Tort law at Uganda
Tort law in Uganda is based on the common law legal tradition, largely inherited from English law during the colonial period. Over time, Uganda has developed its own case law and statutes, but the principles remain grounded in English common law, with tort law playing a key role in offering remedies for civil wrongs committed against individuals or their property.
📘 Legal Framework for Tort Law in Uganda
Common Law & Doctrines of Equity:
Under Section 14(2)(b) of the Judicature Act (Cap. 13), Ugandan courts apply common law and the doctrines of equity, as modified by Ugandan statutes and circumstances.
Key Sources of Tort Law:
English common law principles of tort (e.g. Donoghue v. Stevenson)
Ugandan statutes (e.g. Traffic and Road Safety Act)
Judicial precedents from Ugandan courts
Constitution of Uganda, 1995 (especially regarding rights and compensation)
⚖️ Core Principles of Tort Law in Uganda
To establish tort liability in Uganda, a claimant must usually prove:
A wrongful act or omission by the defendant
Injury or damage to the claimant
A causal link between the act/omission and the injury
Fault (negligence or intent) — except in cases of strict liability
🛠️ Main Types of Torts Recognized in Uganda
1. Negligence
Defined as failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in damage.
Requires proving:
Duty of care
Breach of that duty
Causation
Damages
Example case: Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] (applied in Uganda)
2. Defamation
Divided into libel (written) and slander (spoken).
The claimant must prove:
False and defamatory statement
Reference to the claimant
Publication to a third party
Defenses include truth, privilege, and fair comment.
3. Trespass to Land and Person
Trespass to land: Unlawful entry onto another’s property.
Trespass to person: Includes assault, battery, and false imprisonment.
Example: Police misconduct cases often fall under this tort.
4. Nuisance
Unlawful interference with the use or enjoyment of land.
May be public (affecting the community) or private (affecting an individual).
5. Strict Liability
Applied in certain cases (e.g. Rylands v. Fletcher), where someone is held liable for hazardous activities even without fault.
May apply in environmental and industrial damage.
6. Economic Torts
Include passing off, inducing breach of contract, and malicious falsehood, though these are less frequently litigated in Uganda.
💰 Remedies in Tort Cases
Damages
General damages: for pain and suffering, emotional distress.
Special damages: quantifiable financial loss (e.g. medical bills, lost income).
Aggravated/exemplary damages: awarded in cases of particularly egregious conduct.
Injunctions
Court orders restraining the defendant from continuing the wrongful act (common in trespass or nuisance cases).
Declaration
A court statement affirming rights, often used in defamation or land disputes.
📌 Key Ugandan Tort Law Cases
Kyambadde v. Mpigi District Administration [1983]: Court held the defendant liable for negligence after a motor vehicle accident.
Attorney General v. Sekabira [1990]: Dealt with false imprisonment and awarded damages for violation of personal liberty.
Charles Harry Twagira v. AG [2008]: Defamation and malicious prosecution — plaintiff awarded significant damages.
🌍 Recent Developments
The 1995 Constitution of Uganda recognizes the right to compensation for violations of fundamental rights, expanding the scope of constitutional torts (e.g. unlawful arrest, detention, or torture by state agents).
There is increasing recognition of environmental torts, especially under Uganda’s National Environment Act.
✅ Conclusion
Tort law in Uganda is rooted in English common law but continues to evolve through judicial decisions, legislation, and constitutional principles. It provides legal remedies for civil wrongs such as negligence, defamation, trespass, and nuisance, and plays an important role in upholding personal rights and property interests.
RELATED Blog
0 comments