Military Law at Afghanistan
Military Law in Afghanistan is influenced by both international legal standards, particularly International Humanitarian Law (IHL), and Afghanistan's domestic laws, which have evolved through different regimes over time. Military law governs the conduct of armed forces and is focused on regulating military justice, disciplinary actions, rules of engagement, and the treatment of prisoners of war (POWs), among other areas. Afghanistan's military law has been shaped by its historical context, especially the changes in governance brought about by the fall of the Taliban in 2001, followed by the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, and the subsequent return of the Taliban in 2021.
Here is an overview of military law in Afghanistan, covering its key features:
1. Military Law Under the Afghan Republic (2001–2021)
Under the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the military operated under a legal framework that combined Afghan domestic law, Islamic law (Sharia), and international law—particularly the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The Afghan National Army (ANA) and the Afghan National Police (ANP) were the primary military forces during this period.
Key Features of Military Law Under the Afghan Republic:
Military Justice System: The Afghan military had its own legal system for handling military offenses. This included:
Court Martial: Afghan military personnel could be tried in military courts for breaches of military discipline, including crimes like desertion, insubordination, and conduct unbecoming. Serious offenses were often tried by military courts following a formal investigation.
Military Code of Conduct: The Afghan military had its own set of rules of engagement (ROE) and ethical codes to govern the actions of soldiers, with particular attention to maintaining discipline, respect for civilian life, and compliance with international laws.
Disciplinary Actions: The Afghan military maintained strict codes of discipline, with various penalties for military personnel found guilty of misconduct, ranging from fines and demotions to imprisonment and execution for serious offenses.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and the Geneva Conventions: The Afghan National Army (ANA) was required to comply with international standards of human rights and IHL, especially the Geneva Conventions of 1949, which regulate the conduct of armed conflict and the protection of civilians and POWs.
Geneva Conventions: Afghanistan ratified the Geneva Conventions, obligating its military forces to treat captured fighters, civilians, and prisoners in accordance with international law.
Protection of Civilians: Afghan forces, particularly in collaboration with NATO and U.S. forces, were expected to adhere to rules that protect civilians during military operations, as laid out in the Geneva Conventions and customary international law.
Rules of Engagement (ROE): The Afghan military operated under Rules of Engagement that outlined when and how force could be used. These were critical in ensuring the lawful conduct of military operations and limiting collateral damage.
Military Training: Military personnel were trained in the principles of international law, including IHL and human rights law, particularly with support from NATO forces and the U.S. military. The goal was to ensure that Afghan forces adhered to international norms regarding the conduct of warfare.
Issues and Challenges:
Despite efforts to align with international standards, there were reports of human rights violations, including abuses against prisoners, extrajudicial killings, and attacks on civilians by some members of the Afghan military, especially during periods of intense conflict and insecurity.
Accountability was often an issue, as Afghan military courts were criticized for lacking independence and transparency, particularly in dealing with cases of corruption or abuses by military commanders.
2. Military Law Under the Taliban (2021–Present)
With the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, Afghanistan has shifted back to an Islamic Emirate, and the Taliban's interpretation of Sharia law now governs the country, including the military law framework. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has completely changed the previous legal and military structure, focusing on Islamic law rather than democratic or international legal standards.
Key Features of Military Law Under the Taliban:
Islamic Jurisprudence: Under the Taliban, military law is largely based on their strict interpretation of Sharia law. This affects how soldiers behave in combat and how military justice is administered.
Military Discipline: The Taliban’s military operates with a heavy emphasis on Islamic principles. Soldiers are expected to adhere to the values of Islam and Islamic justice. Any acts of misconduct may be punished according to Sharia penalties.
Court Martial and Punishments: While the Taliban does not appear to have a formal military justice system like that under the previous Afghan Republic, it is known that the Taliban imposes harsh penalties for certain crimes within the military, including floggings, amputations, and execution for serious offenses such as desertion or disobedience.
Punishments for Military Offenses: For offenses like desertion, the Taliban may issue punishments in line with their strict version of Islamic law, which can include physical punishments such as whipping or execution.
Use of Force and Rules of Engagement: The Taliban’s military appears to operate with a much more relaxed approach to rules of engagement, as the use of force is often justified through their interpretation of Islamic law. There is also a focus on jihad (holy war), and military campaigns are framed in terms of religious duty.
The Taliban’s military has engaged in several attacks against civilians, aid workers, and former government officials, despite international norms and calls for adherence to IHL.
Treatment of Prisoners of War (POWs): Under the Taliban, the treatment of POWs has been a subject of concern:
Abuses: There have been reports of the Taliban executing captured Afghan soldiers, especially those who were part of the former Afghan government forces, and humiliating prisoners.
Islamic Law: Under Sharia, the Taliban may justify actions such as executions or harsh treatment of prisoners of war. However, according to international law, POWs should be treated humanely.
International Law and Accountability: While the Taliban has shown little interest in adhering to international norms such as the Geneva Conventions, they have made political efforts to seek recognition from countries like China and Pakistan, which may indirectly pressure them to comply with international standards on the treatment of civilians and prisoners of war.
However, the Taliban's disregard for international law means that accountability for violations is limited. There have been numerous reports of war crimes, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and abductions under Taliban rule.
Impact on Civilian Populations:
Civilians in Conflict Zones: The Taliban’s military campaigns often ignore the protection of civilians, especially those who were affiliated with the previous government. This has led to human rights violations, including targeted killings, forced displacement, and violent reprisals.
Humanitarian Law Violations: The Taliban’s forces have been involved in numerous violations of International Humanitarian Law, such as attacks on civilian infrastructure and use of indiscriminate weapons in populated areas.
3. Military Training and Foreign Support
Taliban's Military Training: The Taliban has its own system for training soldiers, which is largely based on Islamic principles and the practices of the mujahideen from the 1980s. There is little emphasis on international law or human rights in their military training.
Foreign Support: The Taliban has received support from certain foreign powers (including Pakistan) and has established ties with other groups and countries, such as Iran and China. This external support impacts the military capabilities of the Taliban, though much of the military training remains ideological and religiously motivated.
4. International Criticism and the Taliban’s Military Conduct
War Crimes Allegations: The Taliban’s military has been accused of committing war crimes, including targeting civilians, summary executions, and forced disappearances. There have been widespread allegations of brutality against soldiers who served in the former Afghan government forces.
International Responses: Many countries, particularly those that supported the Afghan Republic, have condemned the Taliban's military practices. Human rights organizations continue to call for accountability for violations committed by the Taliban during their military campaigns and their ongoing rule.
Conclusion
Military law in Afghanistan has undergone significant transformations, particularly with the Taliban’s return to power in 2021. Under the Afghan Republic, the military followed a legal framework that combined national laws and international humanitarian standards. However, the Taliban's military operates under a theocratic and Islamic law-based system, which severely limits adherence to international legal norms.
The military justice system under the Taliban is characterized by the application of Sharia law, and the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians remains a key concern, with numerous reports of human rights violations. While Afghanistan's military law is largely shaped by Islamic jurisprudence under the Taliban, international scrutiny and the challenge of war crimes persist in the country’s military context.
RELATED Blog
0 comments