Arbitration Law in Somalia
The Arbitration Law in Somalia is still in a developing phase, as the country has faced significant political and legal challenges over the years. However, there are some efforts to provide a legal framework for arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to improve the legal environment for both domestic and international disputes.
Key Features of Arbitration Law in Somalia:
1. Legal Framework
- Lack of a Formal Arbitration Act: Somalia does not yet have a comprehensive Arbitration Act like many other countries. However, arbitration and dispute resolution are often governed by traditional practices, commercial law, and certain provisions from Islamic law (Sharia).
- Adherence to International Standards: There have been discussions about aligning Somalia's arbitration framework with international standards, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention, but this has not yet been fully realized in the country.
- Somali Civil Code: The Somali Civil Code, introduced in 1975, contains certain provisions that govern arbitration, but these are relatively limited and not very detailed. For instance, it provides for the resolution of disputes through amicable settlement or arbitration in commercial and contractual matters.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: Like most jurisdictions, an arbitration agreement in Somalia is generally required to be in writing for it to be enforceable. This may take the form of a separate agreement or an arbitration clause in a commercial contract.
- Public Policy and Enforcement: While the Somali legal system may support the enforcement of arbitration agreements, traditional practices and public policy may sometimes influence the enforceability of arbitration agreements in certain circumstances.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number and Appointment of Arbitrators: The Somali legal framework does not set specific rules on the number or appointment of arbitrators, leaving the parties to agree on the procedure. Typically, arbitration tribunals consist of one or three arbitrators. If the parties do not agree on the number or appointment, a court or institution may intervene.
- Qualifications of Arbitrators: Somalia does not have specific requirements for the qualifications of arbitrators, although it is generally expected that arbitrators be qualified and competent in the subject matter of the dispute. In practice, the local expertise of arbitrators may be preferred for resolving domestic disputes, while international arbitrators may be appointed for cross-border matters.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: Somalia generally respects the principle of party autonomy, meaning that the parties are free to choose the procedural rules and methods for resolving disputes. In practice, parties often choose ad hoc arbitration or arbitration conducted by a regional or international institution, particularly for international commercial disputes.
- Traditional Dispute Resolution: Many Somali people still prefer using traditional dispute resolution methods, such as Xeer (customary law), which can include mediation and arbitration based on customary practices. These traditional methods are sometimes used in parallel with more formal arbitration procedures.
- Islamic Law Influence: Sharia law also influences dispute resolution in Somalia, especially in family law and contractual matters. Arbitration conducted under Islamic law is commonly used to resolve commercial or family disputes, though it is not formally recognized by a modern arbitration act.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Enforceability: The enforceability of arbitral awards in Somalia is not as straightforward as in countries with a more developed legal system. Somali law, in general, lacks a well-established framework for the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards. However, the Islamic law and customary law approaches can sometimes lead to the voluntary enforcement of arbitral awards.
- Traditional Enforcement: In many cases, arbitral awards that arise from traditional or Islamic arbitration are enforced voluntarily by the parties based on the social and community pressures associated with Somali customary practices.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
- Limited Enforcement Mechanisms: Somalia's ability to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards is limited due to the absence of a formal international legal framework. Somalia is not currently a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which limits the country's ability to enforce international arbitration awards.
- Regional Enforcement: In practice, regional enforcement may occur through cooperation with neighboring countries, but this is more informal and less structured compared to international standards.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Oversight: Since the legal framework surrounding arbitration in Somalia is still under development, there is limited judicial oversight of arbitral awards. Somali courts may intervene in cases of fraud, violation of public policy, or other serious procedural issues. However, there are no comprehensive provisions for setting aside an arbitral award as seen in jurisdictions with a fully developed arbitration framework.
- Role of Traditional Leaders and Elders: In addition to legal courts, traditional leaders or elders play an important role in resolving disputes and may have some authority to intervene in disputes that arise in the arbitration process, especially for domestic cases.
8. International Arbitration and Somalia's Future Outlook
- Interest in International Arbitration: Somalia has not yet fully developed a system for international arbitration, but there is growing interest in using arbitration for resolving international disputes, especially in sectors such as trade, oil and gas, and construction.
- Regional Arbitration Agreements: Somalia may look to enter into regional arbitration agreements or align with international conventions in the future to improve the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards, which could make it a more attractive jurisdiction for international businesses.
- Legal Reforms: There have been discussions about modernizing the Somali legal system, including reforms related to dispute resolution and arbitration, to help align the country’s laws with international standards and attract foreign investment. However, these reforms have not yet been implemented on a large scale.
9. Challenges in Arbitration
- Political Instability: Political instability and security concerns in Somalia have hindered the development of a comprehensive and reliable legal framework for arbitration. This instability also affects the functioning of legal institutions, which can complicate the enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards.
- Lack of Infrastructure: There is limited institutional infrastructure to support arbitration in Somalia. The absence of dedicated arbitration centers and trained arbitrators poses challenges for both domestic and international arbitration.
- Reliance on Customary and Islamic Law: Many Somali people continue to rely on customary law and Sharia law to resolve disputes. While these systems may be effective locally, they do not have the same level of international recognition or formality as commercial arbitration.
Conclusion
Arbitration law in Somalia is still in a nascent stage, with limited formal legal infrastructure and an increasing reliance on traditional and Islamic dispute resolution methods. While the Arbitration Act and the principles of Sharia and customary law play a role in dispute resolution, the country has not yet developed a comprehensive, modern framework for arbitration. Efforts to align the legal system with international standards, such as joining the New York Convention, would be essential for making Somalia a more attractive location for international arbitration in the future. However, significant challenges related to political instability, legal infrastructure, and enforcement remain.
RELATED Blog
0 comments