Military Law at Western Sahara
Military law in Western Sahara is shaped by its unique political and territorial situation. The region is a disputed territory, with the conflict between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario Front (the Sahrawi nationalist movement) over control of Western Sahara being central to its governance. Consequently, the application and enforcement of military law in Western Sahara are influenced by the political dynamics and the ongoing conflict.
1. Historical and Political Context
Western Sahara, a territory located in North Africa, was formerly a Spanish colony. Upon Spain’s withdrawal in 1975, the Kingdom of Morocco and Mauritania both claimed sovereignty over the region. The Polisario Front, which represents the indigenous Sahrawi people, declared the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) in 1976 and has since fought for the independence of Western Sahara.
Moroccan Administration: Morocco controls most of Western Sahara, including the economically rich regions near the coast, and treats it as an integral part of its territory. Morocco has established a strong military presence in the region to maintain its control.
Polisario Front and SADR: The Polisario Front operates in the Tindouf camps in Algeria, where it has the support of Algeria and several other countries advocating for the self-determination of the Sahrawi people. The Polisario forces occasionally engage in military actions against Moroccan forces in the region.
Ceasefire and UN Involvement: A ceasefire brokered by the United Nations in 1991 halted large-scale fighting between Morocco and the Polisario Front. The ceasefire agreement established the MINURSO (United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara), which was tasked with overseeing the ceasefire and organizing a referendum on self-determination. However, the referendum has yet to take place, and the dispute remains unresolved.
2. Military Law in Moroccan-Controlled Western Sahara
In areas of Western Sahara controlled by Morocco, Moroccan military law applies. The Royal Moroccan Armed Forces (FAR) are responsible for the defense and security of the territory, including its military operations in Western Sahara.
Key Aspects of Military Law in Morocco:
Military Jurisdiction: The Moroccan military operates under the framework of Moroccan law, including the Moroccan Penal Code, the Code of Military Justice, and other regulations that govern the military's conduct. This includes the jurisdiction of military courts to handle offenses committed by members of the armed forces.
Military Criminal Law: Under the Code of Military Justice, Moroccan military personnel are subject to military law, which includes a range of offenses such as insubordination, desertion, mutiny, and crimes committed in the line of duty. The law also covers war crimes, including violations of international humanitarian law.
Moroccan Military Presence: Morocco maintains a significant military presence in Western Sahara, with several military bases and fortifications, particularly along the Moroccan Wall (also known as the Berm), a 2,700-kilometer-long defensive structure built by Morocco to secure the areas it controls. The military’s role in Western Sahara is often framed as part of Morocco’s broader efforts to assert its sovereignty over the territory.
Military Courts: Moroccan military courts handle offenses committed by military personnel, including those involved in operations in Western Sahara. These courts are authorized to prosecute offenses related to military discipline, as well as crimes during armed conflict. The Moroccan military justice system has been criticized for a lack of transparency and fairness in certain cases, particularly regarding issues of human rights violations.
3. Military Law in Polisario-Front-Controlled Areas
In the areas of Western Sahara controlled by the Polisario Front and the SADR, the military law is based on the legal framework established by the Polisario Front and its governing structures. The Polisario Front maintains a military wing known as the Sahrawi People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), which is responsible for defending the Sahrawi Republic and engaging in operations against Moroccan forces.
Key Aspects of Military Law in Polisario-Front-Controlled Areas:
Sahrawi Military Law: The legal structure governing military operations in the Polisario-controlled areas is influenced by the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic's governing bodies. The Polisario Front operates under a socialist-oriented ideology that incorporates a military and political structure. The military law framework is designed to regulate the conduct of the SPLA and ensure its commitment to the defense of the Sahrawi people and their right to self-determination.
Military Leadership: The Sahrawi People's Liberation Army is under the control of the Polisario leadership, with the President of the SADR serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the military forces. The leadership in exile operates primarily from refugee camps in Algeria, where it continues its fight for the independence of Western Sahara.
War Crimes and Humanitarian Law: The Polisario Front, like Morocco, is bound by international humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions. The SPLA is expected to adhere to the legal norms concerning the protection of civilians and prisoners of war. There have been allegations of human rights violations from both sides, but the Polisario Front’s adherence to international law is a key component of its legitimacy in seeking independence.
Military Justice System: The military justice system in the Polisario-controlled areas is less formalized than Morocco’s. However, it operates to address issues such as discipline, desertion, insubordination, and other military offenses. There are no independent judicial bodies like the military courts in Morocco, but the Sahrawi leadership handles issues of military misconduct.
4. The Role of International Law and the United Nations
Western Sahara's status under international law complicates the application of military law. Since Western Sahara is not fully recognized as an independent state by the international community, military actions in the region are subject to both national law (Moroccan or Polisario) and international law, including humanitarian law and the laws of war.
Key Aspects of International Law:
The Geneva Conventions: Both Morocco and the Polisario Front are parties to the Geneva Conventions, which regulate the conduct of armed forces during armed conflict. This includes provisions for the protection of civilians, the treatment of prisoners of war, and the prohibition of torture and other inhumane acts. Both sides in the conflict are required to adhere to these conventions, though violations have been reported over the years.
United Nations Involvement: The United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) was established to monitor the ceasefire and oversee a proposed referendum on self-determination for the Sahrawi people. However, the referendum has not been held, and the situation remains unresolved. MINURSO does not have a mandate to intervene in military actions or enforce military law but has played a role in reducing large-scale violence.
Self-Determination and International Support: International law, particularly the principle of self-determination, supports the Sahrawi people's right to choose their political status. The UN and many countries continue to call for a referendum on self-determination, though Morocco insists on its sovereignty over Western Sahara.
5. Challenges of Military Law Enforcement
Enforcing military law in Western Sahara is challenging due to the lack of a unified legal authority over the entire territory. Both Moroccan authorities and the Polisario Front enforce their own military laws within their controlled areas, but the lack of a final political resolution complicates the enforcement of broader international norms and standards.
Challenges include:
Jurisdictional Issues: Since Western Sahara is divided into areas controlled by Morocco and the Polisario Front, there is no single overarching legal system governing the entire territory. Both sides have their own military legal frameworks and military justice systems.
Human Rights Violations: Both Morocco and the Polisario Front have been accused of committing human rights violations, particularly related to military operations in the region. Human rights organizations have called for accountability, but the ongoing conflict and lack of international intervention have made addressing these violations difficult.
International Enforcement: While international law calls for the protection of civilians and the proper conduct of military forces, there is limited enforcement of these laws in Western Sahara due to the political complexities surrounding the territory's status.
Conclusion
Military law in Western Sahara is shaped by the complex and ongoing dispute between Morocco and the Polisario Front, with each side applying its own legal framework to the territories under its control. In areas controlled by Morocco, Moroccan military law governs military conduct, while in Polisario-controlled areas, the Sahrawi People's Liberation Army follows its own military legal system. International law, including humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions, applies to both sides but is often difficult to enforce due to the region’s unresolved political status. The military law in Western Sahara remains a contentious and sensitive issue, deeply intertwined with the broader struggle for the region's political future.
RELATED Blog
0 comments