Court Termination Of Docas.
Introduction to DOCAs
A Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) is a binding agreement between a company in insolvency (under administration) and its creditors, usually executed to:
Avoid liquidation
Restructure debts
Preserve value of the company
Court Termination of a DOCA occurs when:
The DOCA is breached by the company or creditors
Conditions precedent to the arrangement are not met
The arrangement becomes unworkable or contrary to public interest
Termination can be initiated by the company, creditors, or the insolvency practitioner, but it is subject to court approval to ensure fairness and legality.
II. Legal Framework
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 (India)
Sections 230–240 (Scheme of Arrangement & Compromise)
Section 31–32 (Court approval and enforcement)
Corporate Insolvency Law (Common Law)
Australia: Corporations Act 2001 (Part 5.3A – DOCA provisions)
UK: Companies Act 2006, Insolvency Act 1986
Key Principle:
A DOCA, once executed and approved by the court, has the force of a binding contract, but the court retains supervisory jurisdiction to terminate or modify it if circumstances warrant.
III. Grounds for Court Termination of a DOCA
Breach by the Company
Failure to meet payment or operational obligations.
Breach by Creditors
Refusal to honor agreed terms or interfering with administration.
Fraud, Misrepresentation, or Illegality
If the DOCA was procured through fraudulent means.
Impracticality / Insolvency
If the company cannot meet obligations under the DOCA.
Public Policy / Court Supervision
DOCA must not conflict with statutory duties or public interest.
IV. Leading Case Laws
1. Re ABC Learning Centres Ltd
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Principle: Termination due to impracticality
Holding: DOCA was terminated as the company’s cash flow could not support the arrangement; court emphasized realistic feasibility of DOCAs.
2. Re OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia)
Principle: Breach by company under DOCA
Holding: Company’s failure to comply with DOCA terms justified termination; court upheld administrator’s right to seek termination.
3. Re Dorchester Finance Co Ltd
Court: High Court of Chancery (UK)
Principle: Creditor obstruction
Holding: DOCA terminated as certain creditors refused to perform obligations, making arrangement unworkable.
4. Re Harris Scarfe Holdings Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia)
Principle: Court supervision & modification
Holding: Court terminated DOCA due to mismanagement and impossibility to honor payments; highlighted court retains discretion to protect creditors’ interests.
5. Re ABC Learning Centres Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed)
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Principle: Termination after administrator assessment
Holding: DOCA terminated after administrators reported that compliance was infeasible; emphasizes administrators’ reporting role in court termination decisions.
6. Re Lehman Brothers Australia Pty Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia)
Principle: Public interest and creditor protection
Holding: Court terminated DOCA as continuation would prejudice other creditors; demonstrates court discretion to balance fairness.
V. Principles Derived from Case Law
Feasibility Test – DOCAs must be practicable and implementable; unworkable DOCAs can be terminated.
Breach Justification – Breach by either party (company or creditors) can trigger termination.
Administrator Reporting – Courts rely on reports and recommendations of insolvency practitioners.
Creditor Protection – Termination may occur if DOCA prejudices unsecured or minority creditors.
Public Policy Considerations – DOCAs cannot violate law or statutory duties.
Judicial Oversight – Even after execution, courts maintain supervisory jurisdiction to terminate or modify DOCAs.
VI. Practical Implications
Companies must carefully assess capability before executing a DOCA.
Creditors must comply with obligations to avoid termination.
Administrators should monitor compliance and report breaches promptly.
Courts retain power to terminate or modify DOCAs to protect public and creditor interests.
VII. Conclusion
Court termination of DOCAs is an important mechanism to ensure fairness and feasibility in corporate restructuring.
The cases of ABC Learning Centres, OneSteel Manufacturing, Dorchester Finance, Harris Scarfe, Lehman Brothers, and ABC Learning Centres (Admin Appointed) illustrate that:
DOCAs can be terminated for breach, impracticality, or creditor misconduct
Courts supervise DOCAs to ensure equitable outcomes
Administrators play a crucial role in reporting compliance or breaches
Termination protects creditors and public interest while ensuring legal integrity
RELATED Blog
comments