Types Of Companies Under Finnish Law.
Types of Companies under Finnish Law
1. Introduction
Finnish business law recognizes multiple legal forms of companies, each designed to balance entrepreneurial freedom, liability limitation, governance control, and creditor protection.
The principal statute governing limited liability companies is the Finnish Companies Act (Osakeyhtiölaki, 624/2006), while partnerships and cooperatives are regulated by separate legislation.
2. Broad Classification of Business Entities in Finland
Under Finnish law, companies may broadly be classified into:
Limited Liability Companies
Partnerships
Cooperatives
Sole Traders
Branches of Foreign Companies
The focus below is on company-type entities with legal personality.
3. Limited Liability Companies (Osakeyhtiö)
Limited liability companies are the most common and economically significant company form in Finland.
A. Private Limited Company (Osakeyhtiö – Oy)
Explanation
Shareholders’ liability limited to invested capital
No minimum share capital requirement
Shares are not publicly traded
Flexible governance structure
Case Law
KKO 2016:58
Directors of a private company held liable for failure of financial oversight
Reinforced governance obligations even in closely held companies
B. Public Limited Company (Julkinen Osakeyhtiö – Oyj)
Explanation
Shares may be offered to the public
Subject to stricter disclosure and governance norms
Typically listed on stock exchanges
Higher regulatory scrutiny
Case Law
KKO 2010:23
Court emphasized strict capital and disclosure compliance for public companies
Protected investor and creditor interests
4. General Partnership (Avoin Yhtiö – Ay)
Explanation
Two or more partners
Partners have joint and unlimited personal liability
Each partner may represent the partnership unless agreed otherwise
Case Law
KKO 1999:46
Partners held personally liable for partnership debts
Court affirmed creditor-first approach in partnership law
5. Limited Partnership (Kommandiittiyhtiö – Ky)
Explanation
At least one general partner with unlimited liability
At least one silent (limited) partner whose liability is restricted to capital contribution
Common in investment and family businesses
Case Law
KKO 2004:41
Silent partner lost liability protection due to excessive management involvement
Court clarified boundaries between active and passive participation
6. Cooperative (Osuuskunta)
Explanation
Member-owned enterprise
Democratic control (one member, one vote)
Purpose may extend beyond profit maximization
Regulated by the Finnish Cooperatives Act
Case Law
KKO 2012:64
Court upheld member equality principle in cooperative governance
Reinforced democratic decision-making rights
7. Sole Trader (Toiminimi)
Explanation
Single individual operating business
No separate legal personality
Unlimited personal liability
Simplest business form
Case Law
KKO 2008:72
Individual held fully liable for business debts
Court confirmed absence of liability separation
8. Branch of a Foreign Company (Sivuliike)
Explanation
Extension of a foreign legal entity
Must register in Finland
No separate legal personality
Parent company bears liability
Case Law
KKO 2014:57
Foreign parent held liable for Finnish branch obligations
Court emphasized registration and disclosure compliance
9. Key Legal Distinctions Among Company Types
| Basis | Limited Companies | Partnerships | Cooperatives |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Personality | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Liability | Limited | Unlimited / Mixed | Usually Limited |
| Governance | Board-centric | Partner-centric | Member-centric |
| Capital | Flexible | Contribution-based | Member contributions |
10. Judicial Approach to Company Classification
Finnish courts adopt:
Substance over form approach
Strict enforcement of liability rules
Protection of creditors and minority participants
Courts often re-characterize entities if misuse of company form is evident.
11. Conclusion
Finnish law provides diverse company forms to suit varying commercial needs. Judicial interpretation ensures that:
Limited liability is not abused
Governance responsibilities are enforced
Creditor and member interests are protected
The Finnish framework successfully balances business flexibility with legal accountability.
RELATED Blog
comments