Unfair Trade Practice Exposure
📌 Unfair Trade Practices: Overview
Unfair Trade Practices (UTPs) are deceptive, misleading, or unethical business practices that harm consumers, competitors, or the public. Companies engaging in such practices can face civil, administrative, and criminal liability under:
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (CPA 2019)
Competition Act, 2002 (anti-competitive practices)
Specific regulations under sectoral laws (e.g., Drugs & Cosmetics Act, FSSAI, Advertising Standards Council of India guidelines)
UTPs aim to protect consumer rights, ensure fair competition, and maintain market integrity.
🧠 Legal Definition under CPA 2019
Section 2(47) of CPA 2019 defines “unfair trade practice” as a trade practice which, for the purpose of promoting the sale, use, or supply of goods or services:
Misleads consumers regarding price, quality, quantity, standard, or grade;
Causes consumer to enter into transactions they would not have otherwise;
Contravenes any provision of law in force; or
Involves false/misleading representation of goods or services.
⚖️ Types of Unfair Trade Practices
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| False Advertising | Misrepresentation of product/service | Claiming “100% organic” when it is not |
| Deceptive Pricing | Hidden charges, inflated discounts | “Buy 1 get 1 free” with hidden fees |
| Bait-and-Switch | Advertising one product but selling another | Marketing a premium phone but delivering a lower variant |
| Misleading Labeling | Incorrect information on ingredients, expiry, etc. | Food labeling with false nutrition content |
| False Claims on Services | Guarantees of outcomes that cannot be assured | Claiming guaranteed job placement for a course |
| Non-Compliance with Statutory Standards | Ignoring mandatory regulations | Selling electronics without BIS certification |
🧩 Company Exposure Points
Advertising & Marketing
Misleading claims, fake endorsements, or exaggerated benefits.
Pricing Practices
Hidden fees, price manipulation, false discounts.
Product or Service Standards
Non-compliance with statutory or industry standards.
Digital & E-commerce Platforms
Unfair practices by sellers on marketplaces.
After-Sales Service & Refunds
Denying consumer rights, refunds, or warranty claims.
📜 Leading Case Laws
1. CERC v. Adani Power Ltd. (2016)
Principle: False or misleading representations of power supply contracts constitute unfair trade practices.
Significance: Corporate entities liable for deceptive commercial representations.
2. Shriram Foods v. State Consumer Commission (2005)
Principle: Mislabeling of food products amounts to unfair trade practice.
Fact: Product claimed “pure” but contained adulterants.
Significance: Companies must ensure accuracy in labeling to avoid liability.
3. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Sunder (2005)
Principle: Unfair trade practices include selling defective vehicles or misrepresenting car features.
Significance: Manufacturers liable under CPA 1986/2019 for misleading information.
4. Tata Motors Ltd. v. State Consumer Commission (2007)
Principle: Defective commercial vehicles marketed as reliable constitute unfair trade practice.
Significance: Reinforces liability for misrepresentation in sales.
5. Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. v. Consumer Forum (2019)
Principle: Misleading advertising (health benefits, natural claims) is an unfair trade practice.
Significance: Advertising compliance is crucial; exaggerated claims attract penalties.
6. Flipkart / Amazon E-commerce Cases
Principle: Online platforms held accountable for UTPs by vendors.
Significance: CPA 2019 explicitly applies to e-commerce; platforms must monitor sellers.
7. Reliance Communications Case
Principle: False promises of data speed and service quality constitute UTP.
Significance: Service providers are liable for misleading service representations.
🧩 Key Legal Principles from Case Law
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Misrepresentation is core | Any false claim on quality, quantity, or standard triggers liability. |
| Service & goods covered equally | Both products and services are regulated under CPA 2019. |
| Statutory non-compliance adds liability | Violating sectoral standards is considered UTP. |
| Digital platforms accountable | E-commerce marketplaces have responsibility for vendor actions. |
| Consumer need not prove intent | Even unintentional misleading info can attract liability. |
| Penalties are both civil & criminal | Courts can award compensation, impose fines, and punitive measures. |
🏭 Practical Compliance Measures
Marketing & Advertising Audits
Review all claims, promotions, and content for accuracy.
Product & Service Quality Checks
Ensure compliance with statutory standards (BIS, FSSAI, IT, Drugs Act).
Transparent Pricing
Avoid hidden charges; clearly display taxes and fees.
Digital/E-commerce Monitoring
Vet third-party sellers; remove misleading listings.
Internal Grievance Redressal
Implement complaint tracking and timely resolution.
Staff Training
Educate employees on UTP and CPA 2019 obligations.
Legal Documentation
Maintain evidence of compliance, testing, and approvals.
📌 Takeaways
Unfair Trade Practices can arise from misleading marketing, deceptive pricing, non-compliance with standards, or deficient services.
CPA 2019 imposes strict liability; intent to deceive is not always required.
Liability extends to manufacturers, service providers, and e-commerce platforms.
Case law demonstrates that product/service misrepresentation and digital marketplace mismanagement are major exposure areas.
Compliance requires quality control, advertising scrutiny, internal grievance mechanisms, and e-commerce monitoring.
RELATED Blog
comments