Division Of Powers Between Board And Ceo.
Division of Powers Between Board and CEO
In corporate governance, the Board of Directors and the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) have distinct but complementary roles. Courts and corporate law have repeatedly clarified these roles to ensure effective management, accountability, and shareholder protection.
1. Role of the Board of Directors
The Board is the supreme decision-making authority of the company. Its primary responsibilities include:
Strategic Decisions: Approving mergers, acquisitions, capital raises, and long-term policies.
Oversight: Monitoring CEO performance and major corporate initiatives.
Fiduciary Duties: Acting in the best interests of shareholders, avoiding conflicts of interest.
Policy Approval & Risk Management: Ensuring high-risk operations and policies align with corporate objectives.
Key Principle: The Board does not manage day-to-day operations; it sets strategy and supervises execution.
Case Laws:
Shlensky v. Wrigley (1968, US) – Board’s decision to not install stadium lights was upheld, confirming board discretion in strategic decisions.
Smith v. Van Gorkom (1985, Delaware Supreme Court) – Board approved a merger without proper due diligence; court held the Board liable for breaching the duty of care.
Stone v. Ritter (2006) – Board held accountable for failing to implement adequate reporting and compliance systems.
2. Role of the CEO
The CEO is responsible for executing the strategy approved by the Board:
Operational Management: Day-to-day administration, staff management, and operational decision-making.
Reporting: Providing timely and accurate information to the Board.
Representation: Acting on behalf of the company in contracts and negotiations.
Compliance Supervision: Ensuring internal policies, regulations, and risk management procedures are followed.
Key Principle: CEO cannot override Board resolutions or make strategic decisions beyond delegated authority.
Case Laws:
4. In re Caremark International (1996) – CEO held liable for failing to ensure corporate compliance, establishing the duty of oversight in operations.
5. Re Barings plc (1995, UK) – CEO responsible for failure to supervise rogue trading, showing operational authority comes with accountability.
3. Delegation and Oversight Limits
Boards can delegate operational powers to the CEO, but ultimate responsibility remains with the Board:
Cannot delegate ultimate fiduciary duties.
Cannot delegate decisions requiring shareholder approval.
Must monitor delegation to prevent mismanagement or regulatory breaches.
Case Laws:
6. Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation (2005) – Both CEO and Board held accountable; delegation of management did not shield Board from oversight liability.
7. Enron Corp. (Skilling & Lay, 2006) – Extensive delegation to CEO did not absolve Board of liability for failure to oversee financial reporting and compliance.
4. Interaction Between Board and CEO
CEO reports to Board: Boards require timely operational and financial reports.
Board sets strategy; CEO executes: Clear separation ensures accountability and efficiency.
Checks and Balances: Board can remove or replace CEO if duties are neglected or breached.
5. Summary Table: Powers and Responsibilities
| Authority | Powers | Limits | Key Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors | Strategic decisions, oversight, fiduciary duties, policy approval | Cannot manage daily operations, cannot ignore delegation oversight | Shlensky v. Wrigley, Smith v. Van Gorkom, Stone v. Ritter |
| CEO | Day-to-day operations, strategy execution, reporting, operational compliance | Cannot override Board or make strategic decisions without approval | Caremark, Re Barings, Enron/Skilling & Lay |
| Shared/Overlap | Compliance monitoring, risk assessment, corporate governance | Both accountable for oversight and reporting failures | WorldCom, Directors & Officers Liability Cases |
6. Key Takeaways
Board = Strategic Oversight, CEO = Operational Execution.
Delegation to CEO does not remove Board’s ultimate accountability.
Fiduciary duties apply to both levels: Board for oversight, CEO for execution.
Courts hold both parties accountable in cases of mismanagement, compliance failure, or financial fraud.
Clear reporting and communication lines prevent disputes and legal exposure.
RELATED Blog
comments