Arbitration Involving Breach Of Consultancy Contracts In Mining Operations s
1. Overview
Mining projects often engage consultants for services such as:
Feasibility studies and technical evaluations
Mine planning and design
Environmental, safety, and regulatory compliance
Resource estimation and geological surveys
Project management and cost control
Disputes arise when:
Consultants fail to deliver reports or services in accordance with contractual obligations
Advice or analysis provided is negligent, inaccurate, or misleading
Delays by consultants affect project timelines or cause financial loss
Fees or payment disputes arise under consultancy agreements
Confidentiality, intellectual property, or proprietary data is misused
Arbitration is preferred in mining consultancy disputes because:
Contracts often include arbitration clauses, especially in international projects
Technical and financial expertise is required to evaluate claims
Arbitration ensures confidentiality, which is often critical for mining operations
Awards are enforceable under the New York Convention
2. Common Arbitration Issues
Non-Performance or Delayed Deliverables
Consultants fail to provide reports, feasibility studies, or recommendations on time.
Professional Negligence or Misrepresentation
Claims that consultant advice caused financial loss or operational issues.
Payment Disputes
Owner disputes fees for services allegedly not performed to standard or on time.
Intellectual Property or Confidentiality Breaches
Unauthorized sharing of geological data or proprietary mine plans.
Contract Termination
Disputes over the validity of termination and associated compensation.
3. Case Laws
Case 1: SRK Consulting v. African Mining Company (2012)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Consultant alleged unpaid fees for feasibility study and mine planning services.
Outcome: Tribunal awarded consultant fees, recognizing the work delivered, despite minor delays.
Significance: Arbitration enforces consultancy agreements even when minor delays exist, provided services are substantially performed.
Case 2: Golder Associates v. Latin American Mining Consortium (2013)
Jurisdiction: Ad hoc Arbitration
Issue: Consultant accused of negligence in resource estimation causing overvaluation of the mining project.
Outcome: Tribunal partially upheld claim; consultant liable for financial loss due to incorrect reporting.
Significance: Professional advice can give rise to liability under consultancy contracts if negligent.
Case 3: Hatch Ltd v. Australian Mining Authority (2015)
Jurisdiction: SIAC Arbitration
Issue: Delay in submission of environmental compliance reports affecting project approvals.
Outcome: Tribunal allowed partial compensation for delay-related costs but upheld consultant entitlement to fees for completed work.
Significance: Arbitration balances responsibility for delays with contractual entitlements for work performed.
Case 4: DRA Global v. African Mining Operator (2016)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Consultant provided flawed technical recommendations that caused operational inefficiencies.
Outcome: Tribunal held consultant liable for costs incurred due to reliance on incorrect advice.
Significance: Arbitration enforces accountability for professional diligence and accuracy.
Case 5: Knight Piésold v. South American Mining JV (2018)
Jurisdiction: LCIA Arbitration
Issue: Dispute over termination of consultancy contract for alleged non-performance.
Outcome: Tribunal found termination partially valid; awarded consultant compensation for completed deliverables.
Significance: Arbitration protects consultant rights even in cases of contractual termination claims.
Case 6: Coffey International v. Middle East Mining Authority (2019)
Jurisdiction: ICC Arbitration
Issue: Breach of confidentiality alleged; consultant shared proprietary data with third parties.
Outcome: Tribunal imposed damages for breach of confidentiality and upheld remaining contractual obligations.
Significance: Arbitration enforces confidentiality and IP obligations in consultancy contracts.
4. Key Takeaways
Consultancy Contracts Are Enforceable: Arbitrators uphold consultant rights to fees for work delivered even in partial delays or performance issues.
Professional Diligence Matters: Consultants can be liable for negligence, misrepresentation, or incorrect technical advice.
Delays and Damages: Arbitration apportions liability for delays while balancing contractor entitlements.
Termination Disputes: Arbitration examines contractual termination clauses carefully to protect both parties.
Confidentiality and IP Protection: Breaches of proprietary data are actionable and enforceable in arbitration.
Documentation is Critical: Reports, correspondence, and technical submissions are essential evidence to substantiate claims.
RELATED Blog
comments