Tort law at Cape Verde
1. Traffic Accident Caused by Negligent Driving
Scenario
A pedestrian, walking in the crosswalk in Praia, is struck by a car driven by an individual who was texting while driving. The driver failed to notice the pedestrian, resulting in the pedestrian suffering broken bones and severe bruising.
Legal Issues
Negligence: The driver’s failure to pay attention while driving is a classic example of negligence. The law requires drivers to maintain reasonable care while operating their vehicles, and texting while driving breaches this duty.
Duty of Care: Drivers owe pedestrians a duty of care to avoid causing harm. When this duty is breached (as it was in this case), the injured party is entitled to compensation.
Causation: The pedestrian’s injuries directly resulted from the driver’s negligent action.
Likely Legal Outcome
The driver would likely be found liable for negligence. The pedestrian can claim compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If the driver was found to be grossly negligent (e.g., if they were speeding in addition to texting), this could increase the damages.
2. Medical Malpractice in a Public Hospital
Scenario
A patient at a public hospital in São Vicente is misdiagnosed by a doctor who failed to properly review the patient's medical history. As a result, the patient is prescribed the wrong medication, which worsens their condition.
Legal Issues
Professional Duty of Care: Doctors and healthcare providers owe a heightened duty of care to their patients, which includes acting with competence and diligence.
Breach of Duty: The doctor’s failure to review the patient’s medical records before diagnosing and prescribing medication constitutes a breach of this duty.
Damages: The patient suffers worsened health, increased medical bills, and pain due to the doctor's mistake.
Likely Legal Outcome
The hospital and the doctor would likely be held vicariously liable for the negligence of the healthcare provider, as they are responsible for the actions of their employees under Cape Verde’s Civil Code.
The patient could receive compensation for medical malpractice, including future medical care, lost wages, and emotional distress. However, if the hospital is a public entity, there may be additional steps for the patient to claim against the state, which could complicate the process.
3. Defamation by a Local Journalist
Scenario
A local journalist in Mindelo publishes an article in a prominent newspaper, accusing a local business owner of being involved in illegal activities, without any proof. The business owner suffers reputational harm, and his sales decline as a result.
Legal Issues
Defamation: The journalist’s publication of false information without verification could be considered defamatory, which is an offense under Cape Verde's defamation laws. The business owner’s reputation has been harmed because of the false accusation.
Freedom of Speech vs. Reputation: While Cape Verde recognizes freedom of speech, it is limited by the protection of individual reputation. In this case, the journalist's false reporting breaches this principle.
Actual Damages: The business owner can claim compensation for both the economic loss (decline in sales) and non-economic damages (emotional distress).
Likely Legal Outcome
The journalist and newspaper publisher could be held liable for defamation. The business owner may receive compensation for economic and reputational damages.
The damages could be increased if the court finds that the journalist acted with malice or recklessness.
4. Slip and Fall Incident in a Grocery Store
Scenario
A customer at a supermarket in Sal slips and falls on a wet floor that was not properly marked with a caution sign. The customer breaks an arm and incurs medical expenses and lost wages.
Legal Issues
Premises Liability: Under tort law, property owners and businesses have a duty to maintain safe premises for their customers. This includes addressing hazards such as wet floors and placing warning signs.
Negligence: The supermarket failed to place a warning sign or clean the spill in a timely manner, constituting negligence.
Causation: The customer’s injury directly resulted from the supermarket’s failure to address the hazard.
Likely Legal Outcome
The supermarket would likely be held liable for negligence due to their failure to maintain a safe environment.
The injured customer could claim compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If the supermarket has insurance, it might cover the damages.
5. Animal Attack by a Neighbor’s Dog
Scenario
A person in Boa Vista is bitten by a neighbor’s dog while walking near the neighbor’s property. The dog had a history of aggressive behavior, and the neighbor had failed to properly secure the dog within their yard.
Legal Issues
Strict Liability for Animals: Under Cape Verde’s Civil Code, animal owners can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their animals if the animal is not properly controlled.
Failure to Secure the Animal: The neighbor failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent the dog from attacking, which is a breach of their duty to ensure their animal does not pose a threat to others.
Damages: The victim may have incurred medical costs and may experience pain, suffering, and emotional distress from the attack.
Likely Legal Outcome
The neighbor would likely be held strictly liable for the dog’s attack, regardless of whether they were negligent.
The victim can claim compensation for medical expenses, psychological harm, and any lost income due to the injury.
6. Property Damage Caused by Construction Work
Scenario
A construction company working on a new building project in Praia accidentally causes damage to a neighboring building by miscalculating the depth of a foundation and causing a small landslide that cracks the neighboring walls.
Legal Issues
Negligence: The construction company might be found negligent for failing to properly assess the risks associated with their work, which led to the damage.
Property Damage: The neighboring property owner has the right to seek compensation for the damage to their property, which was directly caused by the construction company's actions.
Causation: The property owner’s damages (e.g., repair costs) were directly caused by the construction company's mistake.
Likely Legal Outcome
The construction company would likely be held liable for negligence. The property owner can seek compensation for the cost of repairs, potential loss in property value, and any other consequential damages.
7. Environmental Damage from Oil Spill
Scenario
An oil tanker docks at the Port of Praia, and due to a fault in its loading mechanism, it spills oil into the water, causing environmental damage to the coastline and harming local marine life.
Legal Issues
Environmental Liability: The company operating the tanker would be held liable under both Cape Verde’s civil law and international environmental treaties to which Cape Verde is a party. The company has a duty to ensure its operations do not harm the environment.
Strict Liability: Given the nature of the activity (transporting and loading oil), the company may face strict liability for the environmental harm caused.
Damages: The government and local residents could claim compensation for the environmental cleanup costs and lost income from the fishing industry.
Likely Legal Outcome
The oil company would be held strictly liable for the damage. They may be ordered to pay for the cleanup and compensate those whose livelihoods were affected (e.g., fishermen).
Conclusion
Cape Verde's tort law provides a solid framework for addressing various types of wrongs, from negligence to strict liability. These case studies demonstrate how liability can be assigned based on the breach of duty and causation, and how damages can be awarded to compensate victims for harm suffered. Given the principles of Cape Verde’s civil code, tort law is used to ensure justice is served in cases of personal injury, defamation, property damage, and more.
RELATED Blog
comments