Arbitration Law in Suriname
Arbitration Law in Suriname is governed by a combination of domestic legal provisions and international treaties, aimed at promoting arbitration as a means of dispute resolution. Suriname has made significant progress in aligning its arbitration framework with international standards.
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Law of 1982: Suriname’s primary legal framework for arbitration is the Arbitration Law of 1982. This law governs both domestic and international arbitration and outlines the procedures for resolving disputes outside the court system.
- International Treaties: Suriname is a signatory to key international conventions, such as the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which enables the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Suriname. This aligns Suriname with international arbitration practices.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: While the Arbitration Law of 1982 does not directly follow the UNCITRAL Model Law, it is largely in harmony with international arbitration principles, especially those related to party autonomy, independence of arbitrators, and the enforcement of awards.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: Similar to most countries, arbitration agreements in Suriname must be written. This could be an independent agreement or an arbitration clause within a broader contract.
- Scope: The arbitration agreement should clearly define the disputes that will be submitted to arbitration. If there is a valid arbitration agreement, courts in Suriname will generally refer the dispute to arbitration instead of handling it through litigation.
- Enforceability: Suriname’s courts are likely to uphold arbitration agreements, provided the agreement is valid and the arbitration clause does not contravene public policy or the parties' rights.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The number of arbitrators is usually determined by the parties, and typically, one or three arbitrators are appointed. The parties may decide the number based on the complexity of the dispute.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The appointment process is flexible. If the parties do not agree on the selection of arbitrators, the court or arbitration institution may intervene. The law ensures that the arbitrators are impartial and independent.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators in Suriname must be independent and impartial. Parties can challenge an arbitrator if they believe there is a conflict of interest or bias.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: Suriname upholds the principle of party autonomy, which means the parties are free to determine the rules and procedures for the arbitration process. They can decide on the location, language, and procedural rules (e.g., UNCITRAL or ICC Rules).
- Institutional Arbitration: Although there is no single dominant arbitration institution in Suriname, international institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) may be chosen to administer arbitration proceedings.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: If parties prefer ad hoc arbitration, they can agree on procedural rules such as UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or any other mutually agreed-upon framework.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Final and Binding: Arbitral awards in Suriname are generally final and binding on the parties. They can be enforced through Suriname's court system.
- Types of Awards: Arbitrators can issue a variety of remedies, including monetary damages, specific performance, or injunctive relief, depending on the nature of the dispute.
- Written Award: The award must be written and signed by the arbitrators, and it must state the reasoning behind the decision unless the parties agree otherwise.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards in Suriname are enforceable through the national courts. If a party does not comply with an award, the prevailing party may request enforcement.
- Foreign Awards: Suriname is a party to the New York Convention, which means it recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards made in other countries that are signatories to the Convention.
- Grounds for Refusal: Suriname courts may refuse the enforcement of an arbitral award on limited grounds, including if:
- The award violates Suriname’s public policy.
- The party against whom the award is being enforced did not have sufficient notice of the arbitration proceedings.
- The award was made in a country that is not a party to the New York Convention.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Grounds for Setting Aside: Suriname allows the setting aside of an arbitral award on limited grounds. This could include:
- Excess of Jurisdiction: If the arbitrators exceeded their authority or jurisdiction.
- Serious Procedural Irregularities: If there were significant procedural errors, such as failure to give a party a fair hearing.
- Public Policy Violations: If the award is inconsistent with Suriname’s public policy.
- Time Limits: The application to set aside an award must generally be filed within a specific timeframe after the party has been notified of the award. This time limit is typically three months.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: Suriname’s courts generally play a supportive role in arbitration. This includes appointing arbitrators if the parties fail to agree, granting interim measures to protect the arbitration process, and ensuring the enforcement of arbitral awards.
- Stay of Court Proceedings: If a dispute is subject to a valid arbitration agreement, Suriname’s courts will typically stay litigation proceedings and refer the case to arbitration.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Suriname
- There is no dominant, established domestic arbitration institution in Suriname. However, parties often resort to international arbitration institutions, such as the ICC or PCA, to administer their arbitration proceedings.
- Some commercial associations in Suriname may also facilitate arbitration or offer guidelines for resolving business disputes.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Promotion of Arbitration: Suriname is working to improve its legal framework for arbitration to increase its attractiveness as a destination for international dispute resolution. This includes increasing awareness of arbitration and its benefits, particularly for the business and investment sectors.
- Reform of Arbitration Law: Suriname is continuously looking to modernize its arbitration laws and improve the efficiency and fairness of the arbitration process. There may be future reforms to align the country’s arbitration laws more closely with international best practices and to streamline enforcement procedures.
Conclusion
The Arbitration Law in Suriname is designed to support the resolution of disputes through arbitration, both domestically and internationally. With Law No. 23 of 1982 as the core legal framework, Suriname allows significant party autonomy in choosing the arbitration rules and institutions. Suriname’s ratification of the New York Convention ensures that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced, promoting its role as an emerging arbitration hub in the region. Though Suriname has some room for improvement in developing its domestic arbitration infrastructure, the country remains committed to enhancing its arbitration framework for future growth and investment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments