Arbitration Law in South Korea
South Korea has a well-established and sophisticated Arbitration Law, which supports both domestic and international arbitration. The country has been a member of key international conventions and has developed a legal framework that promotes arbitration as an effective alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism. Below is an overview of the key features of Arbitration Law in South Korea:
Key Features of Arbitration Law in South Korea:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Act, 1966 (as amended): South Korea’s Arbitration Act is the primary law governing arbitration in the country. It was originally enacted in 1966 and has undergone several amendments to align with international standards. The Act governs both domestic and international arbitration.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: South Korea's Arbitration Act closely follows the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), which standardizes international arbitration practices. The alignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law is part of South Korea's efforts to ensure its arbitration system is internationally recognized and respected.
- New York Convention (1958): South Korea is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This means that foreign arbitral awards made in countries that are also signatories to the Convention can be enforced in South Korea, subject to specific conditions such as not violating public policy.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: For an arbitration agreement to be enforceable, it must be in writing. This can be a standalone agreement or an arbitration clause within a larger contract. South Korean law adheres to the principle that a written agreement to arbitrate is necessary for the arbitration process to proceed.
- Scope of the Agreement: The arbitration agreement must clearly define the scope of the disputes that are to be submitted to arbitration. In case of ambiguity, the courts may interpret the agreement to determine whether the dispute falls under the arbitration clause.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the number and method of appointing arbitrators. Typically, the tribunal consists of one or three arbitrators, depending on the complexity of the case and the parties' agreement. If the parties cannot agree on the appointment, the court may intervene and appoint the arbitrators.
- Qualification of Arbitrators: Arbitrators are expected to be qualified and impartial. South Korean law allows parties to select arbitrators based on their qualifications, including expertise in the subject matter of the dispute. However, the law does not set specific criteria for the professional qualifications of arbitrators.
- Independence and Impartiality: South Korean law requires arbitrators to be independent and impartial. Any potential conflict of interest must be disclosed by the arbitrator, and the parties have the right to challenge the appointment if there are concerns about impartiality.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: South Korea's arbitration law strongly supports party autonomy, meaning the parties are free to agree on the procedures and rules for arbitration, including choosing whether to follow institutional arbitration (such as the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB)) or ad hoc arbitration.
- Institutional Arbitration: The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) is the primary institution administering arbitration in South Korea. The KCAB provides comprehensive rules for the conduct of arbitrations and facilitates the appointment of arbitrators. It also provides administrative support for arbitration proceedings.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: Parties may choose to conduct ad hoc arbitration in accordance with agreed-upon rules, such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, or other institutional rules if both parties agree.
- Arbitration Rules: If the parties do not agree on the procedural rules, the Arbitration Act provides a default procedure for conducting the arbitration, including how hearings are to be held, the timeline for proceedings, and the presentation of evidence.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Final and Binding: Arbitral awards issued in South Korea are final and binding on the parties. There is a very limited scope for judicial review of arbitral awards. In general, courts do not reexamine the merits of the case unless there are significant procedural irregularities.
- Types of Relief: Arbitrators in South Korea have the authority to grant a wide range of remedies, including monetary damages, injunctive relief, and specific performance, depending on the nature of the dispute.
- Form of Award: An arbitral award must be written, signed by the arbitrators, and provide reasons for the decision unless the parties agree to a non-reasoned award. The award must be made within the time frame agreed upon by the parties or set by the tribunal.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards in South Korea are enforceable without the need for further court intervention, unless a party applies to the court to set aside the award. The courts will only set aside an award on limited grounds, such as fraud, excess of jurisdiction, or violation of public policy.
- Foreign Awards: South Korea is a signatory to the New York Convention, which allows for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards made in other countries that are also parties to the Convention. Foreign awards are enforceable unless they violate South Korea's public policy or do not meet the requirements set out in the Convention.
- Enforcement Procedures: To enforce a foreign arbitral award in South Korea, the party seeking enforcement must submit the award and the original arbitration agreement (or a certified copy) to the court. The court will review whether the award complies with the conditions set forth in the New York Convention and South Korean law.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Grounds for Review: South Korean courts have very limited grounds to review or set aside an arbitral award. These grounds are typically related to:
- Fraud or corruption in the arbitration process.
- Excess of jurisdiction by the arbitral tribunal.
- Serious procedural irregularities, such as a party not being given proper notice or an opportunity to present their case.
- The award is contrary to public policy in South Korea.
- Time Limits for Challenges: The time frame for challenging an award is generally 30 days from the date of receiving the award. After this period, challenges are rarely entertained.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: South Korean courts have a supportive role in the arbitration process. They can assist in appointing arbitrators, granting interim relief (such as injunctions), and enforcing arbitral awards. Courts generally respect the autonomy of the arbitration process and do not interfere unless necessary.
- Interim Measures: Courts in South Korea can provide interim measures in support of arbitration, including ordering temporary injunctions or the preservation of evidence. The court can also assist in the enforcement of interim measures ordered by an arbitral tribunal, particularly if they are likely to be violated before the award is rendered.
- Refusal to Stay Proceedings: If a party initiates legal proceedings in court despite an existing arbitration agreement, the court will typically grant a stay of those proceedings to allow the arbitration to proceed, unless the court finds the arbitration agreement to be invalid.
9. Arbitration Institutions in South Korea
- Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB): The KCAB is the main institution for administering arbitration in South Korea. It provides both domestic and international arbitration services and has its own set of arbitration rules. KCAB handles a wide range of disputes, including commercial, construction, and intellectual property disputes.
- KCAB International: The KCAB International division focuses on international arbitration and offers procedures for arbitrations governed by international laws, including the UNCITRAL Model Law.
- Arbitration Support: KCAB provides administrative support, appoints arbitrators, and manages the procedural aspects of arbitration, making it one of the leading arbitration institutions in the region.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Promotion of South Korea as an Arbitration Hub: South Korea is positioning itself as a leading arbitration hub in Asia. The country has made significant efforts to improve its arbitration infrastructure, strengthen the independence of arbitrators, and align with international standards to attract foreign investment and international disputes.
- Digital Arbitration: South Korea is also exploring the use of technology in arbitration, including online dispute resolution (ODR), especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, to make arbitration more efficient and accessible.
Conclusion
South Korea has a modern, comprehensive, and internationally recognized framework for arbitration. The Arbitration Act, the UNCITRAL Model Law, and the country's adherence to the New York Convention provide a solid legal foundation for both domestic and international arbitration. The supportive role of the courts, the availability of arbitration institutions like the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), and South Korea's commitment to party autonomy make it an attractive jurisdiction for resolving disputes. With ongoing efforts to strengthen its position as a global arbitration hub, South Korea is well-equipped to handle the arbitration needs of both domestic and international businesses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments