Judgment Reviews Law at South Africa
In South Africa, judicial review is a fundamental mechanism that ensures government actions comply with the Constitution, upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights. The country's legal framework for judicial review is primarily governed by the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA) and is underpinned by constitutional principles such as the principle of legality, rationality, and procedural fairness.
⚖️ Constitutional and Legal Basis
The Constitution of South Africa enshrines the right to just administrative action, which is further detailed in PAJA. PAJA allows individuals to seek judicial review of administrative decisions that are unlawful, unreasonable, or procedurally unfair. This framework ensures that public authorities act within their legal bounds and respect citizens' rights.
🧾 Grounds for Judicial Review
Under PAJA, courts may review administrative actions on several grounds:
Illegality: The decision-maker acted beyond their powers or failed to comply with statutory requirements
Irrationality: The decision is not logically connected to the information available or is so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have made it
Procedural Unfairness: The affected party was not given a fair opportunity to present their case or was not informed of the decision-making process
Bias or Conflict of Interest: The decision-maker had a personal interest in the outcome or was biased These grounds ensure that administrative decisions are made lawfully and fairly, providing a check on executive power
⏳ Procedural Requirements
Before seeking judicial review, applicants must comply with certain procedural requirements
Exhaustion of Internal Remedies: Applicants must first utilize any internal remedies available within the administrative system before approaching the courts
Time Limits: Applications for judicial review must generally be made within 180 days from the date the applicant became aware of the administrative action or could reasonably have been expected to become aware These procedural safeguards ensure that judicial review is used appropriately and not as a means to delay administrative processes
🏛️ Role of the Courts
South Africa's courts play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of powers and ensuring that administrative actions are lawful. In cases like Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly (2018), the Constitutional Court emphasized the need to respect the principle of popular sovereignty and cautioned against judicial overreach that could undermine the separation of power. Similarly, in Glenister v President (2008), the Court held that judicial intervention in pending legislation is not appropriate except in exceptional cases where immediate intervention is required to prevent material and irreversible harm.
🔍 Recent Developments
*Jacob Zuma Contempt Case: In 2021, the Constitutional Court sentenced former President Jacob Zuma to 15 months in prison for contempt of court after he failed to appear before a commission investigating corruption during his presidency This ruling reinforced the principle that no one is above the law, demonstrating the judiciary's independence and commitment to upholding the Constitution.
*State Immunity Case: In a recent case, the Supreme Court ruled in Favor of the Government of South Africa, granting state immunity in a salvage dispute involving state-owned carol The Court's decision highlighted the importance of interpreting state immunity laws in line with international conventions and parliamentary intent.
📌 Summary
*Legal Framework: PAJA and constitutional principles guide judicial review in South Africa.
*Grounds for Review: Include illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness, and bas.
*Procedural Requirements: Applicants must exhaust internal remedies and adhere to time limits.
*Judicial Role: Courts ensure administrative actions comply with the Constitution and maintain the separation of powers.
South Africa's judicial review system serves as a vital safeguard against unlawful administrative actions, ensuring that government decisions are made within the bounds of the law and respect citizens' rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments