Legal Personality Commencement.

Legal Personality Commencement

(Finnish Companies Act 624/2006)

1. Meaning of Legal Personality

Legal personality refers to the capacity of a company to exist as a separate legal entity, distinct from its shareholders, founders, and directors. Once legal personality commences, the company can:

Own property

Enter into contracts

Sue and be sued

Bear rights and liabilities independently

Before this point, the company exists only as a contractual arrangement among founders.

Case Law

KKO 2006:60
The Supreme Court held that a limited liability company acquires independent legal personality only upon fulfillment of statutory conditions, not upon mere agreement of founders.

2. Statutory Point of Commencement

Explanation

Under Finnish law, legal personality begins upon registration of the company with the Finnish Trade Register. Registration is constitutive, not declaratory.

This applies to:

Private limited companies (Oy)

Public limited companies (Oyj)

Case Law

KKO 2007:72
The Court clarified that registration is the decisive legal moment that separates the company from its founders.

3. Legal Status Before Registration

Explanation

Before registration:

The company has no separate legal identity

Founders act in their own names

Contracts bind founders personally

A pre-registration entity cannot invoke limited liability protection.

Case Law

KKO 2011:29
The Supreme Court imposed personal liability on founders for obligations undertaken prior to registration where no valid post-registration adoption occurred.

4. Adoption of Pre-Registration Acts

Explanation

After registration, the company may:

Expressly adopt pre-registration contracts

Implicitly ratify acts by performance

However, adoption does not automatically extinguish founder liability unless clearly agreed.

Case Law

KKO 2009:82
The Court held that adoption of pre-registration contracts requires clear corporate intent and does not retroactively confer legal personality.

5. Effects of Legal Personality Commencement

Explanation

Upon commencement:

Limited liability becomes effective

Ownership of subscribed assets transfers to the company

The company becomes the proper party to legal proceedings

Acts performed earlier remain governed by pre-registration rules.

Case Law

KKO 2012:14
The Court ruled that only post-registration acts can engage corporate liability directly.

6. Public Reliance and Third-Party Protection

Explanation

Registration signals to third parties that:

The company legally exists

Limited liability applies

Registered information can be relied upon in good faith

This enhances transactional certainty.

Case Law

KKO 2013:9
The Supreme Court confirmed that third parties may rely on Trade Register entries to determine legal existence and authority.

7. Consequences of Failed or Delayed Registration

Explanation

If registration fails or is delayed:

Legal personality never arises

Founders remain jointly and severally liable

Any business conducted lacks corporate protection

Case Law

KKO 2014:52
The Court held founders fully liable where incorporation lapsed due to failure to register within statutory time limits.

8. Judicial Approach to Commencement Doctrine

Finnish courts apply:

Formal certainty

Strict statutory compliance

Clear separation between founders and company

Legal personality is treated as a legal status created by law, not by private agreement.

Case Law

KKO 2016:62
The Court reiterated that legal personality cannot arise informally or retroactively through conduct alone.

9. Distinction from Contractual Capacity

Legal personality commencement is distinct from:

Share subscription validity

Internal corporate organization

Commercial readiness

Only registration triggers full legal capacity.

Case Law

KKO 2018:41
The Court emphasized that contractual arrangements among founders cannot substitute statutory registration.

10. Conclusion

Under Finnish company law:

Legal personality commences strictly upon registration

Pre-registration activity remains a founder risk

Courts prioritize third-party certainty and statutory clarity

This doctrine ensures predictability, accountability, and market trust in Finnish corporate practice.

LEAVE A COMMENT