Difference Between Crime and Tort
Difference Between Crime and Tort
| Aspect | Crime | Tort |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Crime is an act or omission prohibited by law and punishable by the state. | Tort is a civil wrong where one person's wrongful act causes harm or loss to another, leading to civil liability. |
| Purpose | To maintain public order and punish the offender. | To compensate the injured party for the harm suffered. |
| Parties Involved | The state (prosecution) vs. the accused (defendant). | The injured party (plaintiff) vs. the wrongdoer (defendant). |
| Nature of Wrong | An offense against society as a whole. | A private wrong against an individual or entity. |
| Punishment | Punishment can include imprisonment, fines, or death. | Remedies are usually in the form of damages (monetary compensation) or injunctions. |
| Standard of Proof | Beyond reasonable doubt (very high standard). | Preponderance of evidence (balance of probabilities). |
| Example | Theft, murder, assault. | Negligence, defamation, trespass. |
Explanation:
Crime:
Crime is considered an offense against the whole society or the state. When a crime is committed, it disrupts public order and safety. Therefore, the government takes responsibility for prosecuting the offender. The aim is to punish the wrongdoer and deter others.
Tort:
Tort, on the other hand, is a civil wrong. It occurs when one person causes harm or injury to another, intentionally or by negligence. The main aim in tort law is to provide relief to the injured party, mostly through compensation.
Case Law Examples
Case for Crime:
R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884)
Facts: Two sailors, stranded at sea, killed and ate a cabin boy to survive.
Held: They were found guilty of murder. This was a crime against society, and despite their survival situation, the law punished the act as criminal.
This case highlights that crime deals with offenses punishable by the state for violating public law.
Case for Tort:
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932)
Facts: Mrs. Donoghue drank a ginger beer that contained a decomposed snail, which caused her illness.
Held: The manufacturer owed a duty of care to the consumer, and negligence led to harm.
Outcome: She was entitled to compensation.
This is a landmark case in tort law demonstrating how a person wronged by another’s negligence can claim damages.
Summary:
Crime involves punishment by the state for acts against society.
Tort involves compensation or remedy for harm caused to an individual.
The state prosecutes crimes, while individuals sue in tort.
The burden of proof in crime is higher than in tort.
RELATED Blog
0 comments