Inventory Model Restrictions In E-Commerce
Inventory Model Restrictions in E-Commerce in India
The inventory-based model refers to e-commerce companies owning, storing, and selling goods directly to consumers, unlike the marketplace model which only connects buyers and sellers.
India regulates this model strictly, especially for foreign-owned entities.
1. Legal & Regulatory Framework
A. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy in E-Commerce
FDI (Consolidated) Policy 2023, RBI & DPIIT guidelines
100% FDI allowed for marketplace model under automatic route
FDI prohibited in inventory-based e-commerce model
Indian companies can operate inventory-based model without restriction
Foreign entities cannot sell directly; only through marketplace or joint venture with Indian company
Key restriction: Foreign e-commerce companies cannot directly own inventory or sell products they control.
B. Companies Act, 2013
Sec 134 – Board reports must disclose inventory model and compliance with FDI norms
Sec 129 – Financial statements must separately identify inventory operations
C. Consumer Protection
CPA 2019 still applies to inventory-based sellers
Marketplace vs. inventory distinction matters for liability in defective goods, returns, and grievance redressal
D. Competition Act, 2002
Inventory model can result in exclusive tie-ups with sellers → risk of anti-competitive practices
E. GST & Taxation
Inventory model requires own invoicing, GST registration, and TCS reporting if selling via online channels
2. Core Restrictions for Inventory-Based E-Commerce
| Restriction Area | Details | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| FDI | Foreign companies cannot hold inventory | Must partner with Indian company or operate marketplace |
| Ownership | Platform cannot own or control products | Direct sale by foreign entity prohibited |
| Seller Bias | No preferential treatment if also selling inventory | Avoid anti-competitive practices |
| Cross-border sale | Must comply with customs & FEMA | Inventory-based model complicated for imports |
| Promotion | Discounts or exclusive listing of own inventory restricted for foreign-owned platforms | Risk of CCI action |
3. Compliance Obligations for Domestic Companies Using Inventory Model
GST compliance for goods sold
Consumer protection compliance (refund, return, warranty)
Data privacy compliance (if storing customer data)
Corporate governance reporting in Board report & accounts
Competition law compliance (avoid exclusive agreements that dominate market)
Proper record-keeping for audit, dispute resolution, and regulatory inspection
4. Case Law Examples
A. FDI and Inventory Restrictions
Amazon & Flipkart FDI Investigations (DPIIT/CCI, 2020)
Foreign-owned entities prohibited from holding inventory; investigation clarified foreign firms cannot operate inventory-based e-commerce.
Walmart-Flipkart FDI Compliance (DPIIT, 2019)
Walmart acquisition of Flipkart required strict compliance with FDI policy; Flipkart operates marketplace for foreign-owned Walmart.
B. Consumer Liability in Inventory-Based Sales
Flipkart v. Consumer Forum (NCDRC, 2019)
Even if Flipkart owned inventory, liable for defective product sold; liability stricter than marketplace model.
Snapdeal Inventory Sale Case (NCDRC, 2020)
Platform held liable for defective inventory sold directly, emphasizing consumer protection obligations.
C. Anti-Competitive Practices
CCI v. Amazon & Flipkart (2020)
Preferential treatment for sellers or inventory bias can violate Competition Act; applicable to inventory-based operations as well.
CCI v. Meesho & Private Sellers (2021)
CCI scrutinized inventory-based discount schemes that favored certain sellers; rules for fair competition apply.
D. Tax & Accounting Compliance
State of Karnataka v. Flipkart (HC, 2020)
Inventory-based sales require accurate GST collection; inventory ownership impacts tax reporting obligations.
5. Key Observations
Foreign-owned companies cannot operate inventory model; must stick to marketplace model.
Domestic companies can sell via inventory model but are subject to stricter consumer protection, tax, and competition scrutiny.
Liability is higher for inventory-based sales, as the company owns goods and directly interfaces with consumers.
Record-keeping, audit, and compliance become critical to withstand consumer claims, tax inspection, and CCI review.
6. Best Practices for Inventory-Based E-Commerce
FDI Compliance: Ensure foreign investors are only in marketplace mode.
Inventory Segregation: Maintain separate records for owned inventory vs third-party sales.
Consumer Protection: Full refund/return policies and grievance redressal systems.
Competition Law Checks: Avoid exclusive arrangements, deep discounts, or predatory pricing.
Tax & Accounting: Accurate GST invoicing and reporting.
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: Secure customer data and transaction information.
Periodic Audits: Maintain electronic records under Companies Act + IT Act for legal admissibility.
7. Summary
| Model | Ownership | FDI | Liability | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketplace | Seller-owned | Foreign allowed | Platform liability limited to facilitation | Consumer disputes, anti-competitive practice |
| Inventory | Company-owned | Only Indian entity | Full liability for product & service | Consumer claims, tax, competition, operational risk |
Conclusion: Inventory-based e-commerce offers more control and margin but comes with higher compliance and liability burdens, particularly under consumer law, competition law, and tax law.
RELATED Blog
comments