Malicious Prosecution under Law of Torts
Malicious Prosecution under Law of Torts
1. Introduction
Malicious prosecution is a tort recognized in common law systems that protects individuals from wrongful and malicious legal actions initiated against them without reasonable cause. It allows a person who has been subjected to a baseless prosecution or lawsuit to claim damages against the person who initiated it.
In essence, malicious prosecution occurs when someone institutes or continues legal proceedings against another person without reasonable grounds and with malice, resulting in damage to the latter.
2. Essentials/Elements of Malicious Prosecution
For a successful claim of malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove the following key elements:
a) Initiation or Continuation of Legal Proceedings
The defendant must have initiated or continued a criminal or civil proceeding against the plaintiff.
The proceeding can be a criminal prosecution or a civil lawsuit.
b) Termination of Proceedings in Favor of Plaintiff
The previous legal proceeding must have ended in favor of the plaintiff (the accused in the original case).
Termination must be on merits or in a manner indicating the plaintiff's innocence.
If the case ended due to settlement, compromise, or withdrawal, malicious prosecution claim usually does not lie.
c) Absence of Reasonable and Probable Cause
The defendant must have no reasonable or probable cause to start or continue the legal proceedings.
“Reasonable cause” means an honest belief in the guilt of the accused, based on reasonable grounds.
d) Malice or Improper Purpose
The legal action must have been initiated with malice, that is, with an improper motive other than bringing a genuine offender to justice.
Malice can be inferred from lack of reasonable cause but must be established as an element.
e) Damages
The plaintiff must have suffered damage or injury as a result of the wrongful prosecution.
Damage can be in the form of loss of reputation, financial loss, mental agony, or physical suffering.
3. Rationale Behind the Tort
To protect individuals from abuse of the legal process.
To ensure that people do not face unwarranted harassment through false accusations.
To provide compensation to victims of malicious legal actions.
To deter the misuse of legal remedies for personal vendettas.
4. Distinction from Related Torts
Defamation: Malicious prosecution protects from wrongful legal proceedings; defamation protects from false statements harming reputation.
Wrongful Arrest/False Imprisonment: These relate to unlawful detention, while malicious prosecution relates to wrongful initiation of legal proceedings.
5. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: M.C. Chockalingam v. Emperor, AIR 1939 PC 71
The Privy Council clarified the importance of absence of reasonable cause and malice as essential elements.
It emphasized that mere failure to prove a charge does not automatically amount to malicious prosecution.
Case 2: S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath, AIR 1994 SC 853
The Supreme Court of India reiterated the principle that malicious prosecution requires malice and lack of reasonable cause.
Also highlighted that the termination of proceedings must be in favor of the accused.
Case 3: Thomas v. Winchester, 6 N.Y. 397 (1852) (Common law principle often cited)
Established the idea that wrongful legal action taken without reasonable cause and with malice can result in liability for damages.
6. Application in Criminal vs Civil Proceedings
Traditionally, malicious prosecution referred mainly to criminal prosecutions.
Many jurisdictions, including India, have expanded the tort to civil proceedings as well.
In India, both wrongful criminal prosecutions and baseless civil suits can attract malicious prosecution claims if essentials are satisfied.
7. Defenses Against Malicious Prosecution
Reasonable and probable cause: If the defendant can prove a bona fide belief in the guilt or claim.
Lack of malice: Even if the case fails, if no improper motive is proven, the claim fails.
Settlement or withdrawal: If proceedings ended without judgment, no claim usually lies.
Absolute or qualified privilege: In some cases, like statutory or judicial acts, immunity may apply.
8. Damages and Remedies
The plaintiff may claim compensatory damages for loss of reputation, mental distress, costs incurred during the prosecution, and sometimes punitive damages.
Injunctive relief is generally not available in malicious prosecution.
9. Conclusion
Malicious prosecution as a tort plays a vital role in the legal system by balancing the right to initiate legal proceedings with protection against abuse of process. It requires clear proof of malice, lack of reasonable cause, favorable termination, and resulting damage.
This tort discourages reckless or spiteful use of the legal system and safeguards the integrity of judicial processes while protecting individuals’ rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments