Arbitration Law in Sudan
Arbitration law in Sudan is primarily governed by Law No. 25 of 1993 on Arbitration. This legislation lays the foundation for both domestic and international arbitration in the country. It is designed to facilitate dispute resolution through arbitration, in line with international practices. Sudan is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which allows for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
Here’s an overview of Arbitration Law in Sudan:
1. Legal Framework
- Law No. 25 of 1993 on Arbitration: This is the main legislation governing arbitration in Sudan. It regulates both domestic and international arbitration and aims to provide an efficient, fair, and reliable method for resolving disputes outside the court system.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: While Sudan's arbitration law does not follow the UNCITRAL Model Law word for word, the law incorporates many elements from international arbitration practices. It supports the idea of party autonomy and the recognition of arbitral awards in Sudan.
- New York Convention: Sudan ratified the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which obligates Sudan to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards made in countries that are also parties to the Convention.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: An arbitration agreement must be in writing to be enforceable. It can either be a separate agreement or an arbitration clause within a larger contract. The agreement should be clear about the parties' intention to resolve disputes through arbitration.
- Enforceability: If there is a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement, Sudanese courts will generally uphold the agreement and refer disputes to arbitration, provided the agreement is not deemed invalid for reasons such as fraud, coercion, or lack of consent.
- Scope of the Arbitration Agreement: The arbitration agreement should specify the scope of disputes to be resolved. If the parties have a valid agreement, the courts will generally stay litigation proceedings and refer the matter to arbitration.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The number of arbitrators is typically agreed upon by the parties. Usually, one or three arbitrators are appointed, depending on the complexity of the dispute. If the parties cannot agree on the number, the law allows the court or arbitration institution to decide.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties have the freedom to appoint arbitrators based on their qualifications. If they cannot agree on the arbitrators, the court or the arbitration institution may intervene and make the appointment.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators in Sudan must be impartial and independent. They are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and parties can challenge an arbitrator if there are grounds to believe that they lack impartiality.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: The principle of party autonomy is recognized under Sudanese arbitration law, meaning that the parties are free to agree on the rules, procedures, and venue for their arbitration. This includes choosing institutional or ad hoc arbitration and selecting the arbitration rules (e.g., UNCITRAL or ICC Rules).
- Institutional Arbitration: Sudan has arbitration institutions that can administer disputes. One notable institution is the Sudan Arbitration Center, which handles both domestic and international disputes and provides a framework for the arbitration process, including the appointment of arbitrators.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: If the parties choose ad hoc arbitration, they may agree to use established arbitration rules such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or any other rules they prefer. The parties have the freedom to design the procedural aspects of the arbitration.
- Language of Arbitration: The parties to the arbitration are free to determine the language of the proceedings, although Arabic and English are commonly used in Sudan.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Final and Binding: An arbitral award is generally final and binding on the parties. The award must be complied with unless the parties successfully challenge it in court within the limited grounds provided by the law.
- Form of Award: The award must be written and signed by the arbitrators. It must include the reasons for the decision unless the parties agree otherwise. If a party does not comply with the award, the other party may apply to the court for enforcement.
- Types of Remedies: Arbitrators have the authority to issue a range of remedies, including monetary damages, injunctive relief, and specific performance depending on the nature of the dispute and the relief sought by the parties.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards in Sudan are enforceable through the court system. If the losing party refuses to comply with the award, the prevailing party can file a request for enforcement in the courts.
- Foreign Awards: Sudan is a signatory to the New York Convention and is obligated to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards from other signatory countries, subject to the conditions set out in the Convention.
- Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement: The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards can be refused on limited grounds such as:
- The award was made in a country that is not a party to the New York Convention.
- The award violates Sudanese public policy.
- The party against whom the award is invoked was not given adequate notice of the proceedings.
- The award deals with a dispute that was not subject to the arbitration agreement.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Grounds for Challenge: The grounds for challenging an arbitral award in Sudan are narrow and closely follow international norms. A party may seek to set aside an award on the following limited grounds:
- Excess of Jurisdiction: The arbitrators exceeded their jurisdiction or powers under the arbitration agreement.
- Serious Procedural Defects: There was a serious procedural irregularity, such as failure to provide an opportunity to be heard or improper conduct during the proceedings.
- Fraud or Corruption: If the award was obtained through fraud, bribery, or corruption.
- Public Policy Violation: If the award is contrary to Sudan’s public policy or fundamental legal principles.
- Time Limit for Challenges: A party must file an application to set aside the award within three months from the date of receiving the award. After this period, the award becomes final and binding.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: Sudanese courts play a supportive role in the arbitration process. They assist in appointing arbitrators if the parties fail to agree, and they may grant interim measures to protect the arbitration process (such as asset freezing orders).
- Stay of Court Proceedings: If a party initiates litigation in court despite an existing arbitration agreement, the court will typically stay the litigation and refer the case to arbitration, unless the arbitration agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable.
- Enforcement of Awards: Courts are responsible for enforcing both domestic and foreign arbitral awards, as per the provisions of the New York Convention.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Sudan
- Sudan Arbitration Center (SAC): The Sudan Arbitration Center is a leading institution in Sudan that handles both domestic and international arbitration. It provides administrative support for arbitration proceedings and offers a range of services, including arbitrator appointment, case management, and assistance in enforcing awards.
- Other Institutions: Other institutions such as commercial chambers and trade organizations may also provide arbitration services in specific sectors.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Promotion of Arbitration: Sudan is working to promote arbitration as a preferred method of dispute resolution, particularly in commercial and international disputes. There have been efforts to improve awareness of arbitration and to create a more supportive environment for dispute resolution.
- Legal Reforms: While Sudan’s arbitration law is based on international standards, there is room for further reform to enhance the country’s attractiveness as an arbitration hub. Improvements may include streamlining enforcement procedures, enhancing institutional support, and updating the legal framework to keep up with international best practices.
- Growth of International Arbitration: Sudan’s growing role in international trade and investment means that the need for arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism will likely continue to grow. As Sudan integrates further into the global economy, its arbitration laws will likely evolve to reflect international norms.
Conclusion
Arbitration Law in Sudan, governed by Law No. 25 of 1993, provides a solid framework for resolving both domestic and international disputes. The law incorporates key international principles such as party autonomy and adherence to UNCITRAL Model Law standards. Sudan's commitment to the New York Convention ensures the enforceability of foreign awards, enhancing its credibility as a venue for international arbitration. Although there are ongoing efforts to improve and streamline the arbitration process, Sudan offers a relatively favorable environment for arbitration, with established institutions like the Sudan Arbitration Center supporting the dispute resolution process.
RELATED Blog
0 comments