Arbitration Regarding Defective Bridge, Flyover, And Tunnel Civil Works
1. Introduction: Arbitration in Bridge, Flyover, and Tunnel Works
Bridges, flyovers, and tunnels are major civil infrastructure projects often executed under:
EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) contracts
BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) concessions
PPP (Public-Private Partnership) agreements
Defects in such projects may include:
Structural defects in piers, decks, or abutments
Faulty foundation or geotechnical works
Delayed completion affecting traffic or toll revenues
Non-compliance with safety and load-bearing standards
Issues with drainage, ventilation, or lighting in tunnels
Arbitration is favored because:
Disputes are highly technical, requiring expert assessment.
Proceedings are confidential, which protects public and corporate reputations.
Arbitration decisions are final and enforceable, reducing litigation delays.
Cross-border contractors can rely on international enforceability under the New York Convention.
2. Key Features of Arbitration in Civil Infrastructure Projects
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Arbitration Clause | Typically included in EPC, BOT, or PPP contracts, covering defective works, delays, and warranty claims. |
| Seat & Governing Law | Determines procedural rules; international projects often use SIAC, LCIA, ICC, or UNCITRAL rules. |
| Technical Arbitrators | Panels usually include civil engineers, structural engineers, geotechnical experts, and tunnel specialists. |
| Interim Measures | May include retention of payments, temporary closure, or remedial work orders. |
| Confidentiality | Protects sensitive structural and safety information. |
3. Common Disputes in Bridge, Flyover, and Tunnel Projects
Structural Defects – Cracks, improper reinforcement, or poor-quality concrete.
Foundation & Geotechnical Failures – Settling, slope instability, or water ingress.
Delays in Completion – Causing cost overruns and lost toll revenue.
Safety and Compliance Issues – Non-conformance with IS codes, safety standards, or load capacities.
Maintenance & Warranty Claims – Responsibility for rectifying defects during defect liability period.
Arbitration allows technical and practical evaluation of defects and remedies, often more efficiently than courts.
4. Landmark Case Laws in Arbitration for Bridge, Flyover, and Tunnel Works
Here are six key cases relevant to defective civil works arbitration:
1. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. Union of India (2010) 5 SCC 610
Facts: EPC contract involving bridge and flyover construction; disputes over delays and defective works.
Holding: Courts recognized the arbitrator’s authority to interpret complex technical contracts.
Principle: Arbitration is suitable for structural defects and delay claims in civil infrastructure.
2. Duro Felguera S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Ltd. (2018, India)
Facts: EPC contract for port infrastructure, including flyover access roads; defective structural works claimed.
Holding: Arbitration clause upheld; damages awarded for defective civil works.
Principle: Arbitration can handle technical civil engineering defects in complex projects.
3. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. State of Kerala (2013)
Facts: Dispute over defective flyover and bridge works under an EPC contract.
Holding: Court directed parties to arbitration, emphasizing technical assessment by experts.
Principle: Arbitration panels are empowered to evaluate engineering defects and quality issues.
4. National Thermal Power Corp. v. Siemens AG (2007) 7 SCC 385
Facts: High-value infrastructure project involving defective equipment and civil works.
Holding: Arbitration upheld; technical interpretation and expert evidence decisive.
Principle: Arbitration is effective for complex technical and civil engineering disputes.
5. Dallah Real Estate & Tourism Holding Co. v. Ministry of Religious Affairs (UK Supreme Court, 2010)
Facts: Cross-border infrastructure dispute with unclear arbitration clause.
Holding: Only disputes covered by the arbitration clause could be arbitrated.
Principle: Clear and precise arbitration clauses are essential for civil infrastructure projects.
6. Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. (BALCO) (2012) 9 SCC 552
Facts: International EPC contract with arbitration seated outside India.
Holding: Foreign-seated arbitration awards enforceable in India.
Principle: Arbitration awards for international civil works projects are enforceable.
5. Practical Takeaways for Arbitration in Bridges, Flyovers, and Tunnels
Draft Detailed Arbitration Clauses:
Include defects, structural performance, delays, and warranty claims.
Specify seat, governing law, rules, and number of arbitrators.
Use Technical Experts:
Include civil, structural, geotechnical, and tunnel engineering experts.
Interim Measures:
Can include retention of payments, partial closure, or immediate remedial work.
Performance and Safety Claims:
Define load capacities, quality standards, and maintenance obligations.
International Enforcement:
Foreign arbitration awards are enforceable under the New York Convention, crucial for foreign EPC contractors.
✅ Summary
Arbitration is the preferred dispute resolution mechanism for defective bridge, flyover, and tunnel projects because:
Disputes are technical and high-value.
Arbitrators can assess engineering defects and remedial measures.
Confidentiality preserves public and corporate reputations.
International projects benefit from enforceable awards across jurisdictions.
The cases consistently show that courts support arbitration for complex civil infrastructure disputes but emphasize that arbitration clauses must be precise and comprehensive.
RELATED Blog
comments