechanism.
Flexibility and Party Autonomy:
Parties to arbitration in French Polynesia have the freedom to choose the arbitration rules, the number of arbitrators, and the language of proceedings, creating a flexible environment for resolving disputes.
7. Challenges of Arbitration in French Polynesia
Limited Local Arbitration Infrastructure:
French Polynesia does not have as extensive a network of arbitration professionals and institutions as mainland France. However, parties can access the same institutions based in Paris and other parts of France.
Geographic Considerations:
French Polynesia's geographical location in the Pacific Ocean can present logistical challenges, such as travel costs or time zone issues, for parties and arbitrators from abroad.
Costs:
Arbitration can be expensive, particularly in high-stakes international disputes, due to the costs associated with arbitration institutions, expert witnesses, and legal fees.
Conclusion
Arbitration in French Polynesia follows the legal principles and procedures established in France's Code of Civil Procedure, which is aligned with international arbitration practices. Arbitration is supported as an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes in French Polynesia, benefiting from party autonomy, minimal judicial intervention, and strong enforcement mechanisms both domestically and internationally. Despite some challenges related to local infrastructure and geography, French Polynesia offers a favorable legal environment for arbitration, particularly for commercial disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments