Media laws at DR Congo
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has a complex and often challenging media landscape, marked by a blend of constitutional guarantees for press freedom and a reality of significant restrictions and dangers for journalists. While there have been some recent legal reforms, concerns persist about their implementation and the broader environment for media.
Constitutional Basis
Constitution of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (2006, as amended): The constitution nominally guarantees freedom of expression and the press (Articles 23 and 24). It states that freedom of expression is exercised "with respect for the law, public order, and morality," and that the press can operate "within the limits of the law and public morals."
Key Laws
Historically, the primary media law was the 1996 Modalities of Freedom of the Press Act. This law was widely criticized for being highly restrictive and allowing for the criminalization of press offenses.
However, a significant development occurred in March 2023 with the introduction of Ordinance Law 23/009 on the terms and conditions for the exercise of Freedom of the Press, and a new Digital Code (Law 23/010). These laws replaced the stringent 1996 ordinance.
Key aspects and concerns with the new laws:
Decriminalization (Limited): While proponents hailed the new press law as a step towards decriminalizing press offenses, human rights and press freedom organizations (like CPJ, RSF, and JED) note that certain press offenses remain criminalized. For instance:
"False News": Section 123 of the press law states that the "publication, dissemination or reproduction" of "false news" is punishable under the Penal Code or the Code of Military Justice if made in "bad faith" and if it "shaken discipline or the morale of the armies or has hindered the war effort of the nation."
Offenses Against Public Officials: Section 124 states that the Penal Code will be used against anyone committing a press offense against "magistrates, civil servants and agents vested with public authority."
Digital Code (Law 23/010): Article 360 allows for up to six months in prison and/or a fine for individuals, including journalists, convicted of initiating or relaying "false information" via social media. Articles 358 and 359 can lead to up to two years in prison and heavy fines for electronic communications that "coerce, intimidate, harass or provoke emotional distress in a person" with the aim of encouraging "behaviour hateful, tribal and hostile to good morals and patriotic values." These vague provisions are highly concerning.
Protection of Sources: While the rights of journalists to protect their sources are set out in the Freedom of the Press Act, they are subject to exceptions in cases provided for by law, which can undermine the principle of confidentiality.
Access to Information: A law on access to information was approved by the Senate in 2015 but was never validated by the National Assembly. This means there is still no comprehensive legal framework guaranteeing public access to government information.
Law on the banning of dangerous discourse and messages in the press (2006): This law prohibits media from covering anything that could "incite hatred, disobedience, discrimination... [or] any act or uncivilized or non-civil behavior." This ambiguity can lead to self-censorship.
Regulatory Bodies
Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel et de la Communication (CSAC): This is the main regulatory body for audiovisual media and communication. It is mandated by the constitution to guarantee press freedom, protect the press, and ensure media independence and pluralism. However, the CSAC has faced criticism for:
Political Dependence: Its composition often includes delegates from political institutions, leading to concerns about its institutional independence.
Bias: It is often accused of being more lenient towards public media (which tend to favor the ruling regime) and severe towards private media that are perceived as more critical or balanced.
Interference: In the context of the ongoing conflict in eastern DRC, the CSAC has issued directives restricting media coverage of army operations, requiring journalists to rely on official sources, and prohibiting the broadcasting of debates on the military without the presence of "experts." This has been widely criticized by human rights organizations as interference with press freedom.
Challenges to Press Freedom
Despite the constitutional guarantees and the recent legal reforms, journalists in the DRC face severe challenges:
Criminalization of Journalism: As noted above, despite claims of decriminalization, journalists continue to face arrests and criminal charges (including defamation, spreading "false news," and offenses against public officials) for their work.
Conflict and Insecurity: The ongoing conflicts, especially in the eastern provinces, pose extreme dangers for journalists. They face threats, intimidation, arbitrary detention, and violence from both government forces and various armed groups (including M23 rebels).
Self-Censorship: The threat of legal action, violence, and intimidation leads to widespread self-censorship, with journalists avoiding sensitive topics like corruption, human rights abuses by security forces, or details of the conflict.
Economic Vulnerability and Corruption: Many journalists in the DRC work under precarious financial conditions with very low salaries. This vulnerability can lead to "coupage" (accepting payments to influence reporting) and a lack of professionalism, further undermining media credibility.
Limited Access to Information: The absence of a comprehensive access to information law hinders investigative journalism and transparency.
Political Interference and State Control: Public media are largely controlled by the party in power, and private media often exhibit political bias due to ownership structures or pressures.
In essence, the DRC's media laws are in a state of flux, with recent attempts to modernize them. However, the continued criminalization of certain press offenses, the politically influenced regulatory environment, and the pervasive climate of insecurity and economic challenges continue to severely impede the exercise of genuine press freedom in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
RELATED Blog
0 comments