Judgment Reviews Law at Australia
In Australia, judicial review serves as a critical mechanism to ensure that government decisions comply with the law and uphold individual rights. This process allows courts to assess whether administrative actions are lawful, fair, and reasonable.
⚖️ Key Legal Frameworks
1. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)
This federal legislation provides a structured process for challenging most administrative decisions made by Australian Government ministers, departments, and agencies. Under this Act, applicants can seek review on several grounds, including:
Breach of natural justice
Procedural errors
Lack of jurisdiction
Improper exercise of power
Error of law
Fraudulent influence
Absence of evidence
Decisions contrary to law
The Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court has the authority to review such decisions, and remedies may include quashing the decision, remitting the matter for reconsideration, or issuing declaratory relief
2. Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)
Established on 14 October 2024, the ART replaced the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It conducts independent merits reviews of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws. While not a court, the ART's decisions are subject to judicial review by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court
3. State and Territory Judicial Review
Each Australian state and territory has its own legislative framework for judicial review. For instance, the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1989 in the Australian Capital Territory outlines grounds for review similar to the federal Act citeturn0search2. However, state supreme courts generally do not have jurisdiction to review decisions made by Commonwealth officers or federal courts
🧭 Grounds for Judicial Review
Common grounds for judicial review include:
Breach of Natural JusticeFailure to provide a fair hearing
Procedural Errors:Not adhering to required procedures
Lack of Jurisdiction:Exceeding legal authority
Improper Exercise of Power:Abuse or misuse of discretion
Error of Law:Incorrect interpretation or application of the law
Fraud:Decisions influenced by fraudulent actions
Absence of Evidence:No reasonable evidence to support the decision
Contrary to Law:Decisions that contravene legal principles
🏛️ Judicial Review in Practice
Judicial review is typically sought when an individual or entity believes that a government decision adversely affects them and that the decision was made unlawfull. Applicants must demonstrate "standing," meaning they have a sufficient interest in the matte. The process involves filing an application with the appropriate court, providing necessary documentation, and awaiting a determination on whether the decision should be upheld, quashed, or remitted for further consideration
⚠️ Recent Developments
In September 2024, the Australian government proposed amendments to the bill establishing the ART, which could limit the ability of asylum seekers to appeal immigration decisions based on minor technicalitie. Critics argue that these changes undermine fair process and could force refugees to seek costlier court reviews instead
RELATED Blog
0 comments