The Expansion of Tort Liability in the United States under Personal Injury
What is Tort Liability in Personal Injury?
Tort liability arises when one person’s wrongful act (intentional or negligent) causes harm or injury to another. The injured party (plaintiff) can sue the wrongdoer (defendant) for compensation.
Personal injury torts specifically deal with harm to the person — physical, emotional, or sometimes reputational.
The Expansion of Tort Liability: Historical Context
Initially, tort liability was quite limited and rigid, often requiring:
A direct physical injury
Clear fault or intentional harm
Limited types of recoverable damages
Over time, courts expanded tort liability, making it more flexible and accessible to injured parties.
Key Phases of Expansion in Tort Liability
1. From Intentional Torts to Negligence
Early tort law focused mainly on intentional torts (e.g., assault, battery). People were liable only if they intended harm.
Expansion: The doctrine of negligence developed, holding people liable not only for intentional harm but also for failing to exercise reasonable care, even if harm was accidental.
Case Example: Brown v. Kendall (1850)
In this case, Brown accidentally injured Kendall during a dog fight. The court introduced the concept of negligence, ruling that liability only arises if there is failure to exercise reasonable care.
This case marked a turning point, expanding tort liability to include carelessness, not just intent.
2. Duty of Care and Foreseeability
A crucial expansion was defining when a person owes a duty of care to another. Early courts were reluctant to impose duty broadly.
Expansion: Courts started to say that individuals owe a duty of care to anyone who could be foreseeably harmed by their actions.
Case Example: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928)
Mrs. Palsgraf was injured by falling scales after railroad employees helped a passenger board a train, causing a package to fall and explode. The court ruled the railroad was not liable because the harm was not a foreseeable result of their actions — narrowing duty of care to foreseeable plaintiffs.
This case shaped the foreseeability test and limited tort liability to those foreseeably harmed.
3. Strict Liability and Product Liability
Traditionally, liability depended on fault. But the courts expanded tort law to impose strict liability for certain activities or products — meaning liability without fault.
Case Example: Rylands v. Fletcher (an English case but influential in US law)
This case introduced strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities, later adopted in the US.
Case Example: Greenman v. Yuba Power Products (1963)
Greenman was injured by a defective power tool. The court held manufacturers strictly liable for defective products causing injury, regardless of negligence.
This greatly expanded personal injury claims by allowing recovery without proving fault, just causation and defect.
4. Expanding Categories of Damages and Plaintiffs
Courts expanded who can sue and what damages they can claim:
Emotional distress: Initially, courts required physical injury to claim damages. Over time, claims for emotional distress alone were recognized (e.g., negligent infliction of emotional distress).
Bystander claims: People who witness injury to loved ones may recover damages (e.g., in Dillon v. Legg).
Wrongful death: Tort liability was expanded to allow family members to sue for wrongful death of a loved one.
Summary: How Tort Liability Expanded Under Personal Injury
| Aspect | Traditional View | Expanded View | Case Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of liability | Intentional harm only | Negligence (carelessness) | Brown v. Kendall |
| Duty of care | Limited to direct victims | To foreseeable plaintiffs | Palsgraf v. Long Island RR |
| Fault requirement | Always required | Sometimes no fault (strict liability) | Greenman v. Yuba Power |
| Types of damages | Physical injury only | Emotional distress, bystander harm, etc. | Dillon v. Legg |
| Types of plaintiffs | Injured party only | Family, bystanders | Various |
Conclusion
The expansion of tort liability in the U.S. personal injury law reflects the courts’ efforts to fairly compensate injured persons beyond rigid old doctrines. From limiting liability to intentional acts to embracing negligence, foreseeability, strict liability, and broader damages, the law has grown to protect individuals in a complex modern society.
RELATED Blog
0 comments