Judgment Reviews Law at Malta
Malta's judicial review framework is a vital component of its legal system, enabling individuals to challenge administrative decisions that may be unlawful, unreasonable, or procedurally improper. Rooted in both statutory law and common law principles, the system has evolved to provide accessible and effective remedies for aggrieved parties.
⚖️ Legal Foundations and Framework
Judicial review in Malta is primarily governed by:
Article 469A of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (COCP): Allows the courts to review the legality of
Administrative Justice Act (Chapter 490): Established the Administrative Review Tribunal in 2009, providing an alternative forum for reviewing administrative acts. The Tribunal is empowered to assess the legality of administrative decisions and is composed of a Chairperson and two assistants, with sittings held in both Malta and Gozo
🏛️ Court Structure and Jurisdiction
Malta's judicial review process involves multiple levels of courts and tribunals
First Hall of the Civil Court: Handles applications for judicial review under Article 469A COCP parties must typically exhaust ordinary remedies before seeking judicial review
Administrative Review Tribunal: Provides an alternative avenue for challenging administrative acts, focusing on the legality of decisions made by public authorities
Court of Appeal:Hears appeals from decisions of the First Hall of the Civil Court and the Administrative Review Tribunal
Constitutional Court:Addresses constitutional issues, including the interpretation of the Constitution and the validity of laws
📝 Grounds for Judicial Review
Judicial review in Malta can be sought on various grounds, includin:
Illegality When an administrative act exceeds the powers granted by la.
Irrationality When a decision is unreasonable or disproportionat.
Procedural Impropriety When there is a failure to follow proper procedures or to act fairl.
Abuse of Discretion When discretion is exercised for improper purposes or in bad fait For example, in the case of Joseph Gheiti u Sansone Cruises Limited v. L-Awtorita’ għat-Trasport f’Malta, the First Hall of the Civil Court emphasized that parties must first utilize available ordinary remedies before seeking judicial review
⚠️ Limitations and Exceptions
Certain administrative decisions are exempt from judicial revie:
Discretionary Decisions Decisions such as the granting or citizenship are considered discretionary and are not subject to judicial review
Government Litigation Privilege In some cases, the government may claim litigation privilege, limiting the disclosure of certain documents in judicial review proceedings Additionally, the Administrative Review Tribunal has a limited scope, focusing on specific administrative acts prescribed by law
🧭 Recent Developments and Reform
Malta continues to evolve its judicial review landscae:
**Judicial Review (Decisions not to Prosecute and Other Decisions of the Prosecution) Act (Act No. XLI of 2020)*: Introduced reforms to provide for the judicial review of decisions not to prosecute and other decisions of the Attorney General, enhancing transparency and accountability in prosecutorial decisions
*Proposed Reforms: In 2023, a draft proposal regarding judicial review was presented to the Speaker of the House, marking the first time in Maltese parliamentary history that a draft law was prepared by students in collaboration with the Nationalist Party
🧾 Conclusin
Malta's judicial review system provides a robust mechanism for individuals to challenge administrative decisions that may be unlawful or unjs. With a combination of court procedures and specialized tribunals, the system aims to ensure fairness and accountability in administrative actin. Ongoing reforms and proposals indicate a commitment to further enhancing the accessibility and effectiveness of judicial review in Mata.
RELATED Blog
0 comments