Arbitration Law in San Marino
San Marino has a modern and well-established legal framework for arbitration, which encourages the use of arbitration for the resolution of both domestic and international disputes. The country's legal system is rooted in the civil law tradition, and its arbitration laws are designed to promote an efficient, fair, and neutral environment for dispute resolution.
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Law (Law No. 36/2001): The primary legislation governing arbitration in San Marino is Law No. 36/2001, which regulates arbitration and dispute resolution. This law aligns with international standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, which is widely used as a reference for modern arbitration statutes.
- New York Convention: San Marino is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This means that foreign arbitral awards made in countries that are also signatories to the Convention can be recognized and enforced in San Marino, subject to limited exceptions.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: An arbitration agreement must be in writing to be valid under Law No. 36/2001. This can be in the form of an arbitration clause within a contract or a separate agreement to arbitrate.
- Scope of Agreement: The agreement should clearly define the types of disputes that the parties agree to submit to arbitration. It is important for the parties to expressly agree to arbitrate rather than to litigate their dispute in a court of law.
- Arbitration Clause: If included in a contract, the arbitration clause should specify the rules and procedures governing the arbitration and the location of the arbitration (i.e., the seat of arbitration).
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The number of arbitrators is generally agreed upon by the parties, but it is typical to have either one or three arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree, the court can assist in appointing arbitrators.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: If the parties cannot mutually agree on the appointment of arbitrators, Law No. 36/2001 allows the court to intervene and appoint the arbitrators.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators must be impartial and independent. They are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting their appointment.
- Qualifications of Arbitrators: While there are no specific qualifications prescribed in Law No. 36/2001, arbitrators should ideally have expertise in the subject matter of the dispute and be knowledgeable about the arbitration process.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Flexibility: The Arbitration Law allows great flexibility in the conduct of arbitration proceedings. The parties are free to agree on the procedural rules governing the arbitration.
- Institutional Arbitration: If the parties agree to institutional arbitration, the rules of the chosen institution (e.g., ICC, LCIA, CIArb) will govern the procedure. Institutional arbitration offers a structured framework for resolving disputes.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: In ad hoc arbitration, the parties are free to agree on the rules of procedure, although Law No. 36/2001 provides default rules, such as the requirement for the equal treatment of parties and the right of each party to present its case.
- Location of Arbitration: The parties are free to agree on the seat (location) of the arbitration. Arbitration may take place in San Marino or in another jurisdiction agreed upon by the parties.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Binding Nature: An arbitral award is final and binding on the parties once rendered. There is no right to appeal the substance of the award, although the award may be subject to judicial review on limited grounds.
- Form of Award: The arbitral award must be in writing and signed by the arbitrator(s). The award should include the reasoning behind the decision unless the parties agree to an award without reasons.
- Relief: The arbitral tribunal has the authority to grant a variety of remedies, including monetary compensation, specific performance, and other forms of relief appropriate to the dispute.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Arbitral Awards: Arbitral awards made in San Marino are enforceable in the local courts. If a party refuses to comply with the award, the prevailing party can apply to the Sammarinese courts for enforcement, and the courts will generally recognize and enforce the award as if it were a court judgment.
- Foreign Arbitral Awards: As San Marino is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards made in other countries that are signatories to the Convention can be enforced in San Marino. However, enforcement may be refused on specific grounds, such as if the award violates public policy or if the arbitration agreement was deemed invalid.
- Grounds for Refusal: The courts in San Marino may refuse to enforce a foreign arbitral award on the following grounds:
- Invalid Arbitration Agreement: If the arbitration agreement is not valid or enforceable under the law of the country where the arbitration took place.
- Due Process Violations: If the party seeking enforcement was not given proper notice of the arbitration or the proceedings were otherwise unfair.
- Public Policy: If enforcing the award would be contrary to public policy in San Marino.
- Excess of Jurisdiction: If the arbitrators exceeded their authority as defined by the arbitration agreement.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- The Sammarinese courts allow for the setting aside of an arbitral award, but the grounds are limited. An award may be set aside if:
- The tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the dispute.
- There were serious violations of due process, such as the lack of proper notice or an opportunity to present one’s case.
- The award is contrary to public policy.
- The judicial review is narrow, meaning the courts will not re-examine the merits of the dispute but will focus on whether the arbitration procedure followed was in compliance with fundamental principles of fairness and legality.
8. Institutional vs. Ad Hoc Arbitration
- Institutional Arbitration: San Marino's legal framework provides for institutional arbitration if the parties choose an arbitration institution (e.g., ICC, LCIA, CIArb). In this case, the institution’s rules will govern the arbitration, and the institution will assist with appointing arbitrators and managing the process.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: In ad hoc arbitration, the parties have the flexibility to agree on the rules and procedures, with Law No. 36/2001 offering default provisions to ensure fairness and efficiency in the process. Ad hoc arbitration does not involve the assistance of an institution, which can make the process more flexible but requires more involvement from the parties.
9. International Arbitration
- San Marino is a member of the New York Convention, making it a favorable jurisdiction for international commercial arbitration. It also aligns its laws with the UNCITRAL Model Law, offering a modern, internationally accepted legal framework for resolving cross-border disputes.
- Given its small size and the use of Sammarinese law in disputes involving local companies or entities, San Marino is a neutral and efficient forum for international arbitration in Europe.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- San Marino continues to uphold a pro-arbitration stance and has modernized its legal system to promote arbitration as an effective means of dispute resolution. The country’s legal infrastructure supports both domestic and international arbitration, with a commitment to international conventions such as the New York Convention.
- As international arbitration continues to grow in popularity, San Marino's legal system is likely to evolve in order to remain aligned with global trends in dispute resolution.
Conclusion
San Marino’s Arbitration Law (Law No. 36/2001) provides a modern and flexible framework for arbitration, drawing on the UNCITRAL Model Law and aligned with international best practices. The country’s commitment to the New York Convention ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable. The system allows both institutional and ad hoc arbitration, offering an efficient and neutral forum for resolving domestic and international disputes. With its favorable arbitration laws, San Marino is well-positioned as a jurisdiction of choice for those seeking alternative dispute resolution in Europe.
RELATED Blog
0 comments