Media laws at Honduras
Honduras's media landscape is governed by a combination of constitutional provisions, specific laws, and regulatory bodies. While the country's constitution guarantees freedom of expression, the practical application of these laws and the overall environment for journalists have faced significant challenges.
I. Constitutional and Fundamental Rights:
National Constitution:
Article 182: Guarantees habeas data, allowing individuals to access, rectify, update, or remove personal information in public or private files that could harm their honor or privacy. Crucially, this guarantee does not affect the secrecy of journalistic sources.
The Constitution also provides for freedom of speech and press, generally prohibiting prior censorship and requirements for bail from authors or printers. It states that this freedom "has no limits other than respect for the rights of others, morality and public order, for the effect of the penalty incurred for the offense committed through the printing press."
It also enshrines the right to the inviolability and secrecy of correspondence, including telephone communications, with exceptions only by judicial order.
II. Key Legislation and Regulations:
Press Law (1921): This is the foundational law for the print press. As mentioned, it largely supports freedom of expression, stating that "It is free to express thoughts by word or in writing. No law or authority can establish prior censorship or require bail to authors or printers, or restrict freedom of the press."
Ley Marco del Sector de Telecomunicaciones (Framework Law on the Telecommunications Sector - LMT, Decree 185-95, amended by Decree 118-97): This is a critical law that regulates the audiovisual system, including radio, television, and, by extension, the internet, as there isn't a single comprehensive "general media law" in Honduras. Key aspects include:
Regulates the granting of radio and television frequencies.
Historically, automatic renewals of permits and the auction of frequencies have been criticized for limiting access to media ownership for smaller or community organizations.
It also contains provisions related to the inviolability of telecommunications, stating they cannot be intercepted or interfered with "save by judicial order."
Law for Transparency and for Access to Public Information (Decree 170-2006): This law enables public access to information held by public entities, with exceptions for "Confidential" or "Classified" information. It extends the constitutional protection of habeas data and prohibits the transmission of personal information that could lead to discrimination or harm.
Law for the Classification of Public Documents related to Defense and National Security (known as the "Secrecy Law," 2014, repealed in 2022): This law was highly controversial and criticized for hindering journalistic reporting on sensitive issues like the national budget by classifying information as "Reserved," "Confidential," "Secret," or "Ultra Secret" for extended periods. Note: This law was repealed in 2022. Its repeal was seen as a positive step towards greater transparency.
Special Law on the Interception of Private Communications (Decree 243-2011): This law outlines the conditions under which private communications can be intercepted by judicial order for criminal investigations. It places obligations on communication service providers (CSPs) to ascertain subscriber identities and retain communication data for a minimum of five years.
Ley de Limitación de Servicios de Telecomunicaciones en Centros Penitenciarios (Decree 43-2015): This law prohibits mobile phone services in prisons and requires CSPs to implement technical solutions to block signals in these facilities.
Criminal Code (relevant articles): Articles related to "crimes against honor" (defamation, insult) and "apology, incitement or justification of the crime of terrorism" have been used against journalists, leading to concerns about self-censorship and prison sentences. While the current government under Xiomara Castro campaigned on promises of justice reform, challenges remain regarding impunity for crimes against journalists.
III. Regulatory Body:
Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones (CONATEL): CONATEL is the national telecommunications regulatory agency. Its responsibilities include:
Administering and controlling the radio electric spectrum.
Granting, renewing, modifying, and revoking concessions, licenses, and permits for telecommunication services.
Ensuring compliance with technical regulations for telecommunication services.
IV. Challenges to Media Freedom and Legal Protections in Practice:
Despite the legal framework, the media environment in Honduras faces significant challenges:
Violence and Impunity: Honduras remains one of the most dangerous countries for journalists in Latin America. Journalists frequently face threats, assaults, and murders, with a high degree of impunity for these crimes.
Judicial Proceedings: Journalists, especially those working for opposition or community media, are often targets of offensive judicial proceedings, including defamation lawsuits that can lead to prison sentences.
Self-Censorship: Due to threats from organized crime and legal pressures, self-censorship is prevalent among journalists.
Effectiveness of Protection Mechanisms: While a mechanism for the protection of journalists exists, its effectiveness has been questioned, with reports of insufficient funding and staff.
Historical Censorship: Honduras has a history of censorship, particularly during periods of dictatorship and military governments, where media outlets were controlled or shut down, and dissenting voices suppressed.
Government Pressure: Concerns have been raised about government officials and powerful economic interests influencing media content and threatening journalists.
In summary, while Honduran media laws, particularly the Constitution and the Press Law, provide a strong foundation for freedom of expression, the practical reality for journalists is often constrained by a hostile environment, violence, legal challenges, and a history of interference. The repeal of the "Secrecy Law" was a positive development, but ongoing efforts are needed to ensure the full and safe exercise of media freedom.
RELATED Blog
0 comments