Arbitration Law in Poland

In Poland, arbitration is governed by the Polish Arbitration Law (Act of 5 July 2002 on Arbitration Proceedings), which implements key international arbitration standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law. Poland is a member of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Arbitration in Poland is a popular mechanism for resolving both domestic and international disputes, particularly in commercial, civil, and investment matters.

Key Features of Arbitration in Poland:

Arbitration Act of 2002 (Amended in 2019):

  • The Polish Arbitration Law provides a clear framework for arbitration proceedings, including rules for the initiation of arbitration, the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of proceedings, and the enforcement of awards.
  • The law reflects international best practices and the UNCITRAL Model Law, aiming to promote Poland as a business-friendly arbitration destination.

Arbitration Agreements:

  • Arbitration agreements are enforceable under Polish law. Parties can agree to resolve disputes through arbitration either by including an arbitration clause in a contract or by signing an arbitration agreement after the dispute arises.
  • Polish courts will generally respect and enforce arbitration agreements, referring parties to arbitration even if one party tries to bring the case before a court.
  • If an arbitration agreement is disputed or challenged, the court may review its validity, but it will typically uphold valid arbitration clauses unless they are deemed unenforceable (e.g., if the agreement is contrary to public policy or involves a matter not arbitrable under Polish law).

Arbitration Procedure:

  • The arbitration procedure in Poland is primarily governed by the agreement between the parties or the rules of the chosen arbitration institution. If the parties do not specify rules, the Polish Arbitration Act provides default rules.
  • Arbitration can be institutional or ad-hoc:
    • Institutional Arbitration: Administered by an arbitration institution (e.g., the Polish Chamber of Commerce (Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza), Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce (Sąd Arbitrażowy przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej), or Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC)), where the institution provides structured rules and administrative support.
    • Ad-hoc Arbitration: Where parties agree on the procedure themselves or adopt rules like those of the UNCITRAL or ICC (International Chamber of Commerce).
  • Choice of Arbitrators: The parties have the freedom to select the number of arbitrators (typically one or three) and their qualifications. In institutional arbitration, institutions often provide lists of qualified arbitrators.
  • If the parties fail to agree on the appointment of arbitrators, the court can intervene to appoint an arbitrator.

Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards:

  • Domestic Arbitration: Arbitral awards rendered within Poland are generally binding and enforceable. A party can request the Polish courts to recognize and enforce an arbitral award if the other party refuses to comply.
  • International Arbitration: Poland is a signatory to the New York Convention, so foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable in Poland, subject to the conditions specified in the Convention (e.g., the award must not violate Polish public policy).
  • Setting Aside an Award: A party can challenge an arbitral award before the Polish courts. However, the grounds for setting aside an award are limited, including issues such as violations of due process, lack of jurisdiction, or the award being contrary to public policy.

Role of the Courts:

  • Supportive Role: Polish courts generally play a supportive role in arbitration, ensuring the enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards and assisting in procedural matters, such as appointing arbitrators or issuing interim measures (e.g., injunctions).
  • Limited Intervention: Courts may intervene in limited circumstances, such as when a party challenges the validity of an arbitration agreement or an arbitral award. The courts can annul or refuse to enforce an award on very specific grounds (e.g., violation of public policy).
  • Courts can also grant interim measures, although arbitration itself often handles procedural matters like securing evidence or the preservation of assets.

Public Policy Exception:

  • As with many jurisdictions, Poland maintains a public policy exception for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. An arbitral award may not be recognized or enforced if it violates Polish public policy, such as awards that contravene Polish laws or moral principles.
  • This exception is narrowly interpreted and applies only in cases where the award is fundamentally incompatible with the core values of Polish law.

Confidentiality:

  • Arbitration proceedings in Poland are generally private and confidential, unless the parties agree otherwise. This confidentiality extends to the hearings and the contents of the award, which is one of the reasons why arbitration is often preferred for commercial disputes.

Advantages of Arbitration in Poland:

  • Efficient and Cost-Effective: Arbitration is generally seen as a faster and less expensive method for resolving disputes compared to litigation in Polish courts.
  • International Recognition: Being a signatory of the New York Convention, Poland offers a reliable environment for enforcing foreign arbitral awards.
  • Flexibility: Parties can agree on their own procedures, choose their arbitrators, and select the venue of arbitration, making the process more flexible and tailored to their needs.
  • Legal Framework: The Polish Arbitration Act is closely aligned with international standards, ensuring that the arbitration process adheres to globally recognized practices.

Recent Developments:

  • Poland continues to modernize its arbitration framework to make the country more attractive for both domestic and international arbitration. There have been efforts to improve the efficiency of the arbitration process, enhance the qualifications of arbitrators, and strengthen the role of Polish arbitration institutions in the global market.

Summary:

Arbitration in Poland is governed by the Polish Arbitration Act of 2002, which aligns with international arbitration standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law. Arbitration is an efficient, flexible, and cost-effective method for resolving commercial disputes, with both domestic and international arbitration being widely used. Poland offers strong legal protections for arbitration agreements and the enforcement of arbitral awards, particularly due to its commitment to the New York Convention. Arbitration is seen as a favorable alternative to litigation, especially for international businesses and investors operating in Poland.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments