Judgment Reviews Law at Mongolia
Judicial Review in Mongolia: Legal Framework and Institutional Dynamics
Mongolia's judicial review system has undergone significant developments since the early 2000s, reflecting the country's commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability in administrative actions.
⚖️ Legal Foundations and Institutional Framework
Mongolia's judicial review framework is primarily governed by the General Administrative Law and the Law on Administrative Court Procedure, both enacted in 2015 and effective from July 2016. These laws empower administrative courts to review the legality of administrative acts, including those issued by the Cabinet. The administrative courts operate under the oversight of the Supreme Court of Mongolia, which has a dedicated Administrative Chamber for such cases.
The Constitutional Court of Mongolia (Tsets) retains the authority to assess the constitutionality of laws and decisions made by the State Great Khural, the President, the Government, and international treaties. However, the Tsets does not have jurisdiction over the legality of administrative acts, a distinction that has led to tensions with the Supreme Court regarding the scope of judicial review.
🏛️ Court Structure and Jurisdiction
Mongolia's court system comprises
Supreme Court The highest judicial authority, overseeing all cases, including administrative disputes
Administrative Courts: Established in 2004, these courts handle disputes arising from administrative acts Initially, their jurisdiction was limited due to constitutional interpretations by the Tsets However, following legal reforms in 2015, their authority to review administrative decisions, including those by the Cabinet, was reinstated
Constitutional Court (Tsets): Reviews the constitutionality of laws and decisions but does not engage in judicial review of administrative acts
📝 Grounds for Judicial Review
judicial review in Mongolia can be sought on the following ground:
Illegality When an administrative act exceeds the powers granted by la.
Irrationality When a decision is unreasonable or disproportionat.
Procedural Impropriety When there is a failure to follow proper procedures or to act fairl.
Abuse of Discretion When discretion is exercised for improper purposes or in bad fait. These principles align with international standards of administrative justice and are applied by the administrative courts in Mongoli.
⚠️ Challenges and Institutional Tensions
Despite legal provisions, the implementation of judicial review faces challenge:
Institutional Tensions The Tsets has historically limited the jurisdiction of administrative courts, particularly concerning the review of Cabinet decision. This stance has led to conflicts with the Supreme Court, which asserts the authority of administrative courts to review such decision
Resource Constraints Limited resources may affect the capacity of courts and agencies to handle judicial review cases efficientl.
Access to Legal Representation Individuals may face challenges in accessing legal counsel, which can impede their ability to initiate judicial review proceeding.
Awareness of Rights There may be a lack of awareness among the public regarding their rights to challenge administrative decisions, limiting the use of judicial revie
🧭 Conclusio
Mongolia's judicial review system has evolved to provide mechanisms for challenging administrative decisions, reflecting a commitment to the rule of lw While legal frameworks have been established, ongoing efforts are needed to address institutional tensions and practical challenges to ensure the effective exercise of judicial review in Mongola.
RELATED Blog
0 comments