Tort law at Tunisia
Tort law in Tunisia is primarily governed by civil law principles, rooted in French civil law and Islamic legal traditions. Tunisia operates under a codified legal system, with tort liability regulated by the Tunisian Code of Obligations and Contracts (COC)—the equivalent of a civil code—which sets out the legal framework for civil liability, including wrongful acts and compensation.
Key Features of Tort Law in Tunisia
1. Legal Framework
Tunisia’s legal system is a civil law system, influenced heavily by French law due to its colonial past.
The Code of Obligations and Contracts (COC), enacted in 1906 and amended over time, is the main source of tort law. Tort liability is mainly addressed in Articles 82 to 107.
Islamic legal concepts have also historically influenced Tunisian law, especially regarding moral responsibility and harm.
2. General Principles of Tort Liability
Under Tunisian law, a person may be held liable in tort (called responsabilité délictuelle) if they commit a wrongful act that causes harm to another.
The three key elements are:
A wrongful act (fait dommageable): Can be intentional or negligent.
Causation: There must be a direct causal link between the wrongful act and the damage.
Damage (dommage): The victim must prove actual harm—either material, physical, or moral.
3. Fault-Based Liability
Fault (faute) is central to most tort claims. It can take the form of:
Negligence: Carelessness or failure to act prudently.
Intentional acts: Deliberate actions that cause harm.
The standard of care is assessed against what a “reasonable person” would have done in similar circumstances.
4. Strict Liability
In some cases, strict liability applies. For instance:
Parents are liable for damage caused by their minor children.
Employers may be liable for torts committed by employees in the course of their duties.
Owners of animals or buildings may be liable for damages caused by them, regardless of fault.
5. Types of Recognized Torts
Common torts under Tunisian law include:
Personal injury: Harm to body or health (e.g., from accidents).
Property damage: Destruction or loss of goods.
Moral damage: Psychological or reputational harm; this is compensable under Tunisian law.
Defamation and insult (diffamation et injure): Can result in both civil and criminal liability.
Environmental damage: Increasingly addressed by environmental protection laws and can fall under general tort principles.
6. Damages and Compensation
Compensatory damages are awarded for actual losses:
Material damage: Medical expenses, lost income, and repair costs.
Moral (non-material) damage: Emotional distress, pain and suffering, loss of dignity or reputation.
Punitive damages are not recognized under Tunisian law, in line with civil law traditions.
The goal is to restore the victim, as closely as possible, to their original condition before the injury (restitutio in integrum).
7. Liability of Public Authorities
The State of Tunisia and its public servants can be held liable for wrongful acts committed during official duties.
There is a distinction between acts of sovereignty (non-reviewable) and acts of administration (subject to judicial control).
Claims against public authorities are handled by administrative courts.
8. Statute of Limitations
Tort claims are generally subject to a 15-year limitation period, unless otherwise specified by law (Article 402 COC).
In some cases (e.g., involving minors or hidden damage), the period may be tolled or extended.
9. Procedural Aspects
Tort claims are heard in civil courts for private matters and administrative courts for public authority liability.
The plaintiff must prove fault, damage, and causation.
Expert reports and witness testimony often play a major role.
Summary
Tort law in Tunisia is codified and grounded in civil law, primarily through the Code of Obligations and Contracts. It operates on a fault-based system, with exceptions for strict liability in certain cases. Recognized torts include personal injury, property damage, moral harm, and defamation. Compensation aims to make the victim whole, and there is no concept of punitive damages. The state can be held liable for harm caused by public servants, with such cases reviewed in specialized administrative courts.
RELATED Blog
0 comments